Wednesday, 22 June 2011

LAWS CAN BE COMPLEX !

While unambiguous when it comes to punishing the guilty , laws must have built-in provisions to protect the innocent against blackmail / harassment thru frivolous use.

Team Anna should keep this in mind while framing their version of “ Right to Recall “ bill [ RTR ]

They must ask – and answer – following questions :

  • How many voters are there in that constituency ?

  • How many voters were there when that representative [ MP / MLA / Corporator etc ], got elected ?

  • What %age of voters voted in that election ?

  • What %age of cast votes did that representative get ?

  • What should be the minimum %age of voters who will be required to sign the recall petition – mentioning their UID / PAN / Voter ID ?

  • Who should the petition be addressed to ? Speaker ? President ?

  • Should petition contain specific charges, substantiated by evidence against that representative ?

  • Which agency shall investigate the charges and on whose order ?

  • If referendum is to be resorted to, which agency shall order the referendum and when ?

  • Who will conduct the referendum ?

  • Will referendum seal the fate of that representative thru a simple majority of those voting – irrespective of the no of voters in that constituency ?

  • Will the concerned representative have a right to defend himself ?

  • Can any action be taken against the petitioning  voters if the petition is found to be frivolous ? Should they be debarred from voting for 15 years ?

  • If found guilty and re-called , will the concerned representative be allowed to contest in the next election ? Or , should he be debarred for 15 years ?

  • Depending upon the extent of the guilt, will there be punishment of the concerned representative in addition to recall ?

Obviously, this is not an exhaustive list and Team Anna should invite public to add to these


We must not throw out the baby with the bath-water !


With regards


HEMEN PAREKH

No comments:

Post a Comment