Thursday, 23 October 2025

Perseverance = the Bridge between a Blog / E Mail and a Court Order.


 

===================================================


From Concept to Court Order: The Service-Liability Vision Becomes Reality

(24 Oct 2025)


“If P in HCP stands for Perseverance — this is what it means!”

 

Back in June 2019, I wrote a blog titled “Needed : a Service Liability Act,

arguing that citizens deserve protection not just from defective products, but also

from defective public services.


(Read original post →)


Six years later, the Bombay High Court has acted — without waiting for

Parliament — and has effectively implemented several of those ideas through its

directive on pothole-related accidents.


(News report → Hindustan Times, 24 Oct 2025)


🧩 The 2019 Proposal


I had called for a Service Liability Act to make public agencies legally

accountable for negligence, indecision, or delay.


Each case, I suggested, should be rated through a SLAM — Service Liability

 Assessment Matrix that captured:


  • Coverage: whether the neglect hurt one person, a community, or the nation.


  • Cause: omission, abdication, or mala fide decisions.


  • Extent / Time / Impact: minor-to-severe, short-to-long, mild-to-heavy losses.


  • Citizen Interface: an online form or mobile app for feedback and tracking.


  • Accountability: recovery of damages and penalties from the guilty official.



⚖️ The 2025 High Court Directive


In its landmark order, the Court:


  • Recognised the right to safe, motorable roads as part of the right to life.


  • Allowed citizens or victims’ families to claim compensation for deaths or

  • injuries due to potholes, uneven roads, or open man-holes.


  • Fixed standard compensation: ₹6 lakh for death; ₹50 000–₹2.5 lakh for

  • injuries (depending on severity), payable within eight weeks.


  • Directed that the ultimate liability be recovered from the responsible

  • engineer, contractor, or civic official — through salary deductions or forfeiture

  • of bills.


  • Ordered departmental and criminal action in cases of gross negligence.


  • Mandated a single-window complaint system (toll-free / app / web) and

  • monitoring committees.



📊 Comparison: Vision → Implementation



2019 Proposal

2025 High Court Directive

Coverage
: Individuals, communities, entire regions

Any person injured or family of deceased may claim

Cause
: Negligence / abdication / mala fide decisions

Liability fixed on engineer / contractor / authority

Extent & Impact
: SLAM matrix for severity, time, and economic loss

Fixed slabs for death/injury; strict payment timeline

Citizen Interface
: Online complaint & rating system

Court-ordered single-window digital portal

Accountability
: Financial recovery and punitive action

Recovery from erring officials; disciplinary & criminal penalties

Legal Structure
: Proposed Service Liability Act

Judicially implemented in absence of legislation

🌱 Why It Matters


This is how change happens — an idea proposed in 2019 transforms into judicial

reality in 2025.


It affirms that public service negligence can no longer hide behind red tape.


But the journey is not over:

  • The Court has applied this to roads; it must now extend to water, power,

  •  waste, pollution, and building safety and umpteen other services

  • What began as a judicial order must evolve into a national law.

  • Citizens must learn to document, report, and demand accountability

  • using the new mechanism.


💡 With regards,

Hemen Parekh

www.HemenParekh.ai / www.IndiaAGI.ai / www.My-Teacher.in / 24 Oct 2025

No comments:

Post a Comment