Especially if arbitration leans heavily on AI (
Artificial Intelligence )
Chief Justice S A Bobde seems to think so , as per
following report :
Extract :
“Artificial Intelligence could provide immense
benefits for the arbitration process and its users
By augmenting human cognitive abilities, AI
powered services could assist lawyers in,
Ø Drafting
Ø Identification
of better authorities
Ø Reviewing
documents … etc
It is well placed to assist arbitral tribunals in,
Ø Preparation
of awards
Ø Simultaneous
judicial review
Ø Streamlining
case management.
AI based analytics system could be used ,
Ø To
predict costs , duration and possible resolution
Ø Proposing
a range of settlement based on analysis of previous arbitrations of similar
size and complexity
AI assisted arbitration holds immense promise for
arbitration community “
--------------------------------------------------
Earlier ( on 24 Jan ), Hon Bobde had said :
“The AI systems we are
currently looking to employ in courts, possesses reading speed of one million
characters per second. I can imagine a system similar to this can be used to
rea and extract all relevant facts, compute tax effect and assist in a myriads
of new ways to propel the pace of decision
making “
Dear CJI,
What you imagined is
about to happen !
Here it is : IBM’s New AI System
Can Compose Logical Arguments
Highlights :
IBM
recently unveiled a new artificial intelligence system
that can craft lengthy, persuasive arguments during
a debate.
At
the show [ CES ], it presented arguments
both for and against making gambling illegal. It later did
the same for the idea of developing autonomous cars.
Project Debater does
little writing of its own — the AI system’s core strength comes from categorizing
and analyzing the arguments fed into it by humans.
The
algorithm scans short human-written arguments on
a potential debate topic for specific keywords and language
Then it
groups those arguments by topic, determines whether they’re for or against the
proposal, and organizes a speech based
on the arguments it analyzed.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
With more than 3.5 crore
cases pending in Indian Courts, many for 10-20 years, there is no doubt that
common citizen would rather suffer injustice than spend a fortune in hiring a
lawyer !
Dear Shri RaviShankar Prasaji,
As per a report of the China AI Development
2018, somewhere between 2013 and 2018, the investment and financing in the AI innovation area of China
represent 60% on the planet. This
was valued at $27
billion in 2017.
In recently announced budget, the Government has allocated Rs. 8,000
crore ( approx. $ 1.2
billion ) for the National Mission on Quantum Computing and Technology.
No doubt, there are many projects competing for this fund. I urge you to
allot 10 % of this
budget to the Supreme Court
Related Reading :
Congratulations,
Hon CJI , Shri S A Bobdeji [ 07 Dec
2019 ]
AI come to judgement ? Not for a
while ! [ 17 De
2019 ]
Project
Debater
====================================================
17 Feb 2020
hcp@RecruitGuru.com
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDelete