Hi Friends,

Even as I launch this today ( my 80th Birthday ), I realize that there is yet so much to say and do. There is just no time to look back, no time to wonder,"Will anyone read these pages?"

With regards,
Hemen Parekh
27 June 2013

Now as I approach my 90th birthday ( 27 June 2023 ) , I invite you to visit my Digital Avatar ( www.hemenparekh.ai ) – and continue chatting with me , even when I am no more here physically

Saturday, 7 December 2019

Congratulations, Hon CJI , Shri S A Bobdeji


Congratulations, Hon CJI , Shri S A Bobdeji ,



Upon your appointment as CJI




And , with a request to re-consider your following views :

[ source : Justice delayed is Justice Denied  /  12 Sept  2018  ]

 

Where you are supposed to have said :

 

      “ We are here on the way of trial being conducted through WhatsApp. This cannot be done .

        What kind of a trial is this ?  Is this a kind of joke ? “




Here is why I urge you to reconsider your views on conducting internet-based trials :


China unveils its digital courts with AI judges and verdicts revealed on chat apps as Beijing introduces cyber justice to deal with backlog in cases 




Highlights :


Ø  China has unveiled a new system of digital justice with artificial-intelligence judges, cyber-courts, and verdicts delivered on chat apps.


Ø  Already handled more than three million legal cases or other judicial procedures since its launch in March


Ø  an online interface with litigants appearing by video chat as an AI judge - complete with on-screen avatar - that prompts them to present their cases


Ø  'Does the defendant have any objection to the nature of the judicial blockchain evidence submitted by the plaintiff?'

- the black-robed virtual judge sitting under China's national emblem asked in a pre-trial meeting.
     'No objection,' a human plaintiff answered.

Ø  Litigants can register their civil complaints online and later log on for their court hearing.


Ø  '[ Concluding cases ] at a faster speed is a kind of justice, because justice delayed is justice denied,'  Hangzhou Internet Court Vice President Ni Defeng said


Ø  Ni added that the use of blockchain technology was particularly useful, helping to streamline and create clearer records of the legal process.


Ø  Together, they have accepted a total of 118,764 cases, and concluded 88,401, the Supreme People's Court said


Ø  The 'mobile court' option on WeChat - China's leading social-media messaging platform - allows users to complete case filings, hearings, and evidence exchange without physically appearing in court


=========================================================


In my above-mentioned blog [ sent to Supreme Court as an email ], I had suggested :



 Launch online portal……..www.OnlineJustice.gov.in…… having following features / pages / User
 Interfaces :




#   Who can register a litigation and how ( detailed form to be filled in )


#   What kind of complaints can be filed ( Eg; property / divorce / fraud / loans etc )


#   Time frame of hearings ( based on backlog at that point )


#   Search / Selection of “ empanelled lawyers “ ( with their fees tariff )


#   Method of conducting “ Online Trial “ ( Audio – Video Conference calls )


#   Online payment of Court Fees / Lawyer’s fees


#   Who can “ watch “ the online trial and how ( Video broadcast ) and when


#   Progress Chart as trial proceeds / Upload – Download of documents


#   Court Room allotted ( by software ) to each litigation


     Not being limited by any “ Physical Constraints “ , it will be possible ( for the
     software ), to open as many “ Virtual / Online “ Court Rooms as required


     Only limitation will be the number of available Judges at any given time


   
 # And as far as finding 10,000 Judges to conduct “ Online Trials “ from the comfort of
      their homes ( and without imposing any “ Infrastructure Burden “ on the State –
      except providing them with a fast broadband connection ) , I suggest that we rope in
      retired judges on a “ Per Case Retainer “ basis ( paid into their Jan Dhan accounts )



  #   There must be a “ Bonus cum Penalty “ formula to govern the payments to the
       Judges , depending upon the “ Actual Time “ taken to dispose off a given case as
       against the “Target Time “ ( to be computed by Artificial Intelligent Software , based on
       historical data being continuously compiled for all the cases , once the portal gets
       launched )


          

     I urge Chief Justice Hon Deepak Misraji to treat this email as a PIL and “ direct “ the
     NDA government to initiate action on this suggestion ( I cannot afford a lawyer ! )




Your " Activism " in this matter will go a long way to restore the faith of the ordinary citizens in the judiciary  !

I rest my case !


With regards,

Hemen Parekh

=================================================
08  Dec  2019

hcp@RecruitGuru.com

 



No comments:

Post a Comment