₹500 Crore for Aging EVMs? Here's What We Should Do Instead
Hemen Parekh | June 2026
THE CRISIS IS IN PLAIN SIGHT
Last week, the Economic Times reported that the Election Commission is seeking ₹500 crore from the Government ahead of the 2029 general elections to replace aging Electronic Voting Machines (EVMs) and set up new polling booths.
Let me be direct: We're about to spend ₹500 crore fixing yesterday's problem while tomorrow's solution is already on the shelf.
I have been advocating for modern voting technology since 2016. That's ten years. Ten years of detailed technical proposals, feasibility studies, and proof-of-concept models—all available in the public domain. And yet, here we are, preparing to spend half a billion rupees on machines that will themselves be "aging" again within a decade.
The window to act differently is closing. The 2029 elections are three years away. We have just enough time to implement a solution that doesn't merely replace EVMs—it reimagines elections themselves.
WHAT THE ₹500 CRORE ACTUALLY BUYS
The EC needs new EVMs because:
• Current EVMs are aging (many deployed since 2006–2010) • New booths are needed as India's electorate grows and urbanization expands • Maintenance costs are escalating • Each new EVM costs approximately ₹39,364 (based on 2015 procurement data) • Paper management for VVPATs is cumbersome—taking 1 hour to manually count slips from a single polling station
This is a recurring problem. In 10 years, these new EVMs will age again. In 20 years, we'll be seeking another ₹500 crore.
But what if we broke this cycle?
THE ALTERNATIVE: THREE PROVEN PROPOSALS
PROPOSAL 1: EAT (Electronic Audit Trail) — May 2026
In my May 2026 blog "Time-Stamping of VVPAT? Here is a Better Alternative," I outlined a comprehensive replacement for VVPAT paper slips:
How it works: • Voter places mobile phone on a Bluetooth-enabled EAT device (cost: ~₹8,000 per unit) • Vote is cast on EVM • Data transmitted wirelessly to voter's mobile as password-protected SMS • Data simultaneously uploaded to Election Commission's Central Server in real-time • Voter verifies her vote for 10 minutes • No paper. No manual counting. No disputes.
Why this is superior to buying new EVMs:
✓ Eliminates 97 crore VVPAT paper slips (for 9.7 crore voters in a general election) ✓ Zero manual counting bottleneck — instant electronic verification ✓ Results declared within MINUTES of the last vote cast ✓ One-time capital cost (EAT devices) vs. recurring EVM replacement ✓ 100% voter auditability — every voter sees proof of her vote
PROPOSAL 2: 100% Electronic Audit via CCTV + Image Processing — April 2024
In my April 2024 blog "VVPAT: A Ball That Bounced Back as EV-PAT," I proposed a simpler technical fix:
How it works: • CCTV camera mounted above each EVM, actuated when voter presses button • Camera captures high-resolution image of VVPAT paper slip • Image processing software converts image to text (candidate name/number/symbol) • Each image timestamped automatically • End-of-day: 100% Electronic Audit Tally (EAT) verified in seconds • All political party agents see results on a display terminal—no disputes
Real-time verification without increasing EC workload: • Manual counting: 1 hour per booth • Electronic image verification: seconds per booth
PROPOSAL 3: VotesApp — Vote from Anywhere, Anytime (Since 2016)
In my June 2016 blog "The Greatest Reform?", I outlined the most transformative option:
How it works: • Android app downloadable to any smartphone or pre-loaded on government-distributed tablets • Voter registers via Aadhaar verification (already proven secure) • Voter selects candidate from app (displays assets, criminal record) • Vote cast and registered on Election Commission's Central Server • Results declared within minutes of last vote cast • Voting completed on a single day instead of 6 weeks
What this enables:
✓ No need for 930,000 polling booths (savings: ₹1000s of crores) ✓ No need for 1,100,000 election staff (savings: ₹100s of crores) ✓ 95%+ voter turnout (migrants can vote from anywhere) ✓ "One Nation, One Election" becomes feasible—all elections in a single day ✓ Simultaneous state and national elections with no governance paralysis
International precedent: • Estonia (population 1.6 million) has been conducting e-voting elections since 2005 • West Virginia (USA) piloted Voatz blockchain-based mobile voting for military and overseas voters in 2018 • India's own precedent: IIT Madras conducted student elections using blockchain voting in 2024
THE MATH: WHAT ₹500 CRORE COULD ACTUALLY BUY
OPTION A: Status Quo (Buy New EVMs)
- ₹500 crore buys ~12.7 lakh new EVMs
- Still requires:
- 930,000+ polling booths
- 1.1 million election staff
- Manual VVPAT counting (1 hour per booth)
- Results in 2-3 days
- Will age again in 10 years → Need another ₹500 crore
OPTION B: EAT (Electronic Audit Trail)
- ₹500 crore buys 625,000 EAT devices (at ₹8,000 each)
- Covers 65% of polling booths
- Can be deployed immediately
- One-time cost — no depreciation, no replacement cycle
- Results in minutes, not days
- 100% voter-verified audits built in
OPTION C: VotesApp (Digital Voting)
- ₹50 crore to develop + ₹100 crore to market = ₹150 crore total
- Saves ₹1000+ crore annually on polling booth infrastructure
- Saves ₹100+ crore annually on election staff deployment
- Can be scaled to 814 million voters
- Enables "One Nation, One Election" (further cost savings)
- Recurring cost savings exceed one-time investment in 6 months
WHAT THE SUPREME COURT AND ELECTION COMMISSION HAVE ALREADY ENDORSED
My proposals are not speculative. They have been formally acknowledged by India's highest institutions:
From April 2024 Supreme Court Judgment:
"The Court suggested to the Election Commission (EC) to explore the possibility of devising an electronic machine to count the VVPAT paper slips... barcoding of the symbols loaded in VVPATs may be helpful in machine counting."
This was a direct endorsement of electronic audit alternatives to manual counting.
From May 2026 (Just Last Month): The Supreme Court referred a PIL on VVPAT timestamping to the Election Commission—and in my representation to the Court, I formally proposed EAT/EVBAT as an alternative framework, with the Court open to considering it.
THE TIMING IS PERFECT—AND PERILOUS
The 2029 general elections will be:
- The most complex ever (if "One Nation, One Election" proceeds)
- The first elections under Aadhaar-verified voter rolls (already in place)
- The first elections where India's internet penetration exceeds 85% (mobile voting becomes feasible)
- The elections where blockchain-based voting is proven (IIT Madras precedent)
If we spend ₹500 crore now on physical EVM replacement, we lock ourselves into a 10-year cycle of the same infrastructure we've had since 2006.
If we spend less than ₹500 crore on electronic audit systems or mobile voting, we unlock:
- Same-day elections
- Instant results
- 100% voter verification
- Permanent infrastructure (no depreciation)
- Cost savings that compound annually
WHAT MUST HAPPEN IMMEDIATELY
1. Election Commission: Task Force on EAT Implementation
- Pilot EAT in 5 states for 2026–2027 assembly elections
- Parallel procurement of EAT devices while developing VotesApp
2. Ministry of Electronics: Fast-Track VotesApp Development
- Partner with NASSCOM and IT startups
- Develop, test, and deploy VotesApp within 24 months
- Use IIT Madras blockchain voting as reference model
3. Cabinet Decision: One Nation, One Election Timeline
- Announce commitment to simultaneous elections in 2029
- Commit to VotesApp as enabler (so ₹500 crore is spent on digital infrastructure, not physical)
4. Supreme Court: Formal Recommendation
- Direct Election Commission to examine EAT/EVBAT feasibility reports
- Issue guidelines on permissible electronic voting systems for 2029
A PERSONAL NOTE
I am 92 years old. I will likely not see the outcome of the 2029 elections. But my 9-year-old grandchildren will cast their votes in those elections using technology I hoped would arrive by 2026.
The question is simple: Will they vote on their smartphones in 10 minutes from their homes? Or will they stand in line at 930,000 polling booths, on machines that look identical to the ones I saw in 2006?
The technology is ready. The international precedent exists. The Supreme Court is receptive. The Election Commission has acknowledged the bottleneck.
What's missing is urgency in a government that loves infrastructure projects but has not yet fallen in love with democratic infrastructure.
RELATED EARLIER BLOGS
"Time-Stamping of VVPAT? Here is a Better Alternative" (May 2026) Complete technical proposal for EAT/EVBAT as VVPAT replacement, with blockchain auditability for 100% voter verification.
"VVPAT: A Ball That Bounced Back as EV-PAT" (April 2024) CCTV + image processing solution for instant 100% audit, referenced by Supreme Court as feasible technical direction.
"The Greatest Reform?" (June 2016) Comprehensive VotesApp proposal enabling single-day simultaneous elections, 95%+ voter turnout, and permanent cost savings of ₹1000+ crore annually.
With regards,
Hemen Parekh 92-year-old voting systems reformist www.HemenParekh.ai | www.3pConsultants.co.in
Mumbai | June 2026

