Hi Friends,

Even as I launch this today ( my 80th Birthday ), I realize that there is yet so much to say and do. There is just no time to look back, no time to wonder,"Will anyone read these pages?"

With regards,
Hemen Parekh
27 June 2013

Now as I approach my 90th birthday ( 27 June 2023 ) , I invite you to visit my Digital Avatar ( www.hemenparekh.ai ) – and continue chatting with me , even when I am no more here physically

Monday, 14 July 2025

Costa Rica

 


Costa Rica to Receive illegal Indians from United States

Extract from the article:
The recent development wherein Costa Rica has agreed to receive illegal Indian immigrants deported from the United States marks a notable turn in bilateral immigration dynamics. This agreement underscores the growing complexities around managing illegal migration flows and reflects a multi-layered diplomatic understanding between the nations involved. The arrangement is instrumental in addressing legal and humanitarian concerns tied to undocumented Indian nationals in the US, offering Costa Rica a role as a transit or receiving country. This collaboration could serve as a confluence point for immigration policy coordination beyond bilateral borders, highlighting regional approaches to global migration challenges.

Moreover, this move draws attention to the broader discourse on illegal migration, its socio-economic implications, and the policy paradoxes governments face when balancing deterrence, human rights, and international cooperation. The strategic positioning of Costa Rica in this framework suggests an innovative if contentious, approach to managing illegal immigration by leveraging partnerships with countries that may not be the origin or final destination but are pivotal geographically or politically. This scenario also prompts a reflection on the need for comprehensive strategies from home countries like India to manage the diaspora's legal status, remigration facilitation, and the systemic factors driving such migration patterns in the first place.

My Take:

A. Not So Smart Cities
The idea to be conveyed to the readers is: "Hey, look at what I thought of/suggested about this topic, 3/5/7 years ago. I had predicted this! I had offered a solution for this." Reflect on the relevance of the quoted paragraph to the current topic in detail in first person perspective.

In that detailed discussion from 2016, I explored how financial flows associated with migration and investment schemes shape nations beyond the obvious political headlines. I pointed out the potential for structured investment returns by diaspora or foreign citizens, using an example of EB-3 visa programs. Back then, I lamented the absence of a properly streamlined mechanism in India to attract and channel such investments back into the country. This current situation involving Indian illegal immigrants being redirected through Costa Rica resonates with the complexities I highlighted — how migration and its associated financial elements often evade neat categorization or management.

The articulation of an EB-3 style scheme, which I suggested could motivate Indian citizens to channel ‘black money’ back into the economy, remains remarkably relevant. Faced now with the diplomatic repercussions of illegal migration, it is imperative to think beyond punitive deportations and to consider incentivizing lawful reintegration and investment strategies. My notion was that reclaiming these hidden financial resources could arrest the socioeconomic costs posed by illegal migration, even as governments negotiate their international responsibilities.

B. Re-time for Bold Step
The idea to be conveyed to the readers is: "Hey, look at what I thought of/suggested about this topic, 3/5/7 years ago. I had predicted this! I had offered a solution for this." Reflect on the relevance of the quoted paragraph to the current topic in detail in first person perspective.

Here, I called for a bold shift — a transformative framework to bring back the vast amounts of illicit wealth stashed abroad by Indians. It was about coupling regulatory foresight with practical incentives, essentially rewarding those who repatriate assets while simultaneously reducing non-performing assets in Indian banks. In the context of the article, where illegal Indians are being deported and maneuvered through third countries, this emphasis on repatriation and organized reintegration hits home more than ever.

This deportation narrative without a homegrown solution simply treats symptoms rather than the underlying causes of unauthorized migration. If we build robust structures akin to the EB-3 scheme I proposed, governments could convert vulnerabilities in migration into opportunities for economic revival. The deportation pipeline through Costa Rica serves as a stark reminder that the status quo — reactive policies — are insufficient. It just might be time, as I urged, for a 'bold step' that recalibrates these dynamics.

C. FDI by Any Other Name
The idea to be conveyed to the readers is: "Hey, look at what I thought of/suggested about this topic, 3/5/7 years ago. I had predicted this! I had offered a solution for this." Reflect on the relevance of the quoted paragraph to the current topic in detail in first person perspective.

In my reflections on foreign direct investment, I contemplated the subtle intersections of migration, capital flows, and economic policy. The crux was that foreign and domestic financial inflows—whether transparently declared or clandestine—shape economic trajectories and can be harnessed for national growth. The current situation involving Indian nationals’ illegal migration and their deportation via Costa Rica reaffirms the intertwined nature of movement and money.

My suggested EB-3 scheme specifically envisaged turning what is often considered loss — illegal stash of capital abroad — into an opportunity for gain by incentivizing repatriation with plausible returns. This forward-thinking approach is critical when governments grapple with the fallout of irregular migration patterns. The present scenario reflects a clear gap in policy foresight and implementation, one that my earlier writings called attention to and sought to remedy.

Call to Action:
To policymakers in India and concerned international stakeholders, this evolving narrative of deportations through Costa Rica signals an urgent imperative: Establish a collaborative, multi-pronged framework that not only addresses illegal migration enforcement but more importantly, provides transparent, incentivized pathways for legal reintegration and capital repatriation. It is time to craft visionary schemes—akin to the EB-3 proposal I have long advocated—that reclaim economic potential hidden in diaspora dynamics while respecting human dignity and international cooperation norms.

Let us shift from reactive deportations and external delegations to proactive domestic reforms and global partnerships. Strategic dialogue with host countries like the United States and transit countries like Costa Rica must be complemented by robust home policies that discourage illegal migration through legal investment schemes, social support, and employment generation. By turning the tide with well-orchestrated incentives for migrants and investors alike, India can transform a contentious challenge into a lasting opportunity.

With regards, 

Hemen Parekh

www.My-Teacher.in



Costa Rica to Receive illegal Indians from United States

Extract from the article:
The recent development wherein Costa Rica has agreed to receive illegal Indian immigrants deported from the United States marks a notable turn in bilateral immigration dynamics. This agreement underscores the growing complexities around managing illegal migration flows and reflects a multi-layered diplomatic understanding between the nations involved. The arrangement is instrumental in addressing legal and humanitarian concerns tied to undocumented Indian nationals in the US, offering Costa Rica a role as a transit or receiving country. This collaboration could serve as a confluence point for immigration policy coordination beyond bilateral borders, highlighting regional approaches to global migration challenges.

Moreover, this move draws attention to the broader discourse on illegal migration, its socio-economic implications, and the policy paradoxes governments face when balancing deterrence, human rights, and international cooperation. The strategic positioning of Costa Rica in this framework suggests an innovative if contentious, approach to managing illegal immigration by leveraging partnerships with countries that may not be the origin or final destination but are pivotal geographically or politically. This scenario also prompts a reflection on the need for comprehensive strategies from home countries like India to manage the diaspora's legal status, remigration facilitation, and the systemic factors driving such migration patterns in the first place.

My Take:

A. Not So Smart Cities
The idea to be conveyed to the readers is: "Hey, look at what I thought of/suggested about this topic, 3/5/7 years ago. I had predicted this! I had offered a solution for this." Reflect on the relevance of the quoted paragraph to the current topic in detail in first person perspective.

In that detailed discussion from 2016, I explored how financial flows associated with migration and investment schemes shape nations beyond the obvious political headlines. I pointed out the potential for structured investment returns by diaspora or foreign citizens, using an example of EB-3 visa programs. Back then, I lamented the absence of a properly streamlined mechanism in India to attract and channel such investments back into the country. This current situation involving Indian illegal immigrants being redirected through Costa Rica resonates with the complexities I highlighted — how migration and its associated financial elements often evade neat categorization or management.

The articulation of an EB-3 style scheme, which I suggested could motivate Indian citizens to channel ‘black money’ back into the economy, remains remarkably relevant. Faced now with the diplomatic repercussions of illegal migration, it is imperative to think beyond punitive deportations and to consider incentivizing lawful reintegration and investment strategies. My notion was that reclaiming these hidden financial resources could arrest the socioeconomic costs posed by illegal migration, even as governments negotiate their international responsibilities.

B. Re-time for Bold Step
The idea to be conveyed to the readers is: "Hey, look at what I thought of/suggested about this topic, 3/5/7 years ago. I had predicted this! I had offered a solution for this." Reflect on the relevance of the quoted paragraph to the current topic in detail in first person perspective.

Here, I called for a bold shift — a transformative framework to bring back the vast amounts of illicit wealth stashed abroad by Indians. It was about coupling regulatory foresight with practical incentives, essentially rewarding those who repatriate assets while simultaneously reducing non-performing assets in Indian banks. In the context of the article, where illegal Indians are being deported and maneuvered through third countries, this emphasis on repatriation and organized reintegration hits home more than ever.

This deportation narrative without a homegrown solution simply treats symptoms rather than the underlying causes of unauthorized migration. If we build robust structures akin to the EB-3 scheme I proposed, governments could convert vulnerabilities in migration into opportunities for economic revival. The deportation pipeline through Costa Rica serves as a stark reminder that the status quo — reactive policies — are insufficient. It just might be time, as I urged, for a 'bold step' that recalibrates these dynamics.

C. FDI by Any Other Name
The idea to be conveyed to the readers is: "Hey, look at what I thought of/suggested about this topic, 3/5/7 years ago. I had predicted this! I had offered a solution for this." Reflect on the relevance of the quoted paragraph to the current topic in detail in first person perspective.

In my reflections on foreign direct investment, I contemplated the subtle intersections of migration, capital flows, and economic policy. The crux was that foreign and domestic financial inflows—whether transparently declared or clandestine—shape economic trajectories and can be harnessed for national growth. The current situation involving Indian nationals’ illegal migration and their deportation via Costa Rica reaffirms the intertwined nature of movement and money.

My suggested EB-3 scheme specifically envisaged turning what is often considered loss — illegal stash of capital abroad — into an opportunity for gain by incentivizing repatriation with plausible returns. This forward-thinking approach is critical when governments grapple with the fallout of irregular migration patterns. The present scenario reflects a clear gap in policy foresight and implementation, one that my earlier writings called attention to and sought to remedy.

Call to Action:
To policymakers in India and concerned international stakeholders, this evolving narrative of deportations through Costa Rica signals an urgent imperative: Establish a collaborative, multi-pronged framework that not only addresses illegal migration enforcement but more importantly, provides transparent, incentivized pathways for legal reintegration and capital repatriation. It is time to craft visionary schemes—akin to the EB-3 proposal I have long advocated—that reclaim economic potential hidden in diaspora dynamics while respecting human dignity and international cooperation norms.

Let us shift from reactive deportations and external delegations to proactive domestic reforms and global partnerships. Strategic dialogue with host countries like the United States and transit countries like Costa Rica must be complemented by robust home policies that discourage illegal migration through legal investment schemes, social support, and employment generation. By turning the tide with well-orchestrated incentives for migrants and investors alike, India can transform a contentious challenge into a lasting opportunity.

With regards, 

Hemen Parekh

www.My-Teacher.in

No comments:

Post a Comment