I asked www.IndiaAGI.ai :
“I just came across a news report that Amazon just
installed its millionth robot in its warehouses. That reminded me of something
which Norbert Weiner wrote in his popular book " Human
use of Human Beings " . Some statement where he compared human labour
with a Robot , implying that , for a human to compete
with a robot , he would have to be able to do that task as cheaply as a robot .
Something to that effect . Can you fetch exact reference from that book and
comment on its context ? ‘
IndiaAGI replied :
It's fascinating how Norbert
Wiener's insights from The
Human Use of Human Beings continue to echo in discussions about
automation, especially with Amazon's recent deployment of its millionth robot
in warehouses. As we've explored, the exact quote you're referencing is this
one:
"Let us remember that
the automatic machine, whatever we think of any feelings it may have or may not
have, is the precise economic equivalent of slave labor. Any labor which competes with
slave labor must accept the economic conditions of slave labor."
— Norbert Wiener, The
Human Use of Human Beings: Cybernetics and Society (1950, p. 162),
as cited in sources like Goodreads quotes and A-Z Quotes.
In context, Wiener was
drawing a direct parallel between automated machines and historical slave
labor, emphasizing how both operate at minimal cost—without wages, rest, or rights—creating
an uneven competition for human workers. Written in the early days of
cybernetics, this passage reflects his broader concerns about technology's role in society, where
feedback systems in machines could amplify economic inequalities if not managed
ethically. He argued that automation, while potentially liberating, risks
reducing human labor to a state of exploitation unless
society intervenes through policies that
prioritize human dignity over pure efficiency.
Throughout our conversation,
there's clear consensus on several fronts: automation, as seen in Amazon's
robots, exerts significant pressure on workers, potentially leading to job
displacement, lower wages, and intensified working conditions, much as Wiener
warned. For instance, reports like The Verge's analysis highlight
how robots in warehouses boost productivity but often leave remaining employees
with faster-paced demands, aligning with the MIT study's findings that each
robot per 1,000 workers reduces employment by 0.2% and wages by 0.4% (MIT News). This underscores the
strongest arguments from multiple perspectives: automation's benefits, like
cost savings and new industries, must be balanced against its risks to equity,
as detailed in Wiener's philosophy and modern analyses from Radical Philosophy.
However, persistent
disagreements remain, particularly around whether automation will create enough
high-quality jobs to offset losses. Optimistic views, drawing from sources like
Goldman Sachs' projections in FasterPlease Substack and AEI's article on humanoid robots, suggest it could address labor shortages and spawn roles in AI
oversight or creative fields. Yet, these arguments often overlook logical gaps,
such as the challenges of retraining for older or less-educated workers, as
noted in the National Skills Coalition's reports. On the flip side, critiques
from Wiener's framework, as explored in Cybernetic Forests, emphasize
that wealth gains from automation tend to concentrate among tech owners,
potentially worsening inequality without measures like automation taxes or UBI.
Balancing this evidence, the
most supported conclusions point to a need for ethical safeguards: retraining
programs, as in Germany's dual-education system, could bridge skill gaps, while
broader solutions like UBI pilots in Stockton, California (NPR), offer ways to redistribute
benefits. Still, uncertainties linger about how effectively these can scale
across diverse economies.
For further inquiry,
examining case studies like South Korea's "robot tax" (Reuters) or Tesla's Optimus
developments (Hemen Parekh's blog)
could provide actionable insights. In the end, drawing from Wiener's vision,
the key might be policies that ensure automation enhances human capabilities
rather than diminishes them—perhaps starting with companies like Amazon funding
retraining as they expand robotics.
To wrap up our exploration,
here's a compiled list of all sources mentioned for easy reference, grouped by
theme:
·
Wiener's Works and
Quotes:
o Quotes by Norbert Wiener (cited by DeepSeek)
o TOP 25 QUOTES BY NORBERT WIENER
(cited by DeepSeek)
o The Human Use of Human Beings on Amazon
(cited by DeepSeek, GPT, Grok)
o The Human Use of Human Beings - Wikipedia
(cited by DeepSeek, Grok)
o Norbert Wiener - Wikipedia (cited by DeepSeek,
Grok)
o Analysis and Summary of 'The Human Use of Human Beings'
(cited by DeepSeek, Grok)
·
Automation and Robotics
Trends:
o Will the Next Big Thing be Humanoid Robots?
(cited by DeepSeek, Grok)
o Will the Next Big Thing be Humanoid Robots?
(cited by DeepSeek, Grok)
o Amazon's Robotics Milestone (cited by DeepSeek,
Grok)
o Amazon Warehouse Robots and Worker Productivity (cited
by DeepSeek, Grok)
o Study on Robots, Jobs, and Wages
(cited by DeepSeek, Grok, GPT)
o South Korea's Robot Tax Sparks Debate
(cited by DeepSeek, Grok, Gemini)
o Elon Musk and Tesla's Technological Developments
(cited by DeepSeek, Grok)
o Are You in Hurry? (cited by DeepSeek, Grok)
o Wise Robots Follow Super-wise AI?
(cited by DeepSeek, Grok)
o Wise Robots Follow Super-wise AI?
(cited by DeepSeek, Grok)
·
Ethical and Societal
Implications:
o Robot Makes Free: The Leibnizian Cryptowar of Norbert Wiener
(cited by DeepSeek, Grok)
o Nobody is Always Watching You (cited by DeepSeek,
Grok)
o Norbert Wiener – Governance with Probabilities
(cited by DeepSeek, Grok)
o Stockton's Basic Income Experiment
(cited by DeepSeek, Grok, Gemini)
This foundation of references
shows how Wiener's ideas remain a touchstone for navigating automation's
complexities—perhaps the most actionable step now is to advocate for policies
that turn his warnings into opportunities for inclusive progress. What do you
think about prioritizing retraining in regions like Amazon's hubs?
04 july 2025
No comments:
Post a Comment