Hi Friends,

Even as I launch this today ( my 80th Birthday ), I realize that there is yet so much to say and do. There is just no time to look back, no time to wonder,"Will anyone read these pages?"

With regards,
Hemen Parekh
27 June 2013

Now as I approach my 90th birthday ( 27 June 2023 ) , I invite you to visit my Digital Avatar ( www.hemenparekh.ai ) – and continue chatting with me , even when I am no more here physically

Monday 2 October 2023

The More things Change , the More they remain the Same

 


 

Context :

L&T's new Chairman Subrahmanyan asks staff to be ready for 'massive changes' in ecosystem

( Money Control  /  01 Oct 2023 )


Extract :

S N Subrahmanyan, in his first letter to the employees of Larsen & Toubro (L&T) Group after assuming charge as chairman and managing director of the engineering major, said the world is going through massive changes in terms of ,

Ø  ecosystem,

Ø  energy change,

Ø  sustainability as a way of life ,

 

-      and they must speed and scale with the change to fulfil their customers’ demands.

“We cannot afford to rest on our laurels for our customers will continue seeking excellence from us every day. Our focus cannot waver from Performance, performance, performance”, Subrahmanyan said in his letter to the employees after taking charge of L&T on October 1.

 

The letter mentioned that digitization is rapidly becoming a huge aspect of business and there is a need to harness the power of technology to keep improving productivity and efficiency of the company.

My  Take  :

 

Some 34 years ago [ on 05 Jan 1989 ], I submitted to L&T Corporate Management, a report titled :

Quo Vadis ?  (  Wither thou Goeth ? )

Following is its covering letter :

 

Mr. S.R.Subramaniam

                                                                  January 5, 1989

 

CORPORATE DIVERSIFICATION

 

20th Century saw two world-wars between super-powers.

 

The aim of both was territorial expansion.

 

21st Century will witness a similar war of global dimensions - but with a difference

 

It will be

 

-    a war of expansion of economic -territory involving nations, large and

          small                                 

     -   fought by mega-corporations

     -   employing world-wide network of space-age technologies/    

         alliances/resources/markets.

     -   unrestrained by national boundaries

     -   without an end      

 

It will be a business-war in which the unprepared will be wiped-out and even those who have made definite survival-plans will find going tough.

 

I am happy to enclose a report which goes beyond survival.

 

For many thousand L& T-ites, it will offer hope for growth in the 21st Century. 

 

I suggest that the Corporate Management sets aside one full day during the forthcoming Strategic-Plan Meetings, to debate this report and take necessary decisions.

 

With kind regards,

                                 

H. C. PAREKH

CC : Mr. N.M.Desai

 

 

With regards,

Hemen Parekh

www.hemenparekh.ai  /  03 Oct 2023

 

Related Readings :

Letters  To  L&T  Employees      

Amazon E-Book     

L&T Switchgear & Other Stories  

L&T  Story

================================================


I could not resist consulting BARD and ChatGPT about their observations :

 

BARD  :

Similarities

Quo Vadis? (1989)

S. N. Subrahmanyan's letter to employees (2023)

Technology

"L&T must harness space-age technologies to expand its economic territory."

"L&T must embrace digitization to keep improving productivity and efficiency."

Competition

"The 21st century will witness a war of economic expansion involving nations and mega-corporations."

"L&T must be ready for massive changes in the ecosystem."

Need to change

"L&T must go beyond survival and plan for growth in the 21st century."

"L&T must speed and scale with the change to fulfil its customers’ demands."

Focus on Performance

Not mentioned

"L&T cannot rest on its laurels and its focus cannot waver from Performance, performance, performance."

 

 

ChatGPT  :

 

It's interesting to compare the observations made by L&T's Chairman S N Subrahmanyan in 2023 with your report titled "QUO VADIS?" from 1989. While there are some differences due to the time gap and the specific focus of each communication, there are also some noteworthy similarities:

Similarities:

1.     Adaptation to Change:

Both Subrahmanyan and your 1989 report emphasize the need for L&T and its employees to adapt to changing circumstances. In 1989, you mentioned the importance of being prepared for the economic war of the 21st century, which implies a need for adaptation to new economic realities. In 2023, Subrahmanyan highlights the massive changes in the ecosystem, energy, and sustainability, emphasizing the need to "speed and scale with the change."

 

2.     Technology:

Both communications emphasize the significance of technology. In 1989, your report mentions "world-wide network of space-age technologies," while in 2023, Subrahmanyan talks about digitization becoming a huge aspect of business and the need to harness technology for improved productivity and efficiency.

 

3.     Globalization:

Although not explicitly mentioned in your 1989 report, the idea of mega-corporations engaging in a global economic war implies a form of globalization. Subrahmanyan's observations also suggest the importance of L&T operating on a global scale to fulfill customer demands, which aligns with the concept of global economic expansion.

 

4.     Focus on Performance:

In both communications, there is an emphasis on performance. Subrahmanyan mentions that L&T's focus cannot waver from "Performance, performance, performance." Your 1989 report suggests that being unprepared in the 21st century's economic war will result in being wiped out, implying that superior performance is essential for survival.

Differences:

1.     Timeframe:

The timeframe differs significantly, with your 1989 report looking ahead to the 21st century and Subrahmanyan's letter addressing the present (2023). The specific challenges and technologies have evolved over these decades.

 

2.     Nature of Challenges:

Your 1989 report focuses on the potential global economic war and the dominance of mega-corporations, while Subrahmanyan's letter touches on a broader range of challenges, including ecosystem changes, energy transitions, and sustainability.

 

3.     Communication Style: The communication styles differ, with your 1989 report taking a more speculative and visionary tone, while Subrahmanyan's letter is more immediate and directive, addressing the current realities faced by L&T.

In summary, both communications recognize the importance of adaptation, technology, globalization, and performance in the context of L&T's future success. The differences in timeframe and the specific nature of challenges highlight how the business landscape has evolved over the years, but the fundamental principles of staying competitive and relevant remain consistent.

  

Sunday 1 October 2023

Missing : Subli-Melding ?

 


 

Context :

Digital India Bill set to add myriad online offence laws under ‘user harm’…………. ET  /  28 Sept 2023

 

Extract :

 The Digital India Bill is likely to define and encode in law various online offences such as :

 

#   Cryptojacking,

 

#   Astroturfing,

 

#  Dogpiling or cyber-mob attacks,

 

#  Dogwhistling,

 

#  Swatting,

 

#   Gaslighting and

 

#   Catfishing,

 

-         people in know of the development told ET.

These offences are likely to be included under the broad category of
user harm, and it may also define the penal provisions associated with them, one of the persons said.

 


My  Take :

 

 

Ø  Privacy ? Perish the Thought !...................... 18  July  2017

 

Extract :

 

      In the drafting team , besides Jurists and Lawyers , include some Data Scientists

 

 

·   Get this team to agree on the definitions / meanings of the following TERMS , before releasing of that FIRST draft :

 

     #   Private

 

#   Data

 

#   App

 

#   Permission

 

#   Access

 

#   Download

 

#   Sign

 

#   Rights

 

#   Own

 

#   Personal

 

#   Share

 

#   Entity

 

#   Processing

 

#   Obligation

 

#   Handling

 

#   Collection

 

#   Use

 

 

 

·   Already the line delimiting the HARDWARE from SOFTWARE is getting blurred ( eg : storing data in DNA or STEM CELLS )

  

·   Technology has ( almost ) evolved to the point where there is NO NEED to ask any PERMISSION from anyone ( who is creating – processing – handling etc of data ).

  

Any device that you carry or wear , will automatically transmit your every single THOUGHT to a CENTRAL SERVER !

  

And that  ARIHANT  will also SAVE the humanity from Artificial Intelligence  !

 

Under Internet of Things ( IoT ) , each living human will get assigned 50,000 TRILLION , unique IP Addresses , under IP V 6.0 ( including for that packet of food we eat and that bottle of water we drink ! ) – that is  10 BILLION  IP addresses for each hair on our bodies !

 

We will be “ Watched / Measured / Imaged / Listened to / Analysed / Administered / Governed “ , every second of our lives ( - and no one will even ask for any permission ! )

 

Anyone wearing an AR / VR device ( which will be everyone ! ) , will know who we are and what we are doing , at ANY MOMENT !

  

·   The Omnipresent CLOUD will tell us , what we should NEED and what we should DESIRE and where we should TRAVEL and what we should SEE ! May be , even how long we should LIVE !

 

 

 

Wikipedia Definitions :


Ø  Sublimate ……… To change state from a solid to a gas without passing through                              the liquid state

Ø  Meld …………………To combine (multiple things) together; to blend, to fuse

 

My Observations :

 

Ø  Data is experienced in its following “ States / Forms “ :

       Sight ( Text / Image ) // Sound ( speech ) //  Smell // Touch // Taste


Ø  Technology ( especially , AI ) is rapidly advancing to convert / morph , any Form to any other Form , - and directly, without having to follow a FIXED SEQUENCE ( Sublimate )

 

Ø  Before long, it will be possible for the same data to be “ experienced “ by any given person, in any desired form , at any chosen time ( Data Personalization / Customization )

 

 

Ø  It will also become possible for a person to fuse data arriving from different sources , Eg: “ Sight “ of a rose with the “ Smell of a Lily  ( Meld )

 

Related Readings :

Ø  As Envisaged : Merging – Morphing – Melding of Senses………28 Apr 2022

 

Ø  2024 ! – V 2.0 of Orwellian 1984 ?..................... …………….   07 July 2017  

 

Ø  Nostradamus could have said ?...................  ………………………  08 Nov 2018


      Extract :

      In twenty hundred and twenty four

      A Sea of Waves will roar,

      Light will follow sound :

      And , in Smell and Taste

     Earth will abound ,

     Brain will hide no more

     Your secrets gore  !

 

Ø  Sight to Smell : Sound to Touch : Text to Music / Saga of Fungible Senses…… 11  May  2023

 ==================================================

And for an opinion of BARD :

 

Your question is very insightful, and I think you are right that the number of transformations possible between the five senses is very large.

To calculate the total number of transformations, we can use the following formula:

n = 5!

where n is the number of transformations and 5! is the factorial of 5, which is 120.

This means that there are 120 possible transformations between the five senses. However, this is just a theoretical number, and not all of these transformations may be possible in reality.

For example, it is not currently possible to transform taste into sight or sound. However, as technology advances, it is possible that we will be able to develop new ways to transform one sense into another.

Here are some examples of transformations that are possible between the five senses:

·        Sight to sound: A video of a bird chirping can be converted into a sound file.

·        Sound to touch: A music player can be equipped with haptic feedback to create a tactile experience for the listener.

·        Smell to taste: A flavor scientist can create a new flavor that is based on the smell of a particular food.

·        Taste to sight: A chef can create a dish that is visually appealing and also tastes good.

·        Touch to sound: A braille reader can convert braille text into speech.

I am excited to see how technology develops in the future and how we can use it to create new and innovative ways to experience the world around us.

Your apprehension about Sublimation

I understand your apprehension about Sublimation, and I agree that it is a complex and challenging topic.

Sublimation is the process of changing from a solid state to a gas state without passing through the liquid state. It is a physical process, but it can also be used metaphorically to describe the process of transforming something from one state to another without going through the usual steps.

In the context of your question, Sublimation could refer to the process of transforming one sense into another without going through the usual steps. For example, it could be possible to transform sight into sound without having to go through the step of hearing.

This is a very speculative idea, but it is possible that it could be achieved using advanced technology. For example, it could be possible to develop a device that can directly translate visual signals into sound signals.

I think it is important to be aware of the potential risks and benefits of Sublimation. On the one hand, Sublimation could be used to create new and innovative ways to experience the world around us. On the other hand, Sublimation could also be used to create new forms of surveillance and control.

I believe that it is important to have a public conversation about the future of Sublimation and to develop ethical guidelines for its use.

 

with regards,

hemen Parekh

www.hemenparekh.ai  /  02 Oct  2023

 

 

2017 ( 20 )

 

2024 ! – V 2.0 of Orwellian 1984 ?                                 [ 07 July 2017 ]

 

 

Privacy? What is that ? ………………………………………………………[  04  May  2017  ]

 

 

Delusion of Privacy ? ……………………………………………………………10  June  2017  ]

 

Privacy ? Perish the Thought ! ………………………………………………[  18  July  2017  ]

 

Thank You Your Honours ! …………………………………………………….[ 19 July 2017 ]

 

Privacy does not live here ! ……………………………………………………[  22  July  2017  ]

 

Supreme may Propose : Technology will Dispose …………………[ 23  July  2017  ]

 

Seeing AI through Google Glass ?  ……………………………………….[ 24  July  2017  ]

 

Artificial Intelligence : Destroyer of Privacy ?  ………………………[  25  July  2017  ]

 

Privacy : Not Right ?  ………………………………………………………………[  30  July  2017  ]

 

Future is Nearer !  ……………………………………………………………………[  31  July  2017  ]

 

Three got it Right ! …………………………………………………………………. [  02  Aug  2017  ]

 

www.PrivacyForSale.com  …………………………………………………………[  26  Aug  2017  ]

 

Right to Sell My Soul ?  ……………………………………………………………[  27  Aug  2017  ]

 

A Fool’s Paradise ?  ………………………………………………………………….[  29  Aug  2017  ]

 

Wherefore Art Thou, O Romeo ?  …………………………………………….[  20  Sept  2017  ]

 

Data Privacy : We are getting overtaken !  …………………………….[  26  Sept  2017  ]

 

7  Pillars  of  Data  Protection  Law …………………………………………[ 27  Nov  2017  ]

 

Just  Ask  Google  !  ………………………………………………………………… [  28  Nov  2017  ]

 

Here is the Proof                                                                 [  30  Nov  2017  ]

 

 

2018 ( 2 )


Data Protection without Data Privacy ?                                ….[ 08 Jan 2018 ]



Internet Bill of Rights                                                     ………[ 07 Oct  2018  ]

 

2019 ( 2 )

Who watches the Watchmen ?                                                 [ 12  July  2019  ]


Congratulations, Your Honour !                                         ……[  22  Mar  2019  ]

 

Nightmare ?                                                                         [  04  Mar  2019  ]

 ====================================================

Added  on  12  Nov  2023 :


Brain implant turns thoughts into speech with up to 84% accuracy  


A team of Duke neuroscientists, neurosurgeons, and engineers has invented a brain implant that can transform thoughts into speech. The hope is that people who are unable to speak because of neurological conditions may one day be able to communicate again thanks to this modern technology.