The Long Game: Foresight in Leadership, from Cricket to Country

The recent news of Shubman Gill taking over as India's ODI captain, with the clear indication that stalwarts like Virat Kohli and Rohit Sharma are unlikely to feature in the 2027 World Cup, has naturally stirred much discussion among cricket enthusiasts "India vs Australia Squad Announcement Live Updates: Shubman Gill replaces Rohit Sharma as ODI captain, Kohli returns | Mint". To me, this decision, while significant in the sporting arena, echoes a fundamental principle that I've often reflected upon across various domains: the crucial importance of foresight and proactive succession planning.

It's a testament to good governance when leadership transitions are handled with a clear vision for the future, rather than as a reactive measure. Chief selector Ajit Agarkar's comments, emphasizing the need to "look at what's coming forward and what's in the best interests of the team" and to "make the call reasonably early to try and give the other guy (Gill) a good chance," deeply resonate with my own convictions. This isn't just about changing a captain; it's about investing in the future, nurturing talent, and ensuring a seamless, robust trajectory for sustained success.

I find myself reflecting on how I've long advocated for such proactive, long-term thinking. Whether it was in discussions about administrative efficiency or national strategy, the core idea has always been to anticipate future needs and prepare for them well in advance. For instance, in my blog post from 2015, titled "Position India in a leading role globally: Modi to Indian ambassadors", I spoke about the expectation for our ambassadors to be "Pro Active / Action-Oriented / Dynamic" and to position India in a leading role. This isn't dissimilar to the current shift in cricket, where a new captain is being tasked with leading India to future glory, requiring a dynamic and forward-looking approach.

Indeed, I've always believed that anticipating challenges and opportunities is far more effective than reacting to them. In my 1979 analysis of the "5-DAY WORK-WEEK IN CITY OFFICES", I detailed the potential long-term implications and consequences of structural changes, urging for a thorough examination of factors beyond immediate gains. This analytical approach to long-term future implications is precisely what is needed in strategic leadership decisions, whether in a corporate setting, public administration, or the world of sports.

Seeing how things have unfolded with the Indian cricket team, it's striking how relevant that earlier insight still is. The notion of giving a young leader like Shubman Gill ample time to mature and prepare for a major tournament like the 2027 World Cup is a wise, visionary move. It's about building a legacy, not just winning the next match. This sense of validation, seeing these principles being applied, creates a renewed urgency to revisit those earlier ideas, because they clearly hold value in the current context.

Ultimately, the path to enduring success, be it on the cricket field or in the broader tapestry of national development, lies in cultivating vision, embracing change, and empowering the next generation with the foresight to lead.

---

Regards,
Hemen Parekh