Hi Friends,

Even as I launch this today ( my 80th Birthday ), I realize that there is yet so much to say and do. There is just no time to look back, no time to wonder,"Will anyone read these pages?"

With regards,
Hemen Parekh
27 June 2013

Now as I approach my 90th birthday ( 27 June 2023 ) , I invite you to visit my Digital Avatar ( www.hemenparekh.ai ) – and continue chatting with me , even when I am no more here physically

Monday 27 July 2020

“ Court Action “ or “ New Regulatory Approach “ ?




Context :



Highlights :

The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission’s (ACCC) action in the Federal Court is the latest litigation Google has faced around the world over allegations of privacy breaches.

The commission alleges that the California-based company misled millions of Australians to obtain their consent and expand the scope of personal information that Google collects about users’ internet activity to target advertising.

The allegations arise from Google’s move in 2016 to start combining,

Ø   users’ personal information in their Google accounts with

Ø  information from the same users’ activity on non-Google sites

that used Google technology,...


Ø  The Competition and Markets Authority have taken aim at the U.S. tech giants in a report that recommends the British government adopt a new regulatory approach to governing big digital platforms making money from online ads.
=====================================================


Why are governments targeting Google ( alone ? ) for privacy breaches , when thousands of other websites are guilty of  the same crime ?


Answer is simple :

Ø  Among all the other websites, Google is the biggest and richest of these violators ( meaning, Google makes far more money from its “ Targeted Online Advt “ business, using USER’s PERSONAL DATA , than any other website )


Ø  It has the widest reach , in most countries ( except China )


Ø  It has largest number of users worldwide


Ø  It “ powers “ thousands of mobile apps – in return, gathering personal data of millions of people who use these apps


Ø  It enables internet-users to avoid submitting their PERSONAL DATA again and again, to thousands of websites by just clicking, “ Log me in with Google “- a great convenience ( no need to remember thousands of passwords )


Ø  Its Android Operating System powers ( perhaps ) 70 % of mobile phones worldwide

=========================================================


The right question to be asked by Regulators / Consumer Protection Bodies around the world, is NOT


Ø  While registering on Google, did users “ clearly / explicitly understand “ what all Personal Data about themselves, are they granting permission to Google to collect for those targeted advertisements AND for selling ( may be, bartering ) to other businesses ?



Right questions to be asked (of ourselves ), should be :

Ø  How soon can we put in place a “ NEW REGULATORY APPROACH to governing big digital platforms making money from online ads “ ?


Ø  How can such a NEW REGULATORY APPROACH ensure :

#  No Indian User ever need to REGISTER on any such website


#  All Indian Users to provide their PERSONAL DATA ( by registering ) on only ONE
    government owned / controlled website ( say, ww.IndiaDataCustodian.gov.in “)


#  All other websites to enable their use to Indians by clicking ,
     Log me in with  ww.IndiaDataCustodian.gov.in

#  All other websites can “ buy “ from ww.IndiaDataCustodian.gov.in , aggregated /
    anonymized PERSONAL DATA of 500 million users ( target demographic data )


#  Sale-proceeds to be distributed among Indian Citizen whose data got “ sold “ , in
     each such online PURCHASE TRANSACTION of Personal Data by any BUYER ( no
     revelation of Name / Contact Information of any user – only anonymized )


=========================================================


I have elaborated on the mechanism of such a New Regulatory Approach in my following email to the Cabinet Ministers :

SARAL   …………………………………………………………………………………………[  10  Feb  2019  ]



As to WHAT personal data ( of users ) can be MONETIZED through such a New Regulatory Approach, consider the following LEVELS , described in my mail :

Only Answer : a Statutory Warning  ……………………………………………….[ 10 Nov 2018 ]


 #    Data   Level   1  ………………  Personal Data   

#     Data   Level   2  ………………  Family  Data     

#     Data   Level   3   ………………  Contact Info     

#     Data   Level   4  ………………   Social Media Data ( websites-portals-apps etc ) 

#     Data   Level   5  ……………….  Cultural Exposure Data  

#     Data   Level   6  ……………….  Education  Qualifications Data  

#     Data   Level   7  ……………….  Languages Knowledge  Data  

#     Data   Level   8  ……………….  Job  Experience  Data  

#     Data   Level   9  ………………   Wealth – Income Data [ from Tax Returns ]  

#     Data   Level  10  ………………. Medical History Data   

========================================================

Related Explanatory E-Mails sent in past :

Digital Dividend from Demographic Data ………………………………………….[ 14 Feb 2019 ]


Privacy For Sale ………………………………………………………………………………….[ 26 Aug 2017 ]


=========================================================

CAUTION :

From following news-report, it would appear that, before long, Google may manage to collect all of your Personal Data, WITHOUT requiring you to REGISTER on its website and / or asking your permission ( even, indirect ! )

That lends urgency to implement my suggestion as soon as we can



Extract :  

Search engine giant Google is reportedly working on "smart tattoos" that which will be embedded with sensors and turn the human body into touchpads.
The idea is part of a wearable project from Google Research called "SkinMarks".
Google has provided funding to a group of researchers from Germany's Saarland University to develop the technology.
" This paper presents SkinMarks, an enabling technology for interaction on body landmarks.
SkinMarks are highly conformal interactive tattoos, which enable precisely localised input and output on five types of body landmarks", a white paper recently published by Saarland University noted.
======================================================

With regards,


Hemen Parekh  /  hcp@RecruitGuru.com  /  28  July  2020   

Sunday 26 July 2020

Origin of Everything ?




Ever since Albert Einstein published his  Theory of Relativity “ , scientists around the world have been wondering :


 Could there be a “ Theory of Everything “ ?


From time to time, some scientists have even postulated such theories. But no validation so far !


Bureaucrats in our Ministry of Commerce are currently engaged in a later-day version of this elusive quest to come up with, a theory on “ Origin of Everything


For each item being sold online in India, they want the seller – and the online platform – to declare its “ Country of Origin


Not an easy thing to establish, as following news report says :





Extract :

Unlike the EU or US, India does not have rules to determine what is meant by “ country of origin “ for purposes of Indian law, other than for the purposes of FTAs.


If the goods contain,


Ø  raw materials from Country A,

Ø  are assembled in County B, and

Ø  manufactured in Country C,


which is the “ country of origin “ ?


Most jurisdictions lay down a percentage of value-added as a kind of marker


=======================================================


 4 YEARS ago, I sent following email to Cabinet Ministers :

Missing the Woods for the Tree ?    ………………………………………………..[ 12 Aug 2016 ]

Where I wrote :

Entire cycle of Designing / Manufacturing / Marketing / Selling / Order-taking / Delivering / After-sales Servicing / Logistics / Collecting Payments / etc , will get spread so thinly across Countries / Continents / Companies / Individuals , that it will become next to impossible to keep track of " WHO " is adding " WHAT " value to the process , and " WHEN " , and from " WHERE " !  

No one will be able to unravel this GORDIAN KNOT
    
=========================================================

Then 2 YEARS ago, I sent following email :

E Commerce Definition : a Space Ship ?   ……………………………………….[ 05 July 2018 ]

 

Where I wrote :

 

And , as far as defining what is “ Made in India “ is concerned , I believe , government goes by “ Percentage of Value Addition “ locally

But , this is a very difficult and time-consuming exercise

Even when possible, its result hold good for a very short period in a dynamic situation

A manufactured “ local product “ could have hundreds of components ( both, local and imported )

And those “ local components “ could have “ imported “ raw materials or intermediates

These days , a product could be,

 *  patented in one country ( concept )

*  designed in another country

*  developed ( detail manufacturing drawings  ) in another country

*  components made all over the World

*  Sub-Assemblies ( of those components ) carried out in another country

*  Final Assembly done in another country

*  Packaging done in another country

*  Offered for sale on ONLINE e-commerce portals in another country

*  Marketed by agencies located all over the World

*  Delivered using manpower / drones / supply chains of several countries

*  Financed by funds from all over the world

At which “ Level  “ of Value Addition , does a product become “ local “ ?


And if I download a " Product Drawings / Design " over the internet and then " 3D Print " it in my garage ( using " imported " resins ) , then is that a " local " product ?

=========================================================

Then , a month back, I sent following e-mail :

Autobiography of an Appliance   ………………………………………………………[ 22 June 2020 ]

 

Where I wrote :

 

How much “ Value Addition “ ( as a percentage of total cost of production or selling price ) should take place in India, to qualify an appliance for “ Made in India “ tag ?


I am unaware of any official / authentic definition


To get a clear picture of how “ Value Additions “ take place in a chain of countries , before an appliance gets delivered to your home, consider the following ( over-simplification ) :

=======================================================

   Value-Addition is a Many Splendored Thing – in today’s Global Supply Chain

========================================================
    

PROCESS STAGE
OUTPUT
( at each stage of Process )
Country supplying Inputs to Processing Country
PROCESSING COUNTRY
( where value addition takes place using local manpower )
INPUTS at each Stage

( Value Addition )
MANPOWER COST as % of final total cost

( Value Added )
1
Iron Ore
India
Manpower
5 %
2
Ingots
India
Australia
Manpower
10 %
3
Bars
Australia
China
Manpower
10 %
4
Components
China
Indonesia
Manpower
10 %
5
Sub-Assy
Indonesia
Singapore
Manpower
25 %
6
Assembly
Singapore
South Korea
Manpower
30 %
7
Packaging and Dispatch
South Korea
India
Manpower
10 %
TOTAL
100 %


Obviously the scenario described above is an “ Over Simplification “ considering that , at each “ Stage of Processing “ ( in a given country ) , “ Inputs “ may come from many other countries ( not just one country )

====================================================

Related Reading :

 

SC agrees to hear plea for display of ‘Country of Origin' on products on e-commerce portals 


Petitioner :  Divya Jyoti Singh  /  divsjs@gmail.com
=============================================================================



Extract :

Ø  High export of mobile phones doesn’t mean they are being produced entirely here. According to the India Cellular and Electronics Association, mobile phone manufacturing units in the country have grown from just two in 2014 to 268 in 2018. But a deep dive into the data shows that more than being made in India, cell phones are mostly assembled in India


Ø  This is evident from the fact that despite having such a big number of factories, India’s value addition to mobile phone manufacturing has been hardly 10 per cent on an average as a Credit Suisse press release notes

 

=========================================================

With regards,

Hemen Parekh  /  hcp@RecruitGuru.com  /  27  July  2020