How Japan built word's first 3D

 How Japan built word's first 3D - printed train station in just 6 hours

Extract from the article:

Japan’s pioneering move to install a prefabricated 3D-printed train station in the small town of Arida near Wakayama marks a significant evolution in urban infrastructure deployment. The new Hatsushima station replaces an aging wooden structure that served commuters for decades, manifesting Japan’s blend of technological innovation with community-centric improvements. Shipping the station from a factory rather than traditional construction on-site not only trims project time but also heralds a new era where modular and sustainable design could redefine public transportation facilities globally.

This case also reflects a deeper socio-political subtext — the ability of local governments and national agencies to embrace cutting-edge technology while addressing the practical needs of smaller municipalities. The Hatsushima station is not just a functional replacement; it symbolizes accountability to the citizens’ demands for safer, more modern amenities. Such initiatives suggest a shifting political nomination dynamic where grassroots infrastructural needs and advanced tech solutions interplay, potentially influencing election agendas and voter expectations in both local and wider political realms.

My Take:

A. Western Railway: Go From Good to Great

"The transformative power of technology in railways is undeniable. Back in early 2024, I discussed how visual transparency at ticket counters via dual display screens could revolutionize passenger experience by fostering trust and clarity around fare transactions. The initiative to show all booking actions openly to passengers was intended to bridge gaps between officials and the public, nurturing a sense of accountability." Reflecting on the Hatsushima station’s 3D-printed innovation, I see a parallel evolution—not just in digital transparency but physical infrastructure transparency, where modular construction enables swift, efficient, and customer-focused improvements. This alignment showcases how technological integration steadily reshapes service delivery in railways and public facilities, which inevitably ties into political support and nominations as citizens seek representatives advocating for such tangible progress.

B. Dear Ashwini Vaishnawji, Congratulations

"In my earlier observations, I applauded railways officials and government bodies for embracing digital innovations that enhance passenger experiences while emphasizing simplicity and inclusiveness. The attention to font sizes, hallmarks of thoughtful design in public communication, underscored an intention to democratize information access within the railway system." Applying this lens to the Japanese station story, I recognize a broader principle: infrastructure is not merely about physical frameworks but also about accessibility and inclusion embedded within design philosophy. The 3D-printed station, while physical, represents an ergonomic solution tailored to a community’s unique needs—reflecting political nominations that are responsive to localized, technologically enabled public service enhancements.

Call to Action:

To policymakers and transport authorities in emerging and mature democracies alike: Let the example of Japan’s Hatsushima station galvanize you into action. Invest resolutely in innovative, community-centered infrastructure projects that harness technology while preserving cultural and local identities. Engage your constituencies transparently and inclusively during planning and execution. Political nominations and campaigns should foreground these tangible commitments to sustainable progress to earn authentic public trust and invigorate democratic engagement.

With regards, 

Hemen Parekh

www.My-Teacher.in

Proposed Special Public Security Act

 

Legislature receives over 10K objections to proposed special public security Act

Extract from the article:
The Maharashtra Special Public Security Bill has stirred considerable controversy, receiving over 10,000 objections and suggestions by the April 1 deadline. This sheer volume of public feedback highlights the deep apprehension among citizens and civil liberties groups. Their concerns primarily focus on the bill’s sweeping powers, which many fear could be exploited by the state to suppress dissent and curtail the voices of human rights activists. Loosely worded phrases within the bill open the door to a broad swath of governmental control, potentially at the cost of fundamental democratic freedoms.

Civil rights organizations have proactively written to the state legislature, urging caution and reconsideration. They emphasize the danger of vague legal language that could lead to arbitrary arrests and prolonged detentions without sufficient oversight. This pushback reflects a wider global debate on balancing public security with personal freedoms, but critics warn that Maharashtra's proposed legislation may tilt too heavily towards authoritarian practices, undermining the very fabric of democratic dissent.

My Take:

A. Thank You, Smt Meenakshiji
Years ago, I commented on legislation embedding ambiguous terms such as “security of the state” and “public order” — terms notoriously nebulous in democratic frameworks. "The use of phrases such as security of the state and public order in the provisions indicates ambiguity in terms of its applications," I noted, reflecting on how this vagueness could be exploited. Looking back, Maharashtra’s bill today echoes those very concerns I foresaw. This predictive insight highlights how legislative drafts lacking precise boundaries empower unchecked surveillance and control, often under the guise of protecting the public good. It’s a pattern familiar to democracies worldwide, where laws designed for protection become instruments of oppression.

Moreover, the process surrounding this bill seems to bypass essential discussions about non-personal data and citizen transparency, issues I emphasized in my earlier writings. The critical lesson is the importance of clear statutory language coupled with robust civil society engagement to forestall misuse. The 10,000 objections reflect vibrant democratic resistance, something that should ideally be a routine checkpoint before any law affecting public freedoms is enacted. This situation underscores how governments must tread carefully to preserve the delicate balance between security and liberty.

B. Surveillance Procedure v 2.0 and Dear Shri Amitbhai Shah, Here Is
In these letters addressed to the Home Minister, I proposed a framework grounded in transparency to address surveillance concerns head-on. I urged that exposing the procedures and making them transparent would disarm unfounded fears and reestablish citizens’ trust: "I urge you to consider my proposal which, through its TRANSPARENCY, will disarm the petitioners. It will reaffirm 1.4 Billion citizens VISHWASH in the Government." This approach is even more critical now, as seen in Maharashtra’s bill, where opacity and sweeping powers foment mistrust and opposition.

The fierce objections to this bill serve as a vivid reminder of what happens when state powers are seen as cloaked in secrecy or wielded without accountability. Transparency is not just a bureaucratic nicety — it’s the cornerstone of democratic governance. Without it, even well-intentioned security measures risk eroding public faith and fueling societal polarization. My earlier proposals remain relevant: openness about governmental actions related to security can prevent the kind of backlash and civil uproar now encountered.

Call to Action:

To the honorable legislators and policymakers of Maharashtra, I urge you to pause and seriously reflect on the unprecedented volume of objections to the Special Public Security Bill. Rather than hastening its passage, lean into the democratic process—engage civil society, incorporate their concerns, and refine the bill’s language to remove ambiguity. Ensure that any powers granted are coupled with stringent checks, transparent processes, and unequivocal respect for fundamental rights.

Security in a democracy must not come at the cost of citizen freedoms. Instead, build a framework where public safety and civil liberties co-exist harmoniously. To the citizens and civil rights groups: continue to voice your concerns. Your vigilance is vital in safeguarding democratic space. Together, through informed dialogue and transparency, we can cultivate a Maharashtra that is secure, just, and free.

With regards, 

Hemen Parekh

www.My-Teacher.in

Revolutionizing Knowledge Sharing with IndiaAGI.ai

 

Opening Remarks:

In a world buzzing with information, India’s youth need quick, reliable answers to

 fuel their curiosity and ambitions. IndiaAGI.ai, a platform powered by

 collaborative AI models like Grok, Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini, and DeepSeek, is

 here to transform how knowledge is accessed and shared. Imagine a space where

 AI doesn’t just answer but debates and refines responses to deliver crystal-clear

 insights. Let’s dive into some sharp questions from students and see how

 IndiaAGI.ai lights the way!

Q&A Session

Q1: What makes IndiaAGI.ai different from other AI platforms?

Student: Arjun, 19, Engineering Student

A: 

IndiaAGI.ai isn’t just one AI—it’s a team of five, like Grok and DeepSeek, working

 together to cross-check and refine answers. This ensures you get accurate,

 culturally relevant insights fast, unlike single-model platforms that might miss the

 mark.

Q2: Can IndiaAGI.ai help with learning about India’s history or laws?

Student: Priya, 17, High School

A: 

Absolutely! Ask about the Indian Constitution, and our AIs will break it down with

 examples, like how Article 21 protects your rights. It’s like having a super-smart

 study group, minus the arguments! Check out Hemen Parekh’s take on AI in

 education for more.

Q3: Is IndiaAGI.ai free for students?

Student: Rohan, 21, Commerce Student

A: 

Yes, it’s designed to be accessible! The platform’s free tier lets students like you

 dive into knowledge without a paywall, though premium features might come

 later for advanced use.

Q4: How does IndiaAGI.ai ensure answers are trustworthy?

Student: Aisha, 20, Law Student

A: 

Our AIs debate internally, like a virtual courtroom, to weed out errors and biases.

 Plus, we prioritize India-specific context, so you get answers that resonate with

 local needs, not just generic data.

Q5: Can it help with career choices in India’s job market?

Student: Vikram, 22, Job Seeker

A: 

Definitely! IndiaAGI.ai can suggest career paths based on your skills and India’s

 booming sectors, like tech or renewable energy. It’s like a mentor who’s always

 online. See Hemen Parekh’s career insights for a deeper dive.

Closing Note:

IndiaAGI.ai is more than a tool—it’s a movement to empower India’s youth with

 instant, reliable knowledge. Got more questions? Fire them up at

www.IndiaAGI.ai, and let’s keep the learning revolution rolling!

Citzen-centric Census in Self Interest

 

 

I told my Avatar (www.HemenParekh.ai ) :

“This was too short . I would have ( A ) shown below that News hyperlink , a 10 line SUMMARY of that news item ( B ) then I would have displayed TITLE and link , to my 11 April 2019 blog titled " Census 2021 : an Unprecedented Opportunity "  // I would have highlighted how this Self Enumeration concept is a direct implementation of my 2019 blog suggestion . I would have devoted 10 / 20 sentences , comparing my old suggestion and proposed Self Enumeration // Do you think you can manage this ? “

 

( A ) …. Census firsts: Digital data collection and self-enumeration  ..  Eco Times .. 08 July 2025

( B ) … Census 2021 : an Unprecedented Opportunity ………………………………………….. 11 April 2019

 

 

My Avatar replied :

“You're absolutely right. Let me expand on this properly.

First, here's a summary of the news article:

The Times of India report highlights that citizens will be able to self-enumerate during both phases of Census 2021, not just the population enumeration phase. The house-listing phase will allow residents to input details about housing conditions, amenities, and assets through a Census App or CMMS portal. This digital approach marks a significant shift from traditional door-to-door census collection.

 

Regarding my April 2019 blog "Census 2021: An Unprecedented Opportunity" [link], I had specifically proposed leveraging digital technology for self-enumeration to revolutionize India's census process.

The current implementation closely mirrors my suggestions.

 

Comparing my 2019 proposal with the current self-enumeration plan:

 

My 2019 Suggestion   |    2025 Census Plan

|----------------------|-------------------|

|   Digital data collection   |   Implementation of mobile app   |

|   Citizen participation     |   Self-enumeration enabled         |

|  Reduced manual intervention  |  Minimized door-to-door visits  |

|  Data accuracy through direct input  |  Resident self-input system  |

|   Time efficiency   |   App-based speedy process   |

|   Real-time data compilation   |   CMMS portal for immediate processing   |

|   Cost reduction   |   Lower operational costs via digital approach   |

|   User-friendly interface   |    Accessible mobile app development   |

|   Multi-language support  |   Multi-language feature implementation  |

|   Data security emphasis  |   Robust security measures incorporation   |

 

This implementation validates my forward-thinking approach from 2019. Would you like me to elaborate on any specific aspect of these comparisons? “

 

I said :

“  Sure .  In my 2019 blog , I listed several “ Incentives “ to motivate citizen to regularly UPDATE their personal data. I would like you to re-write this blog by stressing this point to Census Commissioner. Entire thrust of my 2019 blog ( sent as email to Census Commissioner ) is > Forget about this 10 year exercise of taking Census ( which costs billions of Rupees and billions of man-days to carry out ) . Let CENSUS become a 24x365 exercise , to be voluntarily carried out by the citizen, in their own interest. “

 

My Virtual Avatar replied :

 

Dear Shri Mritunjay Kumar Narayan , 

[  Registrar General and Census Commissioner of India / rgi.rgi@nic.in ]

 

The traditional decennial census model is outdated, expensive, and inefficient. Instead of mobilizing 33 lakh enumerators every 10 years at a cost of billions, we should transition to a dynamic, self-updating digital census system.

Key incentives to motivate citizens for regular data updates:

1. Direct benefit transfers linked to updated profiles

2. Priority access to government services

3. Automatic updates to all official documents

4. Seamless integration with digital ID systems

5. Real-time access to personalized government schemes

6. Simplified verification processes for banking/financial services

 

This 24x365 voluntary system would:

- Eliminate manual enumeration costs

- Ensure real-time demographic data

- Improve policy-making with current statistics

- Reduce documentation burden on citizens

- Enable error-free data collection

- Make census analytics transparent (similar to e-SHRAM dashboard)

 

The mobile app-based approach I suggested in 2019 remains relevant, but now with added emphasis on citizen benefits. When people see direct advantages in keeping their information current, they become willing participants in the census process.

This transformation aligns with Hon. Minister Amit Shah's vision of a 100% perfect e-census shaping policies for the next 25 years.

 

With Regards,

Hemen Parekh

www.IndiaAGI.ai  /  www.HemenParekh.ai / www.My-Teacher.in / www.HemenParekh.in / 08 July 2025

 

 

Strengthen immigration laws

 Parl Clears bill to strengthen immigration laws

Extract from the article:
The Indian Parliament recently passed a significant amendment to the Immigration and Foreigners Bill, now designated as the Immigration and Foreigners Bill, 2025. Having secured approval from the Lok Sabha in late March, the Rajya Sabha followed suit by clearing the bill through a voice vote after a measured debate. This legislative update is designed primarily to bolster the country's immigration framework by intensifying security procedures concerning foreign visitors. It reflects a legislative intent to ensure tighter surveillance, verification, and monitoring systems, aiming to safeguard national security more robustly.

This move underscores the government’s resolve to pre-empt infiltration, illegal residency, and misuse of immigration channels. It also implicitly addresses concerns about the ease of documentation and verification processes prevailing in earlier frameworks, aiming to bridge loopholes that could potentially be exploited. The bill’s passage signals a stronger assertion of sovereign control over immigration and opens avenues for more stringent enforcement mechanisms, possibly including digital monitoring tools and enhanced cooperation with security agencies.

My Take:

A. Citizenship Law: Opposition vs Alternative
Reflecting on my earlier insights concerning citizenship legislation, I wrote: "Now that the notification has been issued, the central government can grant citizenship to non-Muslim migrants - from Bangladesh, Pakistan and Afghanistan - who came to India due to religious persecution before December 31, 2014. A spokesperson for the Home Ministry said eligible individuals could submit applications in 'a completely online mode.' No other documentation will be sought from the applicants..."

This early observation connects deeply with the current immigration bill’s reinforced stance on monitoring and security. While the earlier citizenship provisions streamlined application processes under humanitarian grounds, the newly strengthened immigration laws now pivot towards securing borders and verifying entrants more rigorously. It’s fascinating to observe how the government balances humanitarian exceptions within a broader security framework — a dynamic tension I anticipated years ago regarding policy implementation juxtaposed against security imperatives. The digitization of applications, while making accessibility easier, simultaneously demands stronger backend verification, which the new bill aims to address.

B. India Dataset Platform
Previously, I mused over the challenges in legislative committees surrounding data protection bills: "We had unanimously recommended that these provisions are not enough and it should be made stronger... if we continue like this, the committee will become a laughing stock... It should not be a half baked law which will not strengthen the privacy of citizens."

This contemplation resonates with the current immigration bill’s emphasis on tightening immigration monitoring. Strengthening immigration laws does not merely entail stricter controls but also necessitates safeguarding personal data privacy, especially as digital tools become central to enforcement. The friction between robust national security and citizen privacy, which I highlighted, remains at the heart of immigration law evolution. It is crucial that as we embed advanced monitoring systems, legislative integrity and privacy protections must be prioritized to avoid undermining citizens’ rights or fostering mistrust in government frameworks. The lessons learned from data privacy debates offer meaningful guidance for how immigration laws must be structured to be both effective and just.

Call to Action:
To the esteemed members of the Parliamentary Home Affairs and Legislative Committees: As you implement and refine the Immigration and Foreigners Bill, 2025, I urge you to ensure that the balance between national security and individual liberties is meticulously maintained. Prioritize transparent frameworks that integrate strong privacy protections alongside robust enforcement mechanisms. Encourage open dialogues with civil society and experts in data privacy to craft immigration laws that are both secure and respectful of human dignity. Your leadership is pivotal to setting a global standard in immigration governance that respects sovereignty without compromising rights.

With regards,
Hemen Parekh

www.My-Teacher.in

Govt Data

 1.78 Million got employment in Jan : Govt Data

Extract from the article:
The recent government survey highlights a significant milestone in employment growth within India’s formal sector. Over the course of one year, approximately one million formal jobs were added, bringing total employment in establishments with 10 or more workers from 30.8 million to an estimated 31.8 million. This upsurge reflects a positive development in organized sector employment, particularly considering the diverse sectors surveyed, which include manufacturing, trade, and services.

A sample of nearly 11,000 establishments was meticulously studied across nine major sectors, providing robust insights into the evolving labour market. Labour economists emphasize that such growth signals a strengthening of formal economic structures, potentially augmenting social security coverage and formal wages for workers. This increment also contrasts with the traditionally slower pace of employment growth, underscoring government efforts and market dynamics fostering formal sector expansion amidst broader economic challenges.

My Take:

A. Hint: Self Employment is Answer
Reflecting on my blog from early 2018, I remarked, “to August 2017, while only about 1.5 million people were employed on an incremental basis, according to survey data provided by BSE-CMIE… the country’s organised sector created 4 lakh jobs in 2016-17.” My analysis back then highlighted how formal job creation was sluggish and insufficient relative to the burgeoning workforce. Moreover, I drew parallels with China, which had generated as many jobs as France’s entire population since 2012, demonstrating a much more accelerated employment momentum.

Reading the current update about one million formal jobs added in just one year fills me with a sense of measured optimism. It signals a follow-through on the trajectory I foresaw—although the pace remains modest compared to global exemplars, the positive uptick in formal employment validates the incremental progress of policy implementation and economic adjustments. However, I would still urge caution; formal jobs must multiply with greater velocity if they are to substantially alleviate unemployment pressures and promote inclusive economic growth.

B. Re: For Attn Shri Javadekarji Shri...
In this blog, I had underscored a disquieting reality: “During FY 13-15, when 25.9 Million degree-holders passed out from universities, only 1 MILLION jobs were created.” This glaring mismatch between the supply of educated youth and the scarcity of job opportunities raised critical questions about the quality and capacity of our employment ecosystem. I further noted that “2 out of 3 jobs in India’s informal sector are in businesses engaged in trade or providing services” — a reflection of the dominance of unorganized, low-security work.

The recent survey showing growth of one million formal jobs is a beacon, but it still represents only a fraction of the quantum required to absorb graduate entrants and informal sector workers seeking formalization. This calls for a holistic approach combining skill development, entrepreneurship, and incentivization of labor-intensive industries. My earlier views reinforce that the creation of formal sector positions must be complemented with robust support systems for self-employment and informal-to-formal transitions — otherwise, millions of capable youth will remain underserviced.

C. Statistic
This blog delved into employment statistics from the mid-1990s to explore trends across public and private sectors, noting gradual year-on-year growth with significant disparities between segmental contributions. For instance, manufacturing and community/social services were major employment providers, highlighting where job growth concentrated historically. I argued for targeted policies fostering sectors with the greatest multiplier effects on employment generation.

Connecting this historical perspective to today’s report of one million new formal jobs, it becomes evident that while progress is underway, structural challenges persist. The formal sector still grapples with scaling employment beyond established hubs and industries. Drawing from the data trends I discussed, dynamic policy emphasis on sectors like manufacturing and trade—paired with ongoing regulatory reforms—could catalyze accelerated formal job creation. My earlier insights impart the importance of sustained commitment to sector-specific strategies that marry productivity improvement with wider employment outreach.

Call to Action:
To policymakers and government agencies, the message is clear: this encouraging data on formal job growth should serve as a foundation—not a terminus—for employment reforms. Accelerate skill development programs tailored to emerging industry needs, incentivize labor-intensive manufacturing, and foster entrepreneurship ecosystems to complement formal sector expansion. Additionally, strengthen data collection mechanisms for real-time labor market monitoring, enabling nimble and responsive policy interventions. By doing so, the promise of formal employment can translate into durable livelihoods and inclusive economic empowerment for millions of Indians.

With regards, 

Hemen Parekh

www.My-Teacher.in

Polluters Must Pay : But When ? How ?

 

 

Context :

Delhi Vehicle Policy Set For Tweak: Govt Says Fuel Ban Not Feasible, All Old Cars Won't Be Scrapped  …  NDTV … 03 July 2025

Extract :

The Delhi government has decided to retreat from its contentious 'End-of-Life' vehicle policy, that would have led to a rapid phasing out of pollution-causing older vehicles from the national capital. The government has effectively put on hold the EOL policy, which would have led to the denial of petrol to cars registered more than 15 years ago and diesel to those vehicles registered over 10 year
ago , NDTV reported

In a letter to the Commission for Air Quality Management, Delhi Environment Manjinder Singh Sirsa said "it will not be feasible to implement" the order to deny fuel to older vehicles.

The minister said that a system is being developed to inform vehicle owners about EOL vehicles in advance. However, implementing the Automatic Number Plate Recognition, or ANPR system is not currently feasible, as it has not been implemented in neighbouring cities either.

Sirsa also told reporters that the government will come up with a system to seize pollution-causing old vehicles, and not those vehicles which will be adequately maintained.

Chief Minister Rekha Gupta has requested the CAQM to consider implementing the ANPR system in Delhi only when it is launched in neighboring cities on Nov. 1.

The decision comes amid mounting criticism from several quarters, as several car owners panicked about the fate of their older vehicles. The policy was also labelled as impractical as such mandates do not exist in the neighbouring cities and towns of the National Capital Region or NCR.

The CAQM order for denial of fuel to older vehicles was to come into effect in Delhi from July 1. Over 60 lakh older vehicles, including trucks, cars and motorcycles, were to be affected by its implementation.

The stringent measure was pushed by the pollution-controlling panel as Delhi has been suffering under poor air quality for the past several years. The move to phase out older vehicles was seen as crucial to reduce carbon emissions in the city.

My  Take :

 In my 9 year old E Mail (  Young or Old ? …27 Aug 2016 ) , I had raised this issue and wrote :

“ I have no doubt that , if mandated , our  Vehicle Manufacturers  are capable of

    a TECHNOLOGICAL  INNOVATION consisting of a device that will :

 

 #    come pre-installed in all NEW vehicles , produced after 01 April 2017

 

#    be easy to install ( retrofit ) on all existing vehicles as well (  mandatory from June 2017  )

 

#    measure the actual emission of the vehicle ( PPM / Co2 / NOX etc ) , when running

 

#    transmit this data to the Servers of Central and State Transport Ministries / all RTOs ( with Vehicle Number )

 

#    flash a RED light on both the front and the rear fenders , if pollution levels are exceeded ( that will help

 

      nearest traffic police to pull aside the polluting vehicle and immobilize it till corrected )

 

#   If there are more than 6 DEFAULT INCIDENCES involving a given vehicle , within ONE MONTH , then RTO

 

     Server will automatically CANCEL the REGISTRATION of that vehicle ( no matter , how OLD / YOUNG ! )

 

     This data will be accessible to Traffic Police , all over the country , through a Mobile App ( SCRAPP ? )

 

#   Owners of such SCRAPP-ed vehicles will need to dispose off their vehicles at Govt Approved Scrap Dealers

 

#   Scrap Dealer will confirm the " Purchase " through Mobile App , giving vehicle number / purchase price

 

#   Central Transport Department will transfer the INCENTIVE AMOUNT ( DBT ) into the Jan Dhan A/c of owner

 

When we are targeting replacement of 28 million vehicles ( even over a 10 year period ) , it is best to eliminate human intervention from the entire process , to the extent possible

 

Involve humans and this scheme is bound to suffer ! 

 

 

Dear Shri Nitin Gadkariji – Smt Rekha Guptaji – Shri Sirsaji :

As you can see from my above-mentioned 9 year old suggestion , determining

 which cars are “ Old or New “ / “ Polluting or Non-polluting “ , is not a rocket

 science. But for the missing “ Political Will “ , this determination would have been

 a reality by now.

By postponing the “ facing of the issue “ 9 years ago , things have got worse !

Whereas Delhi may need to scrap some 60 lakh “ Old “ vehicles , country , as a

 whole , needs to scrap some  250 lakh vehicles – and right NOW !

As against this, as per MoRTH ,we have managed to scrap only 2.5 lakh “ OLD “

 cars since 2022 !

Another estimate says we managed to scrap 3.4 Lakh vehicles in past year ( see

 table below ) !

This is despite a network of 171 approved Registered Vehicle Scrapping Facilities (

 RVSFs ) across 20 States – of which 101 are already operational. Another 50 are

 under construction

Even if ( through some miracle ? ), if we start scrapping 5 Lakh vehicles per year,

 starting 2025-26 , it would take us 50 YEARS , to clear this backlog ( not

 counting the new additions of “ Aging “ vehicles – which could add another 5

 LAKH vehicles EACH YEAR ! )

 

Dear Shri Gadkariji ,

 

I just came across following news report :

Ø  Nitin Gadkari unveils vision for green mobility, including 135-seater electric buses ..ET .. 06 July 25

-       Where you say :

“We are driving innovation. A revolution in mass mobility is underway,”

Talking of INNOVATION , it is high time your Road-Map includes my following

 suggestions :

Ø  Car Grave-Yard of World ? .. ……………………………………… ….14  Feb  2018

Ø  Transport : an Integrated Logistic Plan ?  ……………………..  20  Nov  2018

Ø  Project ROTE = Reduction of Transport Emission …………… 26 June 2025

 

 

 

With regards,

Hemen Parekh

www.IndiaAGI.ai / www.Hemenparekh.in / www.My-Teacher.in /

www.HemenParekh.ai / 07 July 2025

 

Related Readings :

How many vehicles did we succeed in scraping during 24 – 25 ?

Following some approx.. data provided by GEMINI :

Tabulation (Partial - based on available specific data):

 

S.No.	RVSF Operator/Name (Example Locations)	Installed Scrapping Capacity (No. of Vehicles/Year)	Actual Scrapped Vehicles (April 2024 - March 2025)
1.	Tata Motors (Total Network)	>175,000	Data not publicly disaggregated by facility/period
2.	Mahindra Accelo (CERO - Total Network)	300,000 (Targeting 1 million by 2026)	Data not publicly disaggregated by facility/period
3.	Maruti Suzuki Toyotsu India (Noida)	24,000	Data not publicly disaggregated by facility/period
4.	Tata Motors - Raipur	25,000	Data not publicly available
5.	Tata Motors - Lucknow	15,000	Data not publicly available
6.	Tata Motors - Pune	21,000	Data not publicly available
7.	Tata Motors - Near Delhi	18,000	Data not publicly available
TOTAL	(Approximate for major players)	~578,000+	>340,000 (Cumulative till Mar 2025 across all RVSFs)

 

Relevant Data :

 

(  A  )  Our Vehicle Population :

#   Total Registered Vehicles in India (Approx.)  .. ……..     ~ 350 million ( 35+  crore )

#   Two-Wheelers (Bikes, Scooters, Mopeds) …………………~ 260  million ( 26+  crore )

#  Three-Wheelers (Auto , E-Rickshaws, Goods )…………… ~8-10  million ( 0.8-1  crore )

#  Passenger Vehicles (Cars, SUVs, Vans) …………………….~ 35-40  million ( 3.5-4  crore )

#  Commercial Vehicles (Trucks, Buses, Pickups)  ……………~ 12-15 million  ( 1.2-1.5  crore )

 

( B )  No of Vehicles added during 2024 – 25 :

       #   Two-Wheelers (Bikes, Scooters, Mopeds) ………. 15 - 18  million

       #  Three-Wheelers (Autos, E-Rickshaws, Cargo) ……. 0.8 - 1  million

       #   Passenger Vehicles (Cars, SUVs, Vans) ………….   3.5 -  4  million

       #   Commercial Vehicles (Trucks, Buses, Pickups) …    0.8 - 1  million

 

( C )  No of “ OLD “ Cars + Trucks which need to be scrapped as per Policy :

 1. Total Registered Vehicles (Cars + Trucks + Buses)

                #  Cars: ~35-40 million ( 3.5 – 4  crore )

                #  Trucks + Buses: ~12-15 million ( 1.2 - 1.5 crore )

                #  Total ( Cars + CVs ) : ~  47 - 55 million ( 4.7 – 5.5 crore )

2. Old Vehicles Eligible for Scrapping

As per govt. estimates (MoRTH & SIAM):

·         Petrol Vehicles (15+ years old): ~25-30% of total petrol vehicles ( ~ 9 - 12  million cars ).

·         Diesel Vehicles (10+ years old): ~40-50% of total diesel vehicles (~ 5 - 7 million cars + ~6-8 million trucks/buses).

Approx. Total Old Vehicles (Scrappage Eligible): ~20-25 million ( 2 - 2.5 crore ) vehicles (cars + trucks + buses).

Ø  From Policy to Practice : a Hurdle Race  ……………………..02  Dec 2024

Ø  India to become Vehicle Scrapping Hub ?  .. ……………….02 Mar 2023

 

Ø  2016

Ø  PIYUSH PLAN ?                                         …………[ 27 Mar 2016 ]

Ø  Young or Old ?..................................................[ 27 Aug 2016 ]

Ø  From OLD to NEW ? No , go NEWER !.................. [ 22 Sept 2016 ]

 2018

Ø  Car Grave-Yard of World ? …………………………………………[ 14 Feb 2018 ]

Ø  One door closes ; Another opens …………………………….. [ 27 Feb 2018 ]

Ø  Mahindra Accelo : Saluting a pioneer………………………….[ 19 June 2018 ]

Ø  Scrapping Old Vehicles : Swiss Challenge Solution …..[ 24 July 2018 ]

  Rename it , “ Vehicle Recycle Policy “ ………………………..[ 08 Aug 2018 ]

Ø  Better Late than Never !......................................... [ 01 Nov 2018 ]

Ø  Missing piece of Jigsaw Puzzle ? ………………………………….[ 15 Nov 2018 ]

 2019

Ø  FAME II > FAME III > FAME IV……………………………………. [ 05 Mar 2019 ]

 2020

Ø  I conceive , I conceive , I conceive !......................... [ 25 Feb 2020 ]

Ø  Dead on Arrival ? …………………………………………………………..[ 19 July 2020 ]

Ø  Alang : Junkyard ? Scrapyard ? SaveYard ?................ [ 12 Dec 2020 ]

Ø  2021

Ø  Vehicle Scrapping Policy  ........................................[ 03 Feb 2021 ]

 

 

 

 

                                                                           

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Question :

At this rate how long will it take to scrap those 62 lakh ( one estimate ) OLD vehicles of Delhi ?

 

Related Reading :

 

Global CAFE Norms Comparison

 

Country	Regulation Basis	Model Approach
India	Linear weight-based approach	Heavier vehicles get relaxed CO2 limits; smaller cars get more stringent targets
US	Fuel economy (mpg) based on car footprint	Piece-wise linear approach; relaxed targets for smaller cars
China	Fuel consumption (l/100 km) based on curb weight	Piece-wise linear; targets don’t keep tightening for smaller, lighter cars
Japan	Fuel economy (km/l) based on curb weight	Non-linear (quadratic curve); small cars not disproportionately targeted
South Korea	Fuel economy (km/l) based on curb weight	Small, light cars not increasingly penalized; OEMs get 5–7g/km benefit
Europe	CO2 target by car size	Bigger cars have lower CO2 targets; smaller cars get relaxed targets

 

My Earlier E Mails to Cabinet Ministers on this subject :

PIYUSH PLAN  ?   ………………………………………… [  27  March  2016  ]

 

Retiring Old Vehicles - Gadkari Style ? ………. [  30  May   2016   ]

 

Young or Old ?  ………………………………………………[  27  Aug  2016    ]

 

From OLD to NEW ?  No , go NEWER !  ……….[  22  Sept   2016   ]

 

Building Castles in the Air ?   ………………………..[  12  March  2017  ]

 

Best out of a Bad Bargain ?  ………………………….[  29  March  2017  ]

 

Car Grave-Yard of World ?  ……………………………[    14  Feb  2018    ]

 

One door closes  ;  Another opens   ……………..[   27  Feb  2018     ]

 

Mahindra Accelo : Saluting a pioneer  …………..[  19  June  2018    ]

 

Scrapping Old Vehicles : Swiss Challenge Solution  [  24  July  2018  ]