Context :
( Business Line )
/ 29 Nov 2023
Extract :
Addressing a rally in Kolkata to launch the BJP’s Lok Sabha
campaign, Shah alleged that West Bengal Chief Minister and Trinamool Congress
supremo Mamata Banerjee is opposing CAA as her government has been unable to
stop infiltration in the State.
“In the State in which so much infiltration
occurs, will development take place there? That’s why Mamata Banerjee is
opposing CAA. But I would
say that CAA is the law of the country, and no one can stop it. We will
implement it,” said Shah.
Dear Amitbhai Shah,
Keeping in mind , our PM Shri Modiji’s keen desire to “ Take along everyone on the path of Progress “ , I urge
you to find a COMPROMISE SOLUTION to
this problem of MIGRATION into India , of persecuted people from our
neighbouring countries , by implementing my suggestions , sent to you through
my following emails :
CAA
Compromise : With Malice towards None ………………….. 22 Jan 2020
An
Alternative to CAA ? ……………………………………………………
….22 Feb 2020
With regards,
Hemen Parekh
www.hemenparekh.ai / 30
Nov 2023
Related Readings :
Confused
about CENSUS - NPR - NRC ? …..
24 Dec 2019
Here is what ChatGPT had to say about my suggestion :
Your proposed amendment to the
Citizenship (Amendment) Act (CAA) introduces significant changes, pivoting the focus from a specific
religious group and countries to a broader inclusion of persecuted individuals
from any religious minority around the world.
Let's break down the feasibility and
implications of your proposed changes:
Feasibility:
1. Expanding Eligibility Criteria: Your proposal suggests broadening the scope of eligibility beyond specific countries and
religions to encompass persecuted individuals from any religious minority
globally. This expansion could raise logistical challenges in terms of
verification and assessment of claims of persecution.
2. Subjectivity in Proof of Persecution: Requiring individuals to prove
persecution by the majority religious community in their native country might
pose challenges in verification. Determining the authenticity of
such claims could be complex and subjective.
3. Amended Citizenship Criteria: Changing the conditions for
citizenship from the date of entry to a ten-year residency requirement (with
potential discretionary powers for earlier citizenship) alters the timeline
significantly. This may affect the
integration of these individuals into Indian society.
4. Provisions for Failed Applicants: Offering repatriation costs and
allowing continued stay as "Atithi of India" but without property
ownership creates a nuanced
approach to failed applicants.
However, ensuring compliance and managing such cases might pose administrative
challenges.
5. Treatment of Children Born to
Foreigners: Granting Indian
citizenship to children
born in India to foreigners failing to attain "Certificate of
Naturalization" is a progressive
provision, ensuring the rights of such children.
Implications:
1. Inclusivity: Your proposal aims at a more inclusive approach,
addressing the concerns of persecuted minorities globally, not just limited to
specific countries and religions.
2. Administrative Challenges: Implementing such a comprehensive
amendment requires robust
administrative systems for verification, evaluation, and
decision-making. Ensuring fair and just assessments would be crucial.
3. Integration and Assimilation: Shifting the criteria for
citizenship might impact the integration of individuals into Indian society.
Balancing this while safeguarding national interests is essential.
4. Legal and Constitutional Alignment: The proposed changes should align
with constitutional principles and existing legal frameworks to prevent any
potential conflict or violation of rights.
5. Political Acceptance: The acceptance and implementation of
such a broadened and nuanced amendment would require political consensus and support across various
stakeholders.
Conclusion:
Your proposed amendment represents a broad, inclusive,
and compassionate approach towards addressing the concerns of persecuted
minorities worldwide.
However, it poses various logistical,
administrative, and evaluative challenges.
Moreover, it requires thorough
deliberation, political consensus, and an assessment of its practical
implications before implementation.
Overall, it's a comprehensive proposal that
attempts to strike a balance between humanitarian concerns and national
interests.
====================
No comments:
Post a Comment