The Enduring Challenge of Inclusive Cities: A Reflection on Housing and Humanity

The recent discussions around new policies focusing on affordable housing and inclusivity, as highlighted by reports from sources like ResearchGate and even initiatives in cities like New York, resonate deeply with long-standing concerns I've voiced about urban development. It's heartening to see these critical issues gain prominence, yet it also brings a familiar sense of reflection on how far we've truly come.

The ResearchGate chapter, "Human Settlement Policies and Women’s Access to the City: Implications for Inclusive Cities," eloquently points out how, in post-apartheid South Africa, housing policies have been instrumental in facilitating women's access to urban areas. This concept of extending housing assets to those who would otherwise be excluded by market forces is a powerful one. However, the chapter also acknowledges that macroeconomic policies, urban design, transportation, and safety still constrain full participation, leading to housing precarity and exclusion for many, especially women. Similarly, other research cited speaks to the policy-practice disjuncture in informal settlements and the gendered implications of housing location choices. This is where the complexities truly unfold.

The Echo of Past Challenges in Urban Planning

I find myself revisiting my blog post from 2016, "Poor Planning for Urban Poor?". In it, I discussed the alarming situation where over two lakh homes built for the urban poor were lying vacant. The reasons then were strikingly similar to the constraints mentioned in today's discourse: reluctance of beneficiaries to shift due to incomplete basic infrastructure, lack of livelihood sources nearby, and unaffordable installment payments. I had argued that people would move if houses were well-built, permanent, free (or truly affordable), and, crucially, offered job opportunities nearby. My observation that "OLD cities cannot 'Re-new' themselves, until well-planned NEW cities are built first and ready to receive those old city slum-dwellers and offer them jobs" seems more pertinent now than ever. The idea that housing cannot be divorced from employment and accessibility is a fundamental truth we often overlook.

Beyond Just Buildings: The Human Element

The notion of inclusivity isn't just about constructing buildings; it's about fostering genuine access and empowerment. My previous thoughts on women's empowerment, such as those related to the "Odisha Subhadra Scheme", emphasize that financial assistance and intentional schemes are vital steps. However, true empowerment in the urban context requires safe, accessible, and affordable living environments that support livelihoods and well-being. The ResearchGate articles underscore how women's homeownership can have an "asset effect" but that policy implementation often falls short, particularly for migrant women or those in informal settlements. This gap between policy and practice is precisely what I had predicted as a recurring challenge.

The Imperative for Integrated Solutions and Authentic Engagement

When we talk about identifying poverty and vulnerability, as the government aims to do with door-to-door surveys, I recall my observations in "Govt's door-to-door survey to identify poverty vulnerability among urban workers". I questioned the efficacy of traditional, massive survey operations, suggesting we "Suspending Surveys: How about Scrapping?" in favor of more advanced data collection. More importantly, I championed "Involving People: A Path to Empowerment", advocating for community engagement to identify and prioritize needs directly. This approach not only streamlines the process but also adds authenticity to the data, ensuring that policies for affordable housing and inclusivity genuinely reflect the lives of those they aim to serve.

The current focus on affordable housing and inclusivity is a step in the right direction, but as I've observed time and again, the devil is in the details of execution. The insights from years past – about the critical link between housing location and livelihoods, the need for genuine affordability, the importance of community involvement, and the complex interplay of various urban policies – remain incredibly relevant. It is a striking validation of those earlier thoughts, but also a renewed urgency to truly learn from past experiences and implement policies that are not just well-intentioned but also well-integrated and deeply human-centered.

---

Regards,
Hemen Parekh