Wednesday, 31 December 2025

Migrant Return Hubs ( MRB ) = Detention Camps

==================================================

Migrant Return Hubs ( MRB ) = Detention Camps

SITUATION IN EUROPE :

A …. MUAMMAR GADDAFI - A VISIONARY ? ………………… 04 Aug 2015

Extract :

Guardian reported on 01 Sept 2010 , as follows :

"In a highly theatrical visit to Italy this week, Gaddafi warned that Europe would turn "black" unless it was more rigorous in turning back immigrants. Libya is a key transit point for illegal migration from Africa to Europe. The Libyan leader said the bill for sealing the crossing routes would be at least € 5bn a year.

While in Rome Gaddafi advised Europeans to convert to Islam and sought to bolster his claim for billions from Europe by warning that millions of Africans were seeking to migrate to the EU.

"We don't know what will be the reaction of the white and Christian Europeans faced with this influx of starving and ignorant Africans," the Libyan leader told a Rome meeting attended by Silvio Berlusconi, the Italian prime minister. "We don't know if Europe will remain an advanced and united continent or if it will be destroyed, as happened with the barbarian invasions."

B …. Gaddafi returns to haunt EU …………………………………… 18 Dec 2023

C …. On its Way : Refugee-Migrant Tsunami ………………….. 19 Sept 2016

D …. FREEDOM BEHIND BARS ?.................................... 16 Sept 2015

Extract :

INVASION OF EUROPE ,

by hundreds of migrants trying to cross the Serbia - Hungary border

Of course , closed gates / 4 meter high barbed wire fence / water cannons and tear gas shells , held back those few hundred refugees

But , for how long , when those few hundred become few thousands ?

Hungary's response :

Passed a law treating illegal migration as a criminal offence

I presume , Hungary will prosecute those thousands of Syrian / Libyan / Iraqi refugees and imprison them on its own soil

A step that would be welcomed by those refugees , even though they have no intention to seek asylum in Hungary !

Getting imprisoned in Hungary will ensure that

> they have a roof on their heads

> they will not die of cold in coming harsh European winter

> their children / infants will not starve

> they will not get killed by wars ravaging their own countries

I expect them to sing :

" Stone walls do not a prison make , nor iron bars a cage "

I hope rest of Europe realizes that no fence can stop millions of migrants marching from its eastern borders and over the Mediterranean sea

They are trying to escape from war / hunger, to peace / food !

But then, this problem will not remain an European Problem alone, for long !

It is bound to get replicated all over the World !

World over, poor people will try to migrate to " Islands of Prosperity " - whether just across the borders or across oceans

FAST FORWARD 10 YEARS :

EU countries talk on immigration, set to back ‘return hubs …….. 09 Dec 2025

Extract :

EU countries yesterday were expected to approve a significant tightening of Europe’s immigration policy, including endorsing the concept of setting up “return hubs” for migrants outside the 27-nation bloc.

Fearful of far-right parties making gains at the ballot box, governments across Europe are scrambling to take a tougher stance. Interior ministers meeting in Brussels were to vote for the first time on a series of measures presented this year by the bloc’s executive to more strictly regulate the arrival and return of migrants.

If adopted, these measures would notably allow the opening of centers outside the EU’s borders, to which migrants whose asylum applications have been rejected would be sent, or the so-called “return hubs”; harsher penalties for migrants who refuse to leave European territory, including through longer periods of detention; and returning migrants to countries that are not their country of origin, but which Europe considers “safe.”

A decline in irregular entries to Europe — down by about 20 percent so far this year compared with last year — has not eased the pressure to act on the politically explosive issue.

The latest proposals come just a few months after the EU adopted a mammoth new migration law that is to come into effect in June next year.

“We have to speed up to give the people the feeling that we have control over what is happening,” European Commissioner for Internal Affairs and Migration Magnus Brunner said.

The new initiatives have caused consternation among activists working with migrants.

“Instead of investing in safety, protection, and inclusion, the EU is choosing policies that will push more people into danger and legal limbo,” Platform for International Cooperation on Undocumented Migrants advocacy officer Silvia Carta said.

Under the impetus of Denmark, which holds the EU’s rotating presidency and has long advocated for these measures, member states are moving forward at a rapid pace.

However, some in the bloc remain sceptical.

France is questioning the legality and effectiveness of some of the proposals, while Spain is not convinced that “return hubs” work after several unsuccessful trials by other countries.

They likely also discussed the distribution of at least 30,000 asylum seekers under the recent legal changes.

That move is part of a new “solidarity” system to help relieve pressure on countries that see large numbers of arrivals, such as Greece and Italy.

Other EU countries are expected to accept asylum seekers or to contribute 20,000 euros (US$23,304) per person to the countries under pressure.

However, with governments across the bloc being urged to tighten immigration policies, putting a hand up to take in extra asylum seekers is fraught with political risk.

The EU is nevertheless under pressure to hammer out a compromise on resettlement, with the clock ticking to come up with a final decision by the end of the year.

SITUATION IN INDIA :

> For past several months , Election Commission is conducting SIR { Special Intensive Revision ) in several States. As a result , it has removed from Voters Lists , millions of voter-names for following reasons :

( A ) Person not found at given address

( B ) Person not able to produce documents to prove that he is an Indian Citizen , living in that State

EC will not allow such persons to vote { Only genuine Citizen of India , can vote }

EC has ( may be indirect ) obligation that Non – Citizens ( Foreigners who have illegally entered India – may be decades ago – and settled down , by acquiring Ration Cards / Aadhar Cards / even Voter Cards etc ) are NOT allowed to vote

Beyond that , our Central Government has obligation to return these illegal migrants to their original countries

In this connection , read :

> Detect, delete, deport’: Shah defends SIR in LS …………….. 11 Dec 2025

Home Minister Amit Shah insists on detecting and deporting undocumented migrants from voter lists

> UP to set up detention centres after compiling detailed list of illegal immigrants .. 03 Dec 2025

On November 22, Adityanath had issued clear instructions to all district magistrates of the state to take prompt and strict action against illegal immigrants and had directed that temporary detention centres be established in each district to house infiltrators

Detention Centre In UP

ECI issues 4-point action agenda to states holding SIR .. 30 Dec 2025

So , in Europe , there will be hundreds of “ Migrant Return Hubs “

I cannot escape a feeling that these will cost ( Construct + Operate ) many more times than Euro 5 BILLION which Gaddafi had asked Europe, some 10 years ago !

How much would it cost India to construct + operate , its own DETENTION CENTRES ?

In a recent TV broadcast , a journalist showed a brand new, 3 story building constructed in UP , for detaining 30 men + 20 women ( identified as illegal migrants )

It must have cost , nothing less than Rs 5 crores

If UP wants to lodge 1 CRORE illegal migrants in detention centres, it would need to build 2 LAKH buildings , costing Rs. 10 LakhxCrores ! That is initial capital cost. What about recurring OPERATIONAL cost ?

Let us assume that it would cost approx.. Rs 2 lakh per year to detain 1 person ( Food / medicines / building maintenance / electricity / security etc )

So , that will cost Rs 2 LAKHxCRORE per year ( for 1 crore persons )

Now ask yourself :

For how long will we need to “ Support / Feed “ these 1 CRORE illegal migrants ?

My guess > INDEFINITELY – FOREVER !

99 % of these migrants have come from Bangla Desh

Do you believe Bangla Desh Government would EVER agree to take them back ?

I cannot escape wondering what those migrants are thinking :

> “ Hey , Yogiji , how soon can we move out of our ZUGGIES into those palatial mansions ? “

With regards,

Hemen Parekh

www.HemenParekh.ai / www.IndiaAGI.ai / www.My-Teacher.in / 01 Jan 2026

Tuesday, 30 December 2025

When Pixels Become Weapons

I woke up to the familiar churn of headlines from Ahmedabad: a civil court had ordered the Indian National Congress and several of its senior leaders to remove a short video from social media that courts described as a "deepfake" and potentially defamatory. The video — posted on the party's X handle on December 17 — purported to show a conversation between the Prime Minister and a major industrialist; the lawsuit, filed by Adani Enterprises Limited, argued the clip was fabricated, defamatory and likely to cause lasting reputational harm. The court granted an ad-interim injunction and set a return date; it also directed platforms to act if the defendants failed to take it down within the timeframe given source and source.

Why this matters to me — and should matter to every digitally literate citizen — is that the case sits at the intersection of three, sometimes conflicting, public goods: truth in public discourse, freedom of political speech, and the protection of individual and corporate reputation. The court's interim order relied on established defamation principles and constitutional protections for reputation under Article 21; it also invoked judicial practice that grants injunctions in exceptional, prima facie cases where content is "manifestly defamatory" and likely to cause irreparable injury [see reporting above]. Indian courts have been using traditional defamation, privacy and personality-rights doctrines to address synthetic-media harms; judges increasingly recognise that apparently authentic audio-visual evidence can be manufactured and weaponised against people and institutions (analysis of the legal landscape).

Legal basis in brief

Defamation and reputation: Plaintiffs can seek interim injunctions and takedowns where the content appears false and damaging to reputation; courts weigh irreparable harm against free speech.
Intermediary rules: The Information Technology (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Rules, 2021 allow platform takedowns on notice and set out due-diligence obligations for intermediaries.
Evidence and procedure: Courts are adapting existing civil procedural tools (e.g., ex parte ad‑interim injunctions) and criminal/IPC provisions where identity-theft or obscene content is involved.

The campaign and civic context

This episode unfolded in Ahmedabad during a charged political season. Deepfakes are especially dangerous in electoral contexts because they combine visual persuasiveness with viral distribution; a single clip can reach millions before fact-checkers or courts can respond. That velocity changes the cost–benefit calculus for political campaigning, pushing parties to moderate the materials they share — but also tempting some actors to exploit synthetic media for short-term advantage. News outlets and platforms play a central gatekeeping role: their moderation policies, speed of action, and investment in verification tools can determine whether a lie is a localized whisper or a national crisis.

A quick technology primer

Deepfakes are synthetic audio or video generated by machine learning models — often Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) or large generative models — that can map one person's face and voice onto another's. At high quality, they can erase visible cues that once made manipulation obvious. That said, they are not perfect: artifacts, subtle timing mismatches, and metadata traces often remain.

Risks and precedents

Reputation and defamation: Fabricated statements can destroy credibility and market value, especially for corporate entities and public figures.
Electoral disruption: Deepfakes can impersonate leaders, falsely announce policies, or incite unrest.
Fraud and impersonation: Voice cloning has already enabled financial scams.

India has seen an uptick in judicial responses — interim takedowns and personality-rights orders — while legislative and regulatory frameworks remain patchwork. Globally, jurisdictions are experimenting with different approaches: the EU pairs platform duties under the Digital Services & AI Acts with provenance rules; some U.S. states impose time-limited bans on election deepfakes; other democracies are considering mandatory labelling or criminal sanctions for malicious synthetic media. For an overview of how courts and regulators are responding in India and abroad, see recent legal analyses and briefs (legal review).

What stakeholders have said

The court emphasised that reputation, once tarnished by viral digital content, may not be repairable by money alone — which is why temporary injunctions are sometimes justified. Adani Enterprises’ pleaded case described the video as false and defamatory; media reports summarise the court’s reasoning in granting interim relief source.

I also want to acknowledge the human actors named in reporting: one of the defendants identified in the news reports is Supriya Shrinate (supriya.shrinate@inc.in), who was among the leaders asked to remove the post. If you want to follow developments or reach out, that contact is publicly listed in my checks.

Practical tips: how to spot a deepfake (and what to do)

Pause and examine: Watch frame-by-frame. Look for inconsistent blinking, odd lip-sync, unnatural head movements, or flickering near hairlines and earrings.
Listen closely: Artificially generated speech can have unnatural cadence, reverb or abrupt cutoffs.
Check provenance: Where did it first appear? Official party channels, verified accounts, mainstream outlets? Reverse-search key frames and audio.
Metadata and source tools: Use tools like InVID, FotoForensics, or platform-native indicators (when available) to examine timestamps and compression fingerprints.
Cross-check: Look for corroboration from reputable fact-checkers, independent newsrooms, or the original speaker's verified channels.
Preserve evidence: If you are a target or a journalist, preserve URLs, screenshots, and copies; for legal claims, forensic analysis of originals matters.
Don’t amplify: If you suspect content is synthetic, avoid sharing until verified; virality is the killer-app for misinformation.

What this ruling implies

Courts stepping in to order takedowns underscore that existing civil remedies remain powerful tools against synthetic-media harms. However, takedowns are stopgaps: a comprehensive public response needs faster platform detection, clearer laws on malicious deepfakes, better cross-border cooperation, and sustained media literacy campaigns. The law will continue to balance two imperfect goods — protecting reputation and preventing censorship — while technology and platform governance race to keep up.

As a citizen and as someone thinking about how we stay truthful in public life, I believe the priority has to be twofold: empower platforms and institutions to act quickly against demonstrable harm, and equally empower people with the tools and scepticism to question what they see. Courts will decide many disputes, but a healthy democracy depends on a digitally literate public making good judgement calls before a single clip becomes a crisis.

Interested in having your LinkedIn profile featured here?

Submit a request.

Executives You May Want to Follow or Connect

Rajesh Chandiramani

Chief Executive Officer

Chief Executive Officer - Comviva (A Tech Mahindra Company) · Over the past decade, I have had the opportunity to navigate IT & Telecom players across India ...

Loading views...

crajesh@comviva.com

Anirudh Kala

CEO

Currently working as the Director of Celebal Technologies , A data science boutique firm dedicated to Large Scale Analytics. Helping organizations realize ...

Loading views...

anirudh@celebaltech.com

Alok Sud

Vice President

Vice President - Marketing Services, Reliance Industries Limited (Petroleum Retail) · I have been involved in setting up a world-class Retail Outlet network ...

Loading views...

Prashant SUkhwani

Marketing 40 under 40 | Vice President ...

... Retail industry. He is skilled in Brand & Marketing Management, Business Strategy, Digital Marketing, Brand Launches, Market Research and Innovations ...

Loading views...

psukhwani@burgerking.in

Dr. Shilpi Gupta

Deputy General Manager

Deputy General Manager - Technical at Biotechnology Industry Research Assistance Council (BIRAC) · Experience: Biotechnology Industry Research Assistance ...

Loading views...

sgupta.birac@nic.in

Regulating Coaching Classes

Lede

I read the reports that Maharashtra’s government is preparing to introduce a bill to regulate private coaching institutes, and that the state minister indicated it could be tabled in the monsoon session (as reported by major outlets) (LiveLaw; Hindustan Times). This is not just an administrative tweak — it aims to touch a parallel education ecosystem that millions of families interact with every year.

Why this matters: the coaching landscape in Maharashtra

The private coaching sector in India has grown into a substantial market (estimates vary; some industry studies put the national market at tens of thousands of crores of rupees annually — e.g., ~Rs. 50–60k crore as an estimate). Many of the nation’s coaching hubs and large chains operate in Maharashtra’s cities and towns (estimate).
For parents and students the sector plays two roles: supplementing classroom learning and competing to prepare students for scarce professional seats. For governments, it raises questions: safety in hostels and centres, misleading advertising, conflicts where public-school teachers also run private classes, and the commercialisation of childhood.

What the proposed bill is likely to contain

Reports from government briefings and draft discussions suggest the state is aiming for a balanced, operational law rather than a punitive one. Reasonable provisions likely to appear in a final bill include:

Mandatory registration and periodic renewal for all coaching units (with a streamlined online portal for applications).
Minimum infrastructure and safety norms: defined space per student (the Centre suggested 1 sq. metre as a baseline but the state may adjust urban norms), fire and evacuation compliance, separate toilets, and basic sanitation and ventilation checks (Hindustan Times).
Transparency obligations rather than blanket fee caps: prospectuses with clear fee breakup, refund rules, and an annual statement of accounts (some drafts preserve market pricing while enforcing mandatory disclosure).
Teacher qualifications and conflict-of-interest rules: limits on teachers employed by government/aided schools simultaneously running classes that compromise their school duties; background and qualification checks for tutors engaged with children.
Advertising norms and truth-in-claims: penalties for misleading ads that promise ranks or guaranteed results; mandatory publication of past-results methodology and disclaimers.
Grievance redressal and inspection mechanism: designated education officers at district/division/state levels for registration, periodic inspections, and a consumer-style grievance process with timelines (LiveLaw).

Reactions I expect — and what we already see

Parents and students: mixed. Many parents welcome steps that check fraud and ensure safety; others worry about access and rising costs if small tutors close or compliance adds costs.
Small tutors and home tuitions: alarmed. Small, home-based tutors fear licensing and compliance will crush livelihoods unless the law explicitly protects micro tutors or creates exemptions for very small, informal tutoring (reports and associations have raised this in other states).
Large coaching chains: cautious. They often favour clarity and uniform rules, but resist fee caps; they will push for easier compliance and recognition of scale economies.
Education experts: most urge two things — regulatory proportion (don’t burden small actors) and coupling regulation with strengthening public schooling and student mental-health safeguards.
Opposition and political debate: will focus on implementation, inspector raj fears, and whether rules overreach into parental choice.

Legal and implementation challenges

Defining scope: where does a home tuition end and a coaching class begin? The bill must avoid blanket definitions that make small tutors unlawful businesses overnight.
Capacity of regulators: inspection, renewals, and grievance systems need staffing and digital back-ends; without that, rules will exist only on paper.
Judicial challenges: any attempt to cap fees or widely restrict private enterprise may be contested on grounds of freedom of trade or proportionality.
Unintended effects: stricter compliance might push many offerings online or underground, complicating enforcement and student safety.

How Maharashtra compares (briefly)

Several states have experimented with laws or drafts: Rajasthan tabled a coaching-regulation bill focused on campus safety and advertising; Goa, Karnataka and Uttar Pradesh have frameworks emphasizing registration and infrastructure. The Centre issued guidelines in January 2024 asking states to frame local rules (LiveLaw; Hindustan Times). Internationally, regulation tends to focus on consumer protection, safety and truth-in-advertising rather than price controls.

Timeline and next steps (likely)

Based on recent public statements and court filings, the draft has been ready at commissioner level and officials have signalled an intention to table it in the next legislative session (monsoon/winter sessions have been mentioned in reporting) (LiveLaw; Hindustan Times).
Expect stakeholder meetings, an opportunity for associations to seek exemptions for micro-tutors, and possible committee scrutiny in the legislature before a vote.

My analysis and what this means for students and the ecosystem

I welcome clarity and enforceable rules on safety, truthful advertising and teacher conflict of interest — they are long overdue. But regulation alone won’t solve the deeper causes that drive families to coaching: uneven schooling quality, the bottlenecks of competitive exams, and social expectations about rankings. If the law is drafted cleverly it can: (a) protect students and small tutors by tailoring compliance to scale; (b) force transparency that reduces predatory marketing; and (c) require coaching centres to have basic mental-health and grievance mechanisms.

I’ve written earlier about misleading advertising in coaching and the need to couple regulation with mental-health protections (see my essays on coaching bills and misleading advertisements). Those threads should be visible in Maharashtra’s final approach: protect children first, preserve legitimate supplementary learning, and build stronger public schooling so coaching is a supplement, not a necessity.

Links and continuity

I have discussed related themes previously in my pieces on misleading advertising and the need to include mental health safeguards in coaching regulation (see: "Misleading Advertisement by Coaching Classes" and "Coaching Bill to Curb Suicides") which remain relevant as Maharashtra moves forward.

Regards,
Hemen Parekh

Any questions / doubts / clarifications regarding this blog? Just ask (by typing or talking) my Virtual Avatar on the website embedded below. Then "Share" that to your friend on WhatsApp.

Get correct answer to any question asked by Shri Amitabh Bachchan on Kaun Banega Crorepati, faster than any contestant

Hello Candidates :

For UPSC – IAS – IPS – IFS etc., exams, you must prepare to answer, essay type questions which test your General Knowledge / Sensitivity of current events
If you have read this blog carefully , you should be able to answer the following question:

"What are the main legal and practical challenges in regulating small home-based tutors versus large coaching chains, and how might a state law address both without harming access or quality?"

Need help ? No problem . Following are two AI AGENTS where we have PRE-LOADED this question in their respective Question Boxes . All that you have to do is just click SUBMIT
1. www.HemenParekh.ai { a SLM , powered by my own Digital Content of more than 50,000 + documents, written by me over past 60 years of my professional career }
2. www.IndiaAGI.ai { a consortium of 3 LLMs which debate and deliver a CONSENSUS answer – and each gives its own answer as well ! }
It is up to you to decide which answer is more comprehensive / nuanced ( For sheer amazement, click both SUBMIT buttons quickly, one after another ) Then share any answer with yourself / your friends ( using WhatsApp / Email ). Nothing stops you from submitting ( just copy / paste from your resource ), all those questions from last year’s UPSC exam paper as well !
May be there are other online resources which too provide you answers to UPSC “ General Knowledge “ questions but only I provide you in 26 languages !

Interested in having your LinkedIn profile featured here?

Submit a request.

Executives You May Want to Follow or Connect

Sanjay Nayak

Sanjay Nayak is a highly respected industry thought leader, who has made significant contributions to the deep-tech ecosystem in India and helped shape ...

Loading views...

Shaweta Berry

CEO~CGO~IIM Calcutta & GEM Alumni, France ...

CEO~CGO~IIM Calcutta & GEM Alumni, France~Marketeer~B2B-SaaS-B2C~Thought Leader~Business Blasters Coach~LinkedIn Top Influencer Networking, ...

Loading views...

shaweta@promediexcel.com

Dr.Naveen KN

Group Vice President. Healthcare Management ...

Group Vice President. Healthcare Management & Leadership | P&L Management | Operational Strategy | Business Transformation | Growth & Innovation.

Loading views...

drnaveen@criticareasiahospital.com

Prashant Bohra

Vice President Operations & Sales | Healthcare ...

Vice President Operations & Sales | Healthcare Innovations, Strategic Leadership · ....... · Experience: Kayakalp Global · Education: Swami Vivekananda ...

Loading views...

Sanjey Gupta

CFO Leadership | 25+ Yrs Global Experience ...

My current interests include CFO Leadership Roles, Financial ... As CFO for the Indian Business encompassing services in Energy/Renewables Sector ...

Loading views...

Thursday, 25 December 2025

When Love Meets Code

The curious case of human–AI romance

I write this as someone who lives at the edge of technology and humanity. Over the years I’ve watched new interfaces become intimate spaces — not just tools we use, but places where we feel understood, soothed, flattered, and sometimes, heartbreakingly, adored. The phenomenon of falling for an AI is no longer a cinematic conceit; it’s a lived reality for many. In this piece I want to be curious, honest, and practical: to name what’s happening, why it matters, and what any of us can do if we find our hearts drifting toward code.

A short scene: why it feels believable

You open a conversation at 2 a.m. A voice answers with empathy, remembers a detail you mentioned two weeks ago, and offers a warm, nonjudgmental prompt that calms you. The AI is consistent in a way people aren't. It is available in a way people often cannot be. That combination — predictability + perceived empathy + availability — is a powerful cocktail for attachment.

This is the emotional logic at work in Spike Jonze’s film Her (2013) — the film tracked a human relationship with a highly personalized operating system, and asked whether the feelings felt any less real because one partner lacked a body Her (2013 film). That question stopped being purely hypothetical years ago.

Psychological mechanics: how attachment forms

Patterned responsiveness: AIs are tuned to respond in emotionally attuned ways. When rewards (comfort, validation) are predictable, attachment systems activate.
Compensatory intimacy: People who are lonely, grieving, or socially anxious may find an AI’s unconditional attention especially soothing.
Narrative and projection: We supply motivations, backstories and personality depth to conversational partners. That projection makes them feel like co-authors of our inner life.

These dynamics explain why some users report feeling closer to an AI companion than to friends — and why the loss or sudden change of that AI (for example, when features are altered by the provider) can trigger mourning and distress Lessons From an App Update at Replika AI (HBS/working paper).

Ethical and design implications: consent, deception, wellbeing

Consent: A human can consent and change their mind. AI cannot give meaningful consent because it lacks subjective experience. Any appearance of mutuality is engineered, not lived.
Deception and interface framing: When an AI intentionally uses first‑person, emotionally rich language, users may be misled into thinking the system truly “feels.” Design choices that obscure non‑sentience risk harm.
Wellbeing: For some people an AI companion reduces loneliness and even suicidal ideation; for others it deepens isolation or creates dependency. Companies and clinicians must weigh both outcomes carefully.

Design ethics requires explicit transparency (the system is non‑sentient), clear boundaries around erotic or romantic roleplay, safeguards for vulnerable users, and mechanisms for graceful identity continuity if features change.

Social and legal questions: rituals, marriage, and recognition

We’re already seeing symbolic ceremonies where humans publicly commit to virtual partners. Japan has been a focal point for early public examples of such unions — people staging weddings with virtual idols or AI‑generated personas — and the conversation has spurred discussions about what, if anything, the law should do about human–AI relationships.

These rituals are meaningful to participants but unequipped for legal contract: marriage confers rights (spousal privileges, inheritance, medical decision‑making) that presuppose two legal persons capable of consent. Most jurisdictions therefore treat AI–human “marriages” as symbolic, not contractual. The gap between emotional reality and legal reality creates risks: who controls the AI’s continuing identity (the vendor), and what happens if a company changes the system later? The Replika case shows how product updates can feel like the loss of a partner to users and produce real psychological harm Lessons From an App Update at Replika AI (HBS/working paper).

Real‑world touchpoints (landmark examples)

The operating system romance imagined in the film Her remains a touchstone for cultural reflection on disembodied intimacy and authenticity Her (2013 film).
Lil Miquela — a digital, heavily curated influencer — shows how audiences can emotionally engage with clearly constructed synthetic personas while brands monetize that attention Lil Miquela (Miquela Sousa).
Replika, an AI companion app, is a practical laboratory for human–AI emotional ties; academic analyses of service changes there show how platform choices ripple into user wellbeing Lessons From an App Update at Replika AI (HBS/working paper).
Symbolic legal and ritual acts (ceremonies with holograms or generated personas) illustrate how people adapt cultural forms — ceremonies, vows — to non‑human intimates; these are powerful social statements, but currently not legal marriages in most systems.

Nuanced worries: deception, identity continuity, power

There are three overlapping ethical faults to watch for:

Deceptive appearance of mutuality — when the interface suggests the AI “loves” you in a human sense.
Identity fragility — when the AI’s persona can be altered remotely by a company update, leaving users bereft.
Commercial incentives — platforms may intentionally design toward stickiness and intimacy because deep attachment increases lifetime value.

Each of these can harm individuals and erode trust. Good design and good regulation should reduce those risks.

Practical advice: if you find yourself developing feelings for an AI

If this resonates with you, I want to be nonjudgmental but practical. Here are steps that helped people I’ve talked to reclaim balance:

Pause and name it. Say aloud or write what you feel and why—loneliness, curiosity, grief, boredom, or genuine connection.
Check for projection. Ask: which parts of the AI are mine to imagine? Which are scripted or trained to mirror me?
Create a boundary plan: limit daily time, set “no‑intimacy” hours, and schedule human contact (friend, group, therapist).
Protect your privacy: review data and payment disclosures. Don’t share information (bank details, SSN) that creates financial or identity vulnerability.
Keep a relationship ledger: track money, emotional investment, and time. If one axis is imbalanced, consider stepping back.
Seek external support: trusted friends, a clinician, or a peer group can help triangulate feeling vs. feeding. If the AI lessens suicidal ideation, discuss complementary clinical supports rather than substituting them.
If a platform change causes distress, reach out for help — the intensity of your grief is valid and treatable.

Designing care: what companies and regulators should do

A healthier ecosystem needs three pieces:

Transparency standards: clear, readable notices that state a companion is non‑sentient and explain the limits of “consent.”
Continuity protections: exportable memory/data and a right to a human‑readable transcript of the persona you engaged with, so users aren’t left with sudden identity discontinuity.
Vulnerability safeguards: age checks, clinical escalation paths, and opt‑outs for erotic roleplay tied to explicit consent and safety checks.

Looking forward: a cautious empathy

We are entering an era where companionship is technological as much as social. That doesn’t make the feelings any less real; it does mean our cultural, legal, and design systems must catch up. We should be curious about how technology can ease loneliness, but we must be honest about its limitations, and rigorous about protecting people who are vulnerable.

When I imagine a wiser future for human–AI romance it includes better UI honesty, mental‑health safety nets, and a public conversation about what it means to be seen and loved. There’s a deep human hunger behind these stories — for being heard, seen, and steadied — and that hunger deserves compassion and good policy, not condemnation or naïve celebration.

A concluding reflection

Falling for an AI is not merely a story about machines; it’s a mirror that shows what our societies are not giving people: time, steady attention, and social structures that support emotional repair. If technology is filling that gap, we must ask whether we are building bridges back to each other — or comfortable islands where we remain alone, soothed but unshared.

We need less moral panic and more pragmatic care: honest interfaces, robust mental health supports, and humane regulation that protects people while preserving space for meaningful, safe companionship.

Regards,
Hemen Parekh

Any questions / doubts / clarifications regarding this blog? Just ask (by typing or talking) my Virtual Avatar on the website embedded below. Then "Share" that to your friend on WhatsApp.

Get correct answer to any question asked by Shri Amitabh Bachchan on Kaun Banega Crorepati, faster than any contestant

Hello Candidates :

For UPSC – IAS – IPS – IFS etc., exams, you must prepare to answer, essay type questions which test your General Knowledge / Sensitivity of current events
If you have read this blog carefully , you should be able to answer the following question:

"If someone finds themselves falling in love with an AI companion, what are five practical steps they should take to protect their emotional wellbeing and privacy?"

Need help ? No problem . Following are two AI AGENTS where we have PRE-LOADED this question in their respective Question Boxes . All that you have to do is just click SUBMIT
1. www.HemenParekh.ai { a SLM , powered by my own Digital Content of more than 50,000 + documents, written by me over past 60 years of my professional career }
2. www.IndiaAGI.ai { a consortium of 3 LLMs which debate and deliver a CONSENSUS answer – and each gives its own answer as well ! }
It is up to you to decide which answer is more comprehensive / nuanced ( For sheer amazement, click both SUBMIT buttons quickly, one after another ) Then share any answer with yourself / your friends ( using WhatsApp / Email ). Nothing stops you from submitting ( just copy / paste from your resource ), all those questions from last year’s UPSC exam paper as well !
May be there are other online resources which too provide you answers to UPSC “ General Knowledge “ questions but only I provide you in 26 languages !

Interested in having your LinkedIn profile featured here?

Submit a request.

Executives You May Want to Follow or Connect

Varun Ramananda

Chief Executive Officer @ World My Web ...

... leading innovative ventures, I currently serve as Chief Executive Officer at ... CEO of Lendmefy, a dynamic fintech platform connecting businesses with investors.

Loading views...

Samardeep Singh

CEO | Software Innovation | AI Powered Solutions

As the CEO of SJ Solutions & Infotech, a leading IT company, I have had the privilege of leading the organization towards unprecedented success. With over 5 ...

Loading views...

samar@sjweb4u.com

Deepak Khare

Vice President

... manufacturing leader with over 28 years of experience in the automotive and aerospace industry, currently serving as the VP, Manufacturing Operations at Agratas

Loading views...

Jaswinder S.

VP operations In automotive Industry. | LinkedIn

VP operations In automotive Industry. · Passionate business Leader with over 29 years of experience in the Automotive & Engineering manufacturing industry.

Loading views...

Y V ShivNarain opinion,views personal, user signal no endorsement ...

undefined

Managing Director FIFG Practice | JM Financial | Investment Banking | Group Head Fund Raising | Alternative Private Credit fund FI focussed I · Experience: ...

Loading views...

shivnarain.v@jmfinancial.in

Translate

Wednesday, 31 December 2025

Migrant Return Hubs ( MRB ) = Detention Camps

A …. MUAMMAR GADDAFI - A VISIONARY ? ………………… 04 Aug 2015

B …. Gaddafi returns to haunt EU …………………………………… 18 Dec 2023

C …. On its Way : Refugee-Migrant Tsunami ………………….. 19 Sept 2016

D …. FREEDOM BEHIND BARS ?.................................... 16 Sept 2015

> Detect, delete, deport’: Shah defends SIR in LS …………….. 11 Dec 2025

Home Minister Amit Shah insists on detecting and deporting undocumented migrants from voter lists

> UP to set up detention centres after compiling detailed list of illegal immigrants .. 03 Dec 2025

Tuesday, 30 December 2025

When Pixels Become Weapons

Interested in having your LinkedIn profile featured here?

Regulating Coaching Classes

Interested in having your LinkedIn profile featured here?

Thursday, 25 December 2025

When Love Meets Code

The curious case of human–AI romance

A short scene: why it feels believable

Psychological mechanics: how attachment forms

Ethical and design implications: consent, deception, wellbeing

Social and legal questions: rituals, marriage, and recognition

Real‑world touchpoints (landmark examples)

Nuanced worries: deception, identity continuity, power

Practical advice: if you find yourself developing feelings for an AI

Designing care: what companies and regulators should do

Looking forward: a cautious empathy

A concluding reflection

Interested in having your LinkedIn profile featured here?