Hi Friends,

Even as I launch this today ( my 80th Birthday ), I realize that there is yet so much to say and do. There is just no time to look back, no time to wonder,"Will anyone read these pages?"

With regards,
Hemen Parekh
27 June 2013

Now as I approach my 90th birthday ( 27 June 2023 ) , I invite you to visit my Digital Avatar ( www.hemenparekh.ai ) – and continue chatting with me , even when I am no more here physically

Translate

Wednesday, 7 January 2026

AGI Feud Intensifies

AGI Feud Intensifies

Why the AGI feud matters to all of us

I watch the public sparring between Sam Altman (sama@openai.com) and Elon Musk (referralprogram@tesla.com) with more than a technologist’s curiosity — I see a story about governance, power, and the routes by which transformative technology becomes concentrated or distributed.

Recently the feud escalated again, and much of the coverage referenced reporting and an explanatory piece from the Los Angeles Times that lays out the legal and strategic stakes in clear terms (LA Times explainer). That report is a useful primer: it shows how personal disagreements have bled into lawsuits, competitive launches, and public rhetoric — while the underlying issue is who will steer AGI and under what institutional guardrails.

What was reported — and what we should treat cautiously

According to reports, exchanges between Sam Altman (sama@openai.com) and Elon Musk (referralprogram@tesla.com) have amplified after a sequence of legal filings, public posts and competitive product rollouts. Journalists relay certain claims and private emails in court documents; that’s important context, but it’s also crucial to avoid treating reported private conversations as established fact. I’m deliberately careful in this piece: when I say something was said to the other party, I’m referring to what’s been reported in public filings or reputable reporting, not private confirmation.

Why that matters: the shape of truth in these disputes is often legal and documentary. A leaked email or a courtroom filing can change perceptions overnight. But the core policy question — how to steward systems that may one day rival general human cognitive abilities — isn’t answered by a tweet or a barbed exchange. It’s answered by governance, funding choices, and engineering trade-offs.

The strategic dimensions — beyond personalities

There are three frames I find useful when evaluating this feud:

  • Competition for capability. The LA Times explainer notes that legacy players and new entrants are all sprinting to lead on model quality and deployment. That arms race changes incentives — companies need capital and scale, which can push organizations toward proprietary control rather than open, public goods.

  • Institutional form and trust. Reports show Sam Altman (sama@openai.com) and Elon Musk (referralprogram@tesla.com) disagree sharply on how OpenAI’s structure should balance profit, safety, and public missions. Lawsuits and filings aren’t just theater; they test whether a company’s charter can be enforced when incentives shift.

  • Public accountability. When two influential founders fight, regulators and the public take notice. The LA Times piece helps trace how private agreements and board choices can have public consequences — from contracts with cloud providers to what models get released and how.

My reading: what should worry us, and what gives me hope

I worry when debate devolves into personality warfare because the nuance gets lost. The stakes of AGI governance are structural: procurement of compute, IP licensing, ecosystem lock-in, and the norms around staged model releases. When Sam Altman (sama@openai.com) and Elon Musk (referralprogram@tesla.com) trade barbs, it’s easy to miss whether those structural pieces are being addressed.

And yet there are reasons to be cautiously optimistic. Competition can spur safety investments and transparency commitments when paired with public pressure. The courtroom scrutiny and journalism this dispute has prompted are forcing clearer explanations of corporate structure and obligations — exactly the kind of scrutiny complex technology firms need.

What I recommend watching closely

  • Legal outcomes that clarify how founding pledges and donor agreements are enforced.
  • Product deployment choices: who gets priority access to new capabilities and on what contractual terms.
  • Governance experiments: whether for-profit/mission hybrids can reliably lock in public-benefit commitments.

If you want a concise explainer of the current state of play, the LA Times article is a solid starting point: https://www.latimes.com/entertainment-arts/business/story/2025-03-10/elon-musk-sam-altman-openai-xai. I’ve found it useful precisely because it separates the personalities from the structures that will outlast them.

Final thought

As someone who thinks about long-term trajectories for technology, I don’t want to root for one executive over another. I want robust institutions — legal, technical, and civic — that can manage the risks and distribute the benefits. The feud between Sam Altman (sama@openai.com) and Elon Musk (referralprogram@tesla.com) is dramatic, and it shapes narratives. But the real work is deeper: designing the checks, contracts, and incentives so that AGI, whenever it arrives, serves broad human interests.


Regards,
Hemen Parekh


Any questions / doubts / clarifications regarding this blog? Just ask (by typing or talking) my Virtual Avatar on the website embedded below. Then "Share" that to your friend on WhatsApp.

Get correct answer to any question asked by Shri Amitabh Bachchan on Kaun Banega Crorepati, faster than any contestant


Hello Candidates :

  • For UPSC – IAS – IPS – IFS etc., exams, you must prepare to answer, essay type questions which test your General Knowledge / Sensitivity of current events
  • If you have read this blog carefully , you should be able to answer the following question:
"What are the main governance risks when leading AI companies shift from non-profit to hybrid or for-profit structures?"
  • Need help ? No problem . Following are two AI AGENTS where we have PRE-LOADED this question in their respective Question Boxes . All that you have to do is just click SUBMIT
    1. www.HemenParekh.ai { a SLM , powered by my own Digital Content of more than 50,000 + documents, written by me over past 60 years of my professional career }
    2. www.IndiaAGI.ai { a consortium of 3 LLMs which debate and deliver a CONSENSUS answer – and each gives its own answer as well ! }
  • It is up to you to decide which answer is more comprehensive / nuanced ( For sheer amazement, click both SUBMIT buttons quickly, one after another ) Then share any answer with yourself / your friends ( using WhatsApp / Email ). Nothing stops you from submitting ( just copy / paste from your resource ), all those questions from last year’s UPSC exam paper as well !
  • May be there are other online resources which too provide you answers to UPSC “ General Knowledge “ questions but only I provide you in 26 languages !




Interested in having your LinkedIn profile featured here?

Submit a request.
Executives You May Want to Follow or Connect
Rakshit Kalra
Rakshit Kalra
Leading Technology Innovation and Growth in ...
I have held leadership roles in top companies, driving innovation and optimization in technology deployments. ... Vice President of Software Engineering.
Loading views...
rakshit@axiscards.com
Amit Jaju
Amit Jaju
Global Partner | LinkedIn Top Voice
... Software License Forensics and Innovation. I was responsible for business development, delivery, talent management & operations. I also served as the ...
Loading views...
amit.jaju@ankura.com
Amit Ramchandani
Amit Ramchandani
CEO and Head
CEO and Head - Investment Banking at Motilal Oswal Financial Services · Managing Director, Investment Banking - JM Financial. · Experience: Motilal Oswal ...
Loading views...
amit.ramchandani@motilaloswal.com
Nitin Garg
Nitin Garg
Executive Vice President and Global Leader for CIB ...
Head of Investment Banking Solution. Evalueserve Graphic. Group Manager, Financial Services. Evalueserve. Aug 2004 - May 2006 1 year 10 months. Gurgaon, India.
Loading views...
nitin.garg@evalueserve.com
Jithesh Prasad
Jithesh Prasad
CEO – Healthcare @ SRIT India Ltd. | Healthcare IT ...
CEO – Healthcare @ SRIT India Ltd. | Healthcare IT Leader | Driving Digital Transformation | RCM & HIS/EMR Solutions | Strategic Partnerships | Customer ...
Loading views...
jithesh.p@sritindia.com

No comments:

Post a Comment