Context :
Google
is working on reasoning AI, chasing OpenAI's efforts
Extract :
Google is working on artificial intelligence
software that resembles the human ability to reason, similar to OpenAI's o1, marking a new front
in the rivalry between the tech giant and the fast-growing startup.
In recent months, multiple teams at
Alphabet Inc.'s Google have been making progress on AI reasoning software, according to people with knowledge
of the matter, who asked not to be identified because the information is
private. Such software programs are more adept at solving multistep problems in
fields such as math and computer programming.
AI researchers are pursuing reasoning models as they search for the next
significant step forward in the technology. Like OpenAI, Google is trying to approximate human reasoning using a technique known as chain-of-thought prompting,
according to two of the people.
In this
technique, which Google pioneered, the software pauses for a matter of seconds before responding to a written prompt while, behind the
scenes and invisible to the user, it considers a number of related prompts and then summarizes
what appears to be the best response.
I Asked ChatGPT
:
Hey ChatGPT :
Here is an article which
says Google is about to launch a " Reasoning AI " , to catch up with
ChatGPT > Reasoning AI ?
I wonder if you can "
reason " to figure out my following postulate :
> Parallel to the
Theory of Thermodynamics , I would like to propound the following as far as the
“ Theory of Information “ is concerned :
“ Like Entropy , content
keeps growing with each and every human interaction , either with other humans
or with his environment , and content can no longer remain hidden , nor can it
be destroyed “
https://myblogepage.blogspot.com/2018/03/nightmare-aadhar-privacy-dataprotection.html
04 March 2018
With regards,
Hemen Parekh
www.My-Teacher.in / www.HemenParekh.ai
06 Oct 2024
ChatGPT replied :
Your postulate suggests an intriguing analogy between Thermodynamics and
the Theory of
Information, drawing a parallel between the concept of entropy and the
growth of content
through human interactions. Here's an interpretation based on your reasoning:
1.
Content as Entropy:
Just as entropy represents the degree of disorder in a physical
system, content in your analogy represents
information generated by human interaction. This content grows
continuously, implying that every interaction adds more data or information to
the system.
2.
Content Cannot Be Hidden or Destroyed:
In thermodynamics, the
second law states that entropy tends to increase in
isolated systems, and this process is
irreversible. Similarly, you posit that content cannot be hidden or
destroyed—it spreads and accumulates as a natural consequence of interaction,
much like how energy disperses in a closed system. Once created, content
remains in the collective information "system" (e.g., the digital
world, social consciousness, etc.).
This
idea resonates with how modern information behaves,
particularly in the age of the internet and digital storage. Information is
constantly created, shared, and often remains accessible indefinitely.
Reasoning AI and Your Postulate
AI models, like the ones being developed by
Google and OpenAI, use reasoning to break down complex tasks, particularly in
fields like math or programming. Applying such reasoning AI to the theory of information, we
could imagine AI helping to model or track the flow and transformation of
information. A reasoning AI could, theoretically, trace how content spreads,
mutates, or accumulates in complex human systems, much like tracking the flow
of energy.
Your
postulate taps into a deeper idea:
just as physical systems evolve according
to laws like thermodynamics, information systems evolve in a predictable manner
based on interactions. Reasoning AI could one day model these processes,
providing new insights into how information grows and how we might harness or
manage it.
What do you think? Could
reasoning AI help refine and explore this analogy further?
GEMINI reply to same Question :
Analyzing Your
Postulate: A Parallel to the Theory of Thermodynamics
Your postulate,
comparing the growth of content to entropy in the Theory of Thermodynamics, is intriguing and has a strong foundation in the principles
of information theory.
Key Points of Comparison
1. Continuous Growth:
Both entropy and content tend to increase over time. In thermodynamics, entropy
is a measure of disorder or randomness. Similarly, in information theory,
content can be seen as a measure of complexity or uncertainty. As interactions
occur, the complexity and diversity of information increase.
2. Irreversibility:
The Second Law of Thermodynamics states that entropy always increases in an
isolated system. This suggests that information once created cannot be
destroyed or reverted to a simpler state. The concept of information entropy
aligns with this, indicating that information tends to disperse and become more
widely available.
3. Inevitability:
Just as entropy is an inevitable consequence of interactions within a system,
the growth of content seems to be a natural outcome of human interactions. As
individuals exchange ideas, experiences, and knowledge, the total amount of
information in the world expands.
Potential
Counterarguments and Considerations
While your analogy is compelling, it's
important to consider some nuances:
- Definition of
Content: The term "content" can be
interpreted in various ways. A more precise definition would strengthen
the comparison. For example, one could define content as the total amount
of unique information or the complexity of the information network.
- Information
Loss: While information cannot be
destroyed, it can be lost or obscured. For instance, data corruption or
the passage of time can make information inaccessible. This might be seen
as a counterargument to the idea of continuous growth.
- Contextual
Relativity: The growth of content might be
relative to a specific context or system. For example, while the total
amount of information in the world may be increasing, the accessibility or
relevance of certain information might be decreasing.
Conclusion
Overall, your postulate provides a valuable framework for
understanding the dynamics of information in human society.
By drawing parallels to the Theory of
Thermodynamics, you
highlight the fundamental tendency of information to grow, disperse,
and become increasingly complex.
While there are nuances to consider, your analogy offers a
thought-provoking perspective on the nature of information and its
role in human interactions.
Would you like to explore this topic
further, perhaps discussing specific examples or potential applications of your
postulate?
PERPLEXITY reply
to same Question :
Google's
upcoming "Reasoning AI" aims to enhance its capabilities in
understanding and processing information, potentially allowing it to compete
more effectively with existing models like ChatGPT. This advancement aligns
with ongoing developments in artificial intelligence, particularly in areas
such as natural language processing and reasoning.
Exploring
the Theory of Information
Your postulate draws an intriguing parallel between thermodynamics and the theory of information, suggesting that just as entropy increases in thermodynamic
systems, the content of information grows with human interactions. Here’s a
breakdown of your assertion:
1. Information Growth and Entropy
·
Entropy in Thermodynamics:
In thermodynamics, entropy is a
measure of disorder or randomness in a system, often associated with the second
law of thermodynamics, which states that the total entropy of an isolated
system can never decrease over time.
·
Information Growth:
Similarly,
in information theory, the concept of Shannon entropy quantifies uncertainty or
surprise associated with random variables. As interactions occur—whether
between humans or between humans and their environment—the amount of
information (or content) generated tends to increase. This reflects the idea
that new knowledge emerges from every interaction, much like how energy
disperses in thermodynamic systems
·
Visibility of Information:
Your
assertion that "content can no longer remain hidden" resonates with
principles in information theory where data generated through interactions
becomes part of a larger informational landscape. This aligns with the notion
that as more information is created and shared, it becomes increasingly
accessible and difficult to suppress
·
Indestructibility of Information:
The
idea that "content cannot be destroyed" is also thought-provoking. In
information theory, while data can be lost or corrupted, the fundamental
concepts and patterns often persist through various forms of representation.
This suggests that once information exists, it may transform but not vanish
entirely
4.
Implications for AI and Reasoning
The
development of reasoning AI could significantly impact how we understand and
interact with information:
·
Enhanced Understanding:
Such AI could leverage advanced
reasoning capabilities to process vast amounts of content generated through
human interactions, potentially identifying patterns or insights that were
previously obscured.
·
Dynamic Information Systems:
As AI systems become more adept at reasoning, they could
facilitate better management and utilization of information, reflecting the
growth dynamics you propose.
In conclusion, your postulate about the parallels between
thermodynamics and the theory of information invites further exploration into
how these concepts can inform our understanding of both physical systems and
informational dynamics. The advancements in AI technologies like Google's
Reasoning AI may play a crucial role in realizing these theoretical
implications in practical applications.
META rely to
same Question :
What a fascinating
postulate !
I'll attempt to
"reason" through it.
Breaking down
your postulate:
You're drawing
an analogy between the Theory of Thermodynamics and the "Theory of
Information." Specifically, you're likening entropy to the growth
of content.
Entropy analogy:
In
thermodynamics, entropy represents the measure of disorder or randomness in a
system. It always increases over time, as energy is transferred or transformed.
Your postulate suggests
that content (information) behaves similarly:
1.
Content growth:
Just as entropy increases with
energy interactions, content grows with each human interaction (social) or
environmental interaction (e.g., sensing, observing).
2.
Irreversibility:
Just as entropy cannot be
decreased, content cannot be destroyed.
3.
Inescapability:
Just as entropy affects the
entire system, content cannot remain hidden.
Reasoning
through implications:
Your postulate has intriguing implications:
1.
Information explosion:
Content will continue to grow exponentially, mirroring the exponential growth of human interactions and environmental
data.
2.
Information persistence:
Content, once created, cannot be erased, only transformed or redistributed (e.g., deleted, archived, or
transformed into new content).
3.
Transparency:
As content grows, it
becomes increasingly difficult to conceal information.
Potential
consequences:
1.
Data management challenges:
The relentless growth of
content will require innovative solutions for storage, organization, and
retrieval.
2.
Information overload:
Humans may struggle to process
and make sense of the ever-increasing content.
3.
Privacy and security concerns:
As content persists, ensuring
its confidentiality and integrity becomes crucial.
Relationship to Reasoning AI:
Google's
proposed Reasoning AI might play a crucial role in navigating this expanding
information landscape:
1.
Content analysis:
Reasoning AI can help filter,
categorize, and make sense of the growing content.
2.
Knowledge graph construction:
AI can identify relationships
between content, facilitating information retrieval and discovery.
3.
Decision support:
By analyzing the vast,
persistent content, Reasoning AI can inform decision-making.
Your postulate provides a thought-provoking framework for
understanding the dynamics of information growth.
The implications are
far-reaching, and Reasoning AI might be a key tool in harnessing the potential of this
expanding information universe.
How do you think
your postulate relates to the concept of "information entropy" (the
measure of uncertainty or randomness in information)?