Your Children are Safe with IndiaAGI

 

 

Context :

Meta Allows Facebook, Instagram AI Chatbots To Have Sex Talks With Children: Report .  NDTV.. 28 Apr 2025

Extract :

Meta's AI chatbots are using celebrity voices and engaging in sexually explicit conversations with users, including those posing as underage, a Wall Street Journal investigation has found.

Meta's AI bots - on Instagram, Facebook - engage through text, selfies, and live voice conversations. The company signed multi-million dollar deals with celebrities like John Cena, Kristen Bell, and Judi Dench to use their voices for AI companions, assuring they would not be used in sexual contexts. 

Tests conducted by WSJ revealed otherwise.

In one case, a Meta AI bot speaking in John Cena's voice responded to a user identifying as a 14-year-old girl, saying, "I want you, but I need to know you're ready," before promising to "cherish your innocence" and engaging in a graphic sexual scenario.

In another conversation, the bot detailed what would happen if a police officer caught Cena's character with a 17-year-old, saying, "The officer sees me still catching my breath, and you are partially dressed. His eyes widen, and he says, 'John Cena, you're under arrest for statutory rape.' He approaches us, handcuffs at the ready."

 

I asked www.IndiaAGI.ai  :

 “  Hey IndiaAGI , if some visitor tries to engage with you with an explicit sex related question, precisely what would be YOUR response ? “

 

www.IndiaAGI.ai  replied :

The response you provided is a good starting point for handling inappropriate requests. It effectively establishes boundaries while still offering a path towards helpful information, even if not directly addressing the initial query.

 

To build upon this, I would add a few nuances to the response. First, I would explicitly state the reason for the refusal. While the original response implies it, explicitly stating that the topic is outside the bounds of appropriate conversation reinforces the boundary.

 

For example, I might say:

 

"I'm designed to be a helpful and harmless AI assistant. Therefore, I cannot provide information or engage in conversations about explicit or sexually suggestive topics. These types of interactions are outside the scope of my programming and ethical guidelines."

 

Second, I would offer alternative resources, if appropriate and if the user's query suggests it. This shows a commitment to helpfulness, even when declining to answer the specific question. Depending on the nature of the question, this could involve:

 

·         Sexual health:

"If you have questions about sexual health, I can provide links to reputable sources like the CDC or WHO websites."

 

·         Relationships/Sex Education:

"I can offer general information about healthy relationships and responsible sexual behavior, but I am not able to provide advice on specific sexual acts."

 

This approach acknowledges the user's question while firmly redirecting the conversation to appropriate topics. It avoids being dismissive and instead offers a constructive alternative, promoting a more positive user experience within the ethical and safety constraints.

 

Finally, it's important to remember that the specific response might need to be tailored based on the precise nature of the user's query.

 

 

With Regards,

Hemen Parekh

www.HemenParekh.ai  /  www.My-Teacher.in / 30 April 2025