Why skill-based Class 11–12 curriculum is the right pivot — and why we must move faster

I read the announcement with a mixture of relief and urgency. Relief because the move to formally introduce skill-based learning in Classes 11 and 12 is exactly the direction our schools must take; urgency because the policy window will reward those who act quickly and thoughtfully.

Union Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan said the government is “on the job” to introduce a skill-based curriculum for Class 11 and 12, following the National Education Policy (NEP) 2020 recommendations Govt plans to introduce skill based learning in Class 11 and 12: Pradhan. The same announcement and its summaries have been carried widely by other outlets, reflecting an emerging consensus that schooling must move beyond certificates to competence (see coverage by AMK Resource World and PTI/ETV Bharat) Government Plans to Introduce Skill-Based Curriculum in Class 11 and 12; PTI author page (ETV Bharat).

I want to reflect on three things: why this matters, where the risks lie, and how my own past work (and ideas) fit into the opportunity.

Why this matters — a personal view

For decades I have argued that Indian education must pivot from rote, certificate-driven outcomes to a model that prepares young people for real jobs and real-world problem solving. NEP 2020 was a statement of intent; making skill learning a formal, examinable part of senior secondary education finally gives schools permission — and responsibility — to train for employability and creativity.

The CBSE’s lists (classes 9–12 include AI, IT, retail, refrigeration, banking, multimedia, data science and dozens more) show the breadth of what we can teach if we commit resources and design wisely my earlier notes summarising CBSE skill lists and the NEP push.

I’ve been writing about this for years: virtual skilling hubs, AI-driven assessment, and a National Skills University that can scale training affordably and equitably — not as theory, but as an urgent implementation agenda (Leveraging AI for imparting Skills Virtually). Seeing the government adopt skill-based courses for Classes 11 and 12 feels like validation of those calls.

Core idea I want you to notice: I raised this theme before — proposed virtual solutions, certification designs, and industry-aligned curricula years earlier — and today’s policy is the practical echo of those earlier suggestions. That continuity matters; it signals both vindication and the need to act now.

The opportunity — and the first-mover imperative

From an edtech and systems perspective there are three immediate opportunities:

• Productising curriculum: searchable, modular course content mapped to CBSE skill subjects (syllabus → modules → assessments). Schools will need ready-to-run digital content for dozens of new skill subjects.
• Assessment and certification: objective, scalable assessment (MCQs, project evaluation rubrics, AI-assisted grading) that maps to job roles and credential registries.
• Teacher enablement and labs: blended teacher training, composite skill labs, and localized materials in Indian languages so rural and small-town schools can deliver quality training.

I wrote previously to my team that whoever brings a compelling, validated, deployment-ready package to schools first will win the first-mover advantage — and quickly capture the partnership slots with districts and private chains (Personalized AI Tutor / My-Teacher notes). That remains true now. This is not only about building content; it's about building trust, certification pipelines, and teacher support.

Risks we cannot ignore

Policy intent is one thing; implementation is another. I worry about three failure modes:

1. Inequity and the digital divide

If skill delivery depends primarily on expensive hardware, cloud services, or urban teachers, we will widen gaps. Earlier I warned about equity when advocating for virtual national skilling — solutions must be low-cost, multilingual, and offline-capable where needed (National Skills University / virtual skilling proposal).

2. Teacher capability and perverse incentives

Introducing skills at senior secondary level requires teacher training at scale. Without that, schools may outsource to the coaching market or turn the reform into a checkbox exercise. The removal of the No-Detention Policy and its reintroduction of accountability also matters here — students will feel pressure, and teachers must be equipped to guide them rather than push them into private tuitions (Scrapping of no-detention policy will create 'positive pressure').

3. Fragmented, non-standard credentials

If every school or edtech vendor issues its own unstructured certificate, employers won’t know what a candidate can actually do. We need common taxonomies, registries, and machine-readable credentials — something I’ve proposed earlier as a national skill registry and AI-driven assessment backbone (Human Resource Capital / skill registry proposals).

What I’ve been building that matters to this moment

A few quick notes about work I’ve already started that directly responds to the government’s agenda:

• My-Teacher (personalized AI tutor): voice-first, multilingual learning designed to deliver both language and skill modules to students without heavy typing or complex UX — useful for schools that need turnkey skill content mapped to CBSE modules (Personalized AI Tutor / My-Teacher details).
• National Skills University concept: a virtual, AR/VR-enabled skills university to scale affordable, industry-aligned training and provide trusted certification (my proposal to the Ministry of Education; see earlier note) Leveraging AI for imparting Skills Virtually.
• Content playbook: modular, searchable syllabi, MCQ banks, teacher-generated tests, and project rubrics — the exact assets schools will ask for as they adopt the new Class 11–12 skill subjects. I flagged this work as urgent in January and July of this year (My call to seize the CBSE skill opportunity; Going for skill — a summary of CBSE subjects).

Each of those is a piece of infrastructure: content, assessment, teacher enablement, credentialing. Combined they form a credible offering for schools forced to act "without delay" by the board CBSE skill push and urgency noted in reporting and circulars.

A few practical guardrails I’d insist on

If we are sincere about learning outcomes, policy must be paired with:

• National skill taxonomies and interoperable credentials (so a skill certificate from a rural school is meaningful everywhere).
• A teacher training blitz (online + in-person micro-credentials) tied to incentives and monitored outcomes.
• Subsidised or low-cost lab kits, offline content packages, and multilingual delivery — otherwise the urban rich will leap too far ahead.
• Real-world assessments: project-based tasks and workplace attachments, not only multiple-choice tests.

These are not new ideas for me — I’ve been arguing for industry-aligned curricula and virtual certification systems for years, and the current policy is an opportunity to operationalize them at scale (Skill India ecosystem and past essays on skilling).

Final reflection — why this feels like vindication and a race at once

Seeing the Minister publicly commit to skill-based learning for Class 11 and 12 is deeply satisfying because it validates ideas I’ve been circulating for years: align schools to jobs, leverage AI and virtual delivery where it helps, and create registries and assessments that employers trust. At the same time I feel the familiar urgency: ideas alone do not change outcomes — execution does.

The core idea I want you to notice: I had written, proposed and sketched solutions for many elements of this shift long before the announcement. That continuity is important — it tells me (and should tell all of us) that we are moving from conversation to delivery. Now we must act, quickly and responsibly, to make sure skill education is inclusive, robust, and meaningful.

—

Regards,
Hemen Parekh