When Garba Goes Viral: AI, Memory, and the Magnetic Field of Collective Thought

I watched a hundred faces spin across my screen—different colors of chaniya choli, mirrorwork catching impossible light, and the effortless choreography of an idea spreading. The article that sparked it all talked about how AI-generated Garba looks have gone viral on Instagram, a follow-up to the vintage saree craze and now a new way of dressing memory with pixels and prompts (After vintage saree craze, AI-generated Garba and Navratri looks go viral on Instagram).

Reading that piece placed me in a familiar wonder: technology refracting culture, and culture reflecting back a thousand variations of itself. I also scrolled through other corners of the internet—news sitemaps and culture pages that map the broader conversation—like Free Press Journal, Naidunia, and the culture section of TheUNN. Archived reports and creative prompt guides add texture to the scene (NDTV archives Sept 2025, NDTV archives Jun 2025, DocsBot prompts). I even let myself drift through a few cultural and academic touchstones (Sridevi: The Eternal Screen Goddess, Mass Communication in India) and a singer’s page whose voice carries so many of our shared festivals (Shreya Ghoshal). All of these links trace the same river: how we make meaning together.

Thoughts as magnetic fields

My mind keeps returning to a metaphor I've lived with for years: thoughts are like magnetic fields. When a crowd thinks, those fields overlap, repel, and reinforce. Good thoughts—not abstractly good but kind, generous, and rooted in respect—have the capacity to neutralize harsher currents. Watching a viral trend like AI Garba, I see more than aesthetics. I see currents.

AI tools like Google Gemini or image generators are not mere instruments; they are amplifiers of the fields already present. A prompt—the simple string of words that births a reel—acts like a current in a conductor. It channels shared longing, nostalgia, aspiration. Sometimes the result is tender: a remembered grandmother’s embroidered hem reimagined with loving care. Other times it’s hollow, flattening context into commodity.

The delicate weave of authenticity and invention

There is a strange moral grammar when tradition meets synthetic creativity. On one hand, I am moved by how AI can resurrect forgotten patterns, introduce a young person to Garba who never danced with their family, or let a diaspora recreate the smell of a festival through imagery. On the other, I worry about erasure disguised as novelty—when algorithmic remixing detaches a craft from the hands that made it.

This is not a techno‑fear so much as a plea for attention. Who benefits when a viral reel collects likes? Whose labor disappears behind the glossy render? The articles and guides that circulate—how‑tos, top prompts, step‑by‑step reels—are practical, yes (IndiaTimes guide, DocsBot prompts). But they can also skate past the lived histories embedded in every mirror, stitch, and jingle.

Loneliness, companionship, and the weight of destiny

I am moved as much by the social as by the personal. In my poems I have written: "I just kept walking, kept watching, forever asking: 'Are you my true companion?'" That question is quiet but it hums beneath this whole phenomenon. We use images and shared rituals not only to remember, but to belong.

Yet belonging is ambivalent. A viral Garba reel can create a momentary sense of togetherness—a crowd of strangers connected by a scroll. But the magnetic fields of social attention are fickle. The same currents that lift a feel‑good trend can sweep away nuance, leaving you with glossy images and a deeper sense of isolation. We applaud a beautiful render, and sometimes forget the craftspeople, the stories, the real hands behind the motifs.

What I worry about for the next generations

My deepest concern is generational. The children who inherit these currents will navigate an environment where memory and culture are increasingly mediated by algorithms. That mediation can be liberating—the chance to remix, to learn across distances, to keep small traditions alive in new forms. It can also be disorienting. If the cultural signals they receive are flattened by virality and optimized for engagement, their map of who they are will be fuzzier.

This is why the notion of "good thoughts" matters beyond poetic aphorism. If we cultivate care—if we think of lineage, context, and respect when we prompt and post—then these digital currents can illuminate paths rather than erase them. We must aim for amplification that honors origin stories, not annihilates them.

A final, quiet invitation

I do not offer solutions here. I only bring my small observation: when thousands of tiny intentions interact, they make a field. I have seen that good intentions can counteract the harsher ones. I have also felt the loneliness that persists amid viral joy and applause.

So when I see an AI Garba reel—beautiful, clever, imperfect—I try to hold both impulses: the joy of being moved by shared creativity, and the responsibility to remember the hands and histories that gave birth to that joy. Perhaps that is the work we can give to our children and grandchildren: not shield them from change, but teach them how to read the fields around them, how to send currents of care.

---

Regards,
Hemen Parekh