$100k H‑1B fee: a shock — and a déjà vu I've been warning about

I woke up to the news that the U.S. administration has set a one‑time H‑1B fee of $100,000. The immediate reaction across Indian tech corridors — panic, spreadsheets, frantic calls home, and recruiters asking brutal questions about economics and talent mobility — felt painfully familiar. The reporting captures the shock: the fee is being described as higher than the annual salaries of many professionals and is already nudging firms to consider alternatives such as L‑1 intra‑company transfers, with all their own limits and scrutiny Times of India and MSN coverage corroborating the upheaval.MSN

What this fee really changes — on paper and in life

• For many employers the fee is simply unaffordable for mid‑level hires. Legal counsel and HR teams will re‑calculate the ROI for every sponsored hire.
• The predictable pivot is to L‑1 visas or to accelerating offshoring; yet L‑1 is not a universal replacement — it requires prior overseas employment and is under increasing scrutiny itself.
• The human cost is immediate: uncertainty for thousands of professionals, disrupted plans, cancelled travel and relocation, and the psychological toll of suddenly being treated as an expensive regulatory commodity rather than a member of a team.

The reporting has already captured these dynamics — that firms may move roles offshore, that workers will reconsider migration, and that countries like India might gain unintended advantage from the policy shift Times of India.

Why this feels like dejà vu for me

I have written about the structural dynamics between Indian talent, global companies, and policy choices for years. The core idea I keep returning to is this — notice that I brought up these tensions and responses long before many of them were front‑page news. I argued that India’s cost advantage, its growing R&D footprint, and the fragility of cross‑border talent flows would create both risk and opportunity.

• Years ago I suggested building platforms to connect recruiters and talent more effectively — the seed of an OnlineJobsFair idea that anticipated more fluid, resilient hiring models OnlineJobsFair idea.See: "OnlineJobsFair.com"
• In a 2017 essay I urged that India lean into being the "Brain Factory of the World" — exporting intellectual property, higher‑value R&D and capturing more of the margin that today sits with global buyers Brain Inc 2.0.See: "Brain Inc 2.0"
• I noted the cost arbitrage between India and H‑1B wages repeatedly, and asked whether India could convert that arbitrage into far larger revenue and IP wealth for itself MNC hiring in India.See: "MNC hiring in India"

Seeing the H‑1B fee news unfold now is both validating and urgent. Validating because the contours I described — companies hedging, talent flows shifting, a race to capture higher value work — are exactly what I warned would matter. Urgent because policy shocks like this accelerate decisions: firms will offshore faster, governments will need to respond, and people’s lives will be pushed into abrupt change.

The consequences I worry about — practical and strategic

• Short term: an increase in last‑minute travel, confusion about who the rule applies to, and a spike in employers calling employees back to the U.S. or asking them not to travel. Anxiety will be high among those with pending plans Times of India coverage of travel reactions.
• Medium term: more roles stay offshore, and employers will invest in local centres of excellence in India or other geographies — which could be a win for jobs back home but risks perpetuating a model where India earns lower value capture.
• Long term: opportunity for India to convert this disruption into deliberate strategy — not merely more seats on a call, but more product ownership, IP export, and premium R&D billing.

What I keep returning to — not as a manifesto but as a hard reality

From my prior writing I remain convinced that India must stop being only the low‑cost execution base and move up the stack. The facts I used to highlight then still matter now:

• Indian teams have proven they can deliver world‑class R&D and products. The Watson Data Platform, high‑voltage transformers, and global SAP R&D are not accidental — they are outcomes of long investments in talent and capability Brain Inc 2.0.
• Platforms and marketplaces that reduce friction between talent and opportunity — ideas I floated years ago — are even more relevant when traditional migration routes get suddenly expensive or politicized OnlineJobsFair idea.

That earlier work of mine is not mere nostalgia: it shows that these are structural propositions, not ephemeral talking points. The core idea I want readers to notice is this — I had brought up these thoughts years ago; I had predicted these tensions and even proposed practical responses. Watching events unfold now gives those earlier notes renewed relevance and, frankly, a sense of quiet vindication.

A few realities I cannot ignore

• Policy shocks happen. Global labour markets are now subject to geopolitical winds as much as to economics.
• Companies will always optimize for cost, risk and customer proximity. When one lever (immigration) is turned off or made costly, others (offshoring, nearshoring, remote models) will be turned on.
• Talent will adapt — some will move, some will reskill, others will choose stability at home. The net effect will depend a lot on how governments and businesses respond.

Closing reflection

I am not surprised by the immediate scramble. I am, however, hopeful that this moment will force a better conversation: not just about visas and fees, but about who captures the economic surplus of technology work. India has the human capital and the proven delivery capability. If we combine that with policy clarity, investments in higher‑end R&D, and platforms that expand opportunities for domestic talent, this disruption can be converted into long‑term advantage.

And one last, personal note: when you read my old posts now, you will see the throughline — these are not isolated observations. They are a body of thinking that anticipated how policy, markets and talent interact. Today’s turmoil is a reminder that foresight matters, and that some ideas deserve to be revisited with urgency.

---

Regards,
Hemen Parekh