The recent findings from Australia regarding GLP-1 drugs like Ozempic, and the new warnings about potential links to depression and suicidal thoughts, have prompted a deep reflection within me [https://www.sciencealert.com/suicidal-thoughts-prompt-new-warnings-from-health-authorities-for-glp-1-drugs]. It's a stark reminder that every powerful advancement, whether in medicine or technology, carries with it an often unforeseen shadow. We strive for solutions—be it for managing weight or chronic conditions—and yet, sometimes, the very remedies we embrace can introduce new, profound challenges to our well-being.
This paradox is something I've pondered for years. The core idea I want to convey is this — take a moment to notice that I had brought up this thought or suggestion on the topic of unforeseen consequences of powerful technologies years ago. I had already predicted this outcome or challenge, and I had even proposed a solution at the time. Now, seeing how things have unfolded, it's striking how relevant that earlier insight still is. Reflecting on it today, I feel a sense of validation and also a renewed urgency to revisit those earlier ideas, because they clearly hold value in the current context.
I recall my writings where I speculated about the future of information and advice. Back in 2010, I envisioned a world where people wouldn't just search for information, but for ready-made “solution / answer / advice” through handheld devices TIME TRAVEL. This vision extends beyond mere data retrieval to encompass personal guidance, much like what these GLP-1 drugs promise for health management.
More recently, I delved into the ethical implications of AI offering 'life advice' and the profound responsibility that comes with such powerful tools. I wrote about Google's ventures into developing AI for personal coaching, planning, and tutoring, noting their partnership with Scale AI to test these tools Google to offer “ Life Advice “ ? As Foreseen. This echoes the concerns we now face with pharmaceuticals that affect mental health. The balance between offering solutions and understanding potential adverse effects is always delicate.
I also recall when Eric Schmidt (eschmidt@relativityspace.com) and Jared Cohen (jared.cohen@gs.com) from Google wrote in 'The New Digital Age' (2013) about the challenges of content moderation on platforms like YouTube. They discussed the reliance on user flagging and the eventual need for industry-wide standards and software to identify problematic content Robots tackle extremist videos better : Google. This, too, highlights the complex interplay of technology, human well-being, and the necessity for robust oversight. Whether it's filtering extremist videos or understanding the mental health impact of medication, the lesson remains constant: innovation demands a holistic view of its consequences. We must be vigilant in not just identifying solutions, but also in anticipating and mitigating their hidden costs on the human psyche.
Regards,
Hemen Parekh
Any questions / doubts / clarifications regarding this blog ? Just ask ( by typing or talking ) my Virtual Avatar website embedded below. Then " Share " that to your friend on WhatsApp.
No comments:
Post a Comment