Context :
5L
cases pending in HCs, SC set to recall retired judges /
TNN - 26 March
Extract :
The Supreme Court on Thursday in principle
decided to resort to the never used constitutional provision for engaging retired High Court judges to tackle the huge pendency in High Courts…
Article 224A provides, “ The Chief Justice of
an HC for any state may at any time, with the previous consent of the President,
request any person, who has held the office of the judge of that court or of
any other high court to sit and act as a judge of the high court of that state “
The CJI-led bench said since the retired judges would be given a specific tenure to
adjudicate old cases and as they would be regarded as the junior-most in the
hierarchy of the HC, it would not cause any heartburn among serving judges
“ It is not that regular appointment of judges
would be stalled, slowed down or substituted by resorting to Article 224A to
tackle the pendency, which has gone beyond manageable limits. There are cases pending for 25 to 30 years in some HCs and causing all kinds of problems
in justice dispensation. Judges who
have retired after spending 15-20 years in
HCs would be eminently suitable to adjudicate old cases. Once the pendency is
dealt with, their tenure can come to an end “, the CJI said
===================================================
MY TAKE :
Ø Thank you, CJI for this is very welcome decision
Ø As against 5 lakh cases pending in High Courts, the total number pending, exceeds 300 lakhs ( 3 crore )
Ø The decision to re-appoint “ retired “ judges for OLD cases ( on specific
TENURE basis ), needs to be coupled with starting of HUNDREDS of VIRTUAL
COURTS ( e-Courts )
Ø I urge the Supreme Court – and the Governments , Central and
States – to consider suggestion made in my following e-mail :
Justice
delayed is Justice Denied …………………………….[ 12 Sept 2018 ]
Extract from this e-mail :
Ø
And as far as finding 10,000 Judges to conduct “ Online Trials “ from the
comfort of
I suggest that,
we rope in
Dhan accounts )
Judges ,depending upon the “ Actual Time “ taken to dispose off a given case
as against the “Target Time “ ( to be computed by Artificial
Intelligent Software , based on historical data being continuously compiled for
all the cases , once the portal gets launched )
Ø
I urge
Chief Justice Hon Deepak Misraji to treat this email as a PIL and “
direct “ the
Ø
Your " Activism " in this matter will go a long way to restore
the faith of the ordinary citizens in the judiciary !
===================================================
With regards,
Hemen Parekh / hcp@RcruitGuru.com / 27
March 2021