Hi Friends,

Even as I launch this today ( my 80th Birthday ), I realize that there is yet so much to say and do. There is just no time to look back, no time to wonder,"Will anyone read these pages?"

With regards,
Hemen Parekh
27 June 2013

Now as I approach my 90th birthday ( 27 June 2023 ) , I invite you to visit my Digital Avatar ( www.hemenparekh.ai ) – and continue chatting with me , even when I am no more here physically

Monday, 9 August 2021

Thank You, Shri Mahtabji

 

Thank You, Shri Mahtabji

( Shri Mahtab Bhartruhariji– Minister for Labor / bhartruhari.mahtab@gmail.com )

 

What for ?

For accepting my suggestion


What suggestion ?

To introduce an Urban Job Guarantee Scheme along the lines of MGNREGA


Where reported ?

An Urban Job Guarantee Scheme is the need of the hour / Business Line / 10 Aug 2021

( Authors : CP Chandrashekhar  / Jayati Ghosh )

Extract :

Ø  The Standing Committee on Labour stated in its report of August 3, 2021 that “there is an imperative need for putting in place an Employment Guarantee Programme for the urban workforce in line with MGNREGA.”


When did you make this suggestion ?   

2 YEARS ago, through my following e-mail request to Shri Modiji :


Ø  MGNREGA : Can it morph into UBI ? ………………….[ 11 May 2020 ]


Extract :

 

      Ø  MGNREGA should be re-named, MGNRUGA ( Mahatma Gandhi National

          Rural Urban Employment Guarantee Act )

 

     Ø  Besides RURAL households, it should cover URBAN households as well

 

     Ø  Besides “ Unskilled Manual Work “, it must also cover “ Semi-skilled / Skilled 

         work as well

 

     Ø  The daily wages payable , must be the “ Minimum Wage “ at the start of each

         Skill level grade and periodically revised upward, depending upon CPI

 

      Ø  Number of “ Guaranteed Days of Work Employment / year “ should be :

 

       #  Rural Areas ……………………….. 300 days ( up from current 100 days )

       #  Urban Areas :

               Class II towns ………………… 200 days

               Class I Cities……………………  100 days

 

      Ø  On MGNRUGA website , there will be provision for,

        #  Jobless persons to register ( providing full personal data / job locations

             preferred / Skill level / prior experience etc )

       #  Companies / Establishments to register, providing full details of vacancies

       #  Match-making / Allocation etc

 

 Ø    If an Urban establishment provides work to any of the REGISTERED

       UNEMPLOYED referred by MGNRUGA  web site, it will not be required to pay

       wages ( to those  persons ), for periods mentioned above

                

      For them, the wages will get paid directly by the Ministry subsidizing , at rates

      prescribed under the Act ( DBT ) . Any wages paid in excess , will have to be

     borne by the establishment concerned

 

      

     This “ Wage Subsidy “ will be available ONLY to those establishments, who

     install in their premises, Mobile-based Attendance System , as described at :

     

            From BAD to MAD                   [ 01 June 2016 ]

                MAD goes to Mandi                  [ 02 Jan 2020  ]

 

HOW WILL THIS HELP ?

 

Ø  This modification of Scheme will cover jobless persons, all over India – not only Rural India

 

Ø  The scheme as it stands now, covers “ works “ related only to ,

             #   Soil and Water Conservation

             #   Ground Water Recharge

             #   Irrigation

             #   Drainage

             #   Plantation

             #   Land……. Etc

 

           My suggestion will extend the scheme to cover urban offices / factories /

           shops etc, where millions have been rendered jobless due to lockdown

          

           

Ø  Current rural schemes have to be monitored by govt officers / panchayat

   office-bearers, who may lack supervision skills and / or lack “ motivation “ to

   ensure that each MGNREGA worker puts in honest / hard / productive work,

   at the end of the day !

 

        As against this, when organized / profit driven establishments ( in Urban

        setting ) are supervising such workers, productivity of “ Asset Generation “,

        will be very high !

                      

         { Read : https://myblogepage.blogspot.com/2017/11/discovering-

                      obvious.html  }

 

 

        Ø  Because of this Wage Subsidy ( better name it CORONA EMPATHY – so as

            not to run foul of WTO ) , MSME will revive faster , with less worry for Cash

            Flow . Products will become cheaper

            

 

       Ø  By providing jobs and enabling people to earn their own living , there will be

           no need for Delhi-type “ doles  “ – which are unsustainable in long run

 

           

       Ø  This ( scheme ) overcomes the major objections against UBI ( Universal

           Basic Income ), viz :

           #  How to decide whom ( defining “ poor “ is difficult ), to give UBI

           #  People will become too dependent on “ Sarkar Maa-Baap “ and become

               lazy / stop looking for work

 

      Ø  It is better than the Unemployment Allowance of USA ( now for 33 million

          persons, sitting at home )

 

 

Dear Shri Narendrabhai,

 

It is time to think about a PERMANENT SOLUTION to this problem of UN-EMPLOYMENT { even beyond COVID }

Please consider my suggestion

 

1 comment :

1.             Description: https://www.blogger.com/img/blogger_logo_round_35.png

bhuvana12 May 2020 at 01:43

Nice suggestion. Hope it gets implemented soon. The plight of labourers across the country is really pathetic.

 

==================================================

With regards,

Hemen parekh  /  hcp@RecruitGuru.com  /  10 Aug 2021


Related Readings :

Ø  Urban Poor : Existence Admitted ! …………………………….[ 21 June 2020 ]

Ø  How to Alleviate Urban Poverty ………………………………….[ 10 Sept 2020 ]

   

 

Friday, 6 August 2021

Congratulations, shri Jagdambika Palji

 

Congratulations, shri Jagdambika Palji

( Chairperson- Parliamentary Committee on Urban Development )

  [  Jagdambika.pal@sansad.nic.in / mp.jpal@yahoo.com   ]

  

What for ?

For making a very  sensible and pragmatic suggestion for solving problem of millions of jobless ( job-seeking ) youth , by enabling them to become self-employed

 

Who made that suggestion ?

Parliamentary Committee on Urban development  [ Comm.urban@snsad.nic.in ]

 

Specifically What suggestion ?

Read following news in today’s Times of India :

Explore revising ceiling on vendor number, urban ministry told    


Extract :

Ø  A parliamentary panel has recommended the Housing and Urban Affairs Ministry to explore the possibility of revisiting the ceiling on the number of Street vendors, which is currently 2.5 % of the population of the city, town, zone or ward

Ø  It has said this ceiling is “ grossly inadequate “ in thickly populated cities such as Delhi and Mumbai

 

Ø  The Standing Committee on Urban Development has observed that even after seven years of enactment of law to protect the livelihood of Street Vendors, several states had not taken steps essential for implementation of the Central Legislation like carrying out VENDOR SURVEYS and forming TOWN VENDING COMMITTEES

 

 

Ø  The report comes at a time when the Centre has rolled out a scheme for subsidized loans of Rs 10,000 to Street Vendors

 

Ø  As of July 30, 43.3 lakh vendors had applied for the loan and 25.3 lakh of these applications had been sanctioned

 

 Banks had disbursed loans to 22.8 lakh Street Vendors

=============================================

   Thank You, Shri Jagdambika Palji,


For considering – and endorsing – my suggestion to allow / permit / enable / empower, ANYONE / ANYEHERE, to become a Street Vendor ( ie: essentially, to become SELF-EMPLOYED )

Especially when :

Ø  Millions of millions of young and old, are already jobless ( more so after the pandemic )

Ø  Every year , country is adding 12 million to its “ Army of Unemployed

Ø  Neither the Public Sector, nor the Private sector is in a position to create so many “ Paid Jobs

Over the past few months, I have sent following E-mails to our Cabinet Minister / MPs / MLAs / State Chief Ministers / NITI Aayog etc :

Ø  RBI : Do not Nudge : Shove ………………………………………….[ 14 June 2021 ]

 

Extract :

Dear RBI,

Thank you for giving this NUDGE to PSBs ( Public Sector Banks ) . I hope PSBs will act upon your advice expeditiously . That is good nudge

But, you can give ( this scheme ) a powerful SHOVE , by urging the Central Govt to enlarge / expand,  the ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA 

For a long time, I have been pleading with the Govt ( read my following e-mails ) to ,

>  Not restrict the scheme ONLY to those persons who are ( currently ) or were

   ( in the past ), Street Vendors or who have been SURVEYED

    

I have advocated that the Scheme should be open to ANYONE who may not be eligible as per above criteria but who just WANTS to become SELF – EMPLOYED STREET VENDOR


Dear Shri Narendrabhai,


Ø  I request your PERSONAL INTERVENTION in changing the Eligibility Criteria for Street Vendor Scheme

 

My earlier E Mails on the subject :

Ø           Street Vendor Loan Scheme ……………………………………..[ 14 May 2020 ]

Ø  Thank You, Shri Hardeep Singh Puriji ………………………..[ 01 June 2020 ]

Ø  Providing Jobs : a Fundamental Right ? ……………………..[ 07 June 2020 ]

Ø  Congratulations , Shri Mahesh Kumarji ……………………..[ 20 June 2020 ]

Ø  God appears as Roti …………………………………………………….[ 30 June 2020 ]

Ø  Street Vendors : How to Organize ?..........................[ 21 July 2020 ]

Ø  Fresher need not apply ? ……………………………………………..[ 09 Sept 2020 ]

 

      The above-listed 7 e-mails contain my suggestions, specific to the STREET

      VENDOR SCHEME


      That is only ONE method to address the problem of Un-Employment


      For a number of OTHER METHODS, please consider suggestions in following

      64 e-mails, sent over the past TEN YEARS :

      

Ø  Summary of E-Mails to Cabinet Ministers > SELF EMPLOYMENT ……………..[ 10 Mar 2021 ]

 

With  regards,

Hemen Parekh  /  hcp@RecruitGuru.com  /  06 Aug 2021

=============================================

Copy of this email being sent to following State-level Urban Development Secretaries :