Hi Friends,

Even as I launch this today ( my 80th Birthday ), I realize that there is yet so much to say and do. There is just no time to look back, no time to wonder,"Will anyone read these pages?"

With regards,
Hemen Parekh
27 June 2013

Now as I approach my 90th birthday ( 27 June 2023 ) , I invite you to visit my Digital Avatar ( www.hemenparekh.ai ) – and continue chatting with me , even when I am no more here physically

Sunday, 17 April 2011

Bribe Taker or Bribe Giver or Both ?


On its website and in print, Times of India [ April 17,2011 ] mentions a working paper by Kaushik Basu, Chief Economic Adviser to the Government of India, in which he is supposed to have suggested that that those who pay bribes should not be penalized because they would then be encouraged to report the crime after they have committed it. This will make the bribe receiver too scared to ask for it. This, he claims, could substantially bring down everyday corruption.


"It is being argued is that this entire punishment (for the act of corruption) should be heaped on the bribe taker and the bribe giver should not be penalized at all, at least not for the act of offering or giving the bribe," he suggested.

On the face of it, this looks like a good suggestion provided the Lokpal Bill provides for the following :

Ø  Bribe should have been given only for getting a service that was legally due to the bribe-giver and was being denied

Ø  Onus of proving [ that a bribe was given / accepted ], must lie with the bribe-giver

Ø  Complaint must be specific and provide details in respect of a claimed incidence of bribing

Ø  If it turns out that the complaint was  false / mischievous / malicious and cannot be proved, then the Lokpal Act must provide for severe punishment to the complainant – in order to deter harassment of honest officials

I hope, Drafting Committee will thoroughly consider all aspects.

With regards

hemen  parekh

No comments:

Post a Comment