On GDP in 2025: Uneven Growth, Old Warnings, and a Renewed Urgency

I have been steeped in data for as long as I can remember. Looking across the most recent releases — the ONS bulletins for the UK, FRED series for the United States, OECD and IMF tables, and global forecasts from specialist providers — a pattern emerges that is at once familiar and unsettling: moderate growth, unequal across places and sectors, and vulnerable to policy and geopolitical shocks.

I raised this cluster of concerns years ago — the fragility of growth amid trade uncertainty and the limits of headline GDP as a measure of well‑being. Seeing the same dynamics play out in 2025 feels like validation of that earlier thinking, and it renews the urgency with which I revisit those old proposals.

What the numbers are telling me

• The global picture in 2025 is one of moderate but uneven expansion. Forecasts and country readings point to a resilient US, a sluggish Euro Area, modest UK growth, and continued deceleration from the highs of the early post‑pandemic rebound in many places. The FocusEconomics dataset shows country‑by‑country GDP growth patterns and forecasts that reflect this patchwork reality Economic Growth (GDP, annual variation in %) | FocusEconomics.

• For the UK, the ONS reports growth of 0.3% in Q2 2025 (down from 0.7% in Q1) and underlines services and construction strength alongside a softer production sector GDP first quarterly estimate, UK: April to June 2025 | ONS and GDP monthly estimate, UK: June 2025 | ONS. The BBC’s plainspoken summary of these official figures helps translate them for everyday consequences How fast is the UK's economy growing and what is GDP? | BBC.

• The Euro Area’s Q2 2025 growth has been sluggish (roughly 0.1–0.7% depending on the slice and source), and cross‑country variation — France growing, Germany contracting — is evident in OECD and UK parliamentary analyses OECD Data Explorer and GDP international comparisons: Economic indicators | House of Commons Library.

• China continues to show solid, though slower, growth relative to the last decade, and many EMs show very divergent paths — some high growth, others still struggling — which FocusEconomics captures in its cross‑country matrix FocusEconomics dataset.

• Inflation and price dynamics remain central. The GDP implicit price deflator and similar deflators signal that inflationary pressures are still with us in many economies, complicating the real-growth picture (see FRED’s GDP deflator series) Gross Domestic Product: Implicit Price Deflator (GDPDEF) | FRED.

Key challenges in plain view

• Trade policy uncertainty and tariffs are no longer a theoretical risk — they are a present drag on confidence and investment. The IMF and OECD have repeatedly adjusted outlooks in response to rising trade frictions; the Commons Library briefing summarizes these risks succinctly GDP international comparisons: Economic indicators | House of Commons Library.

• Growth remains uneven across sectors. Services are generally outperforming manufacturing in multiple advanced economies, a dynamic the ONS has documented in its breakdowns and which shows up in national accounts low‑level aggregates GDP output approach – low‑level aggregates | ONS.

• Labor markets, while resilient in many places, mask inequality and differing regional outcomes. Real GDP per capita measures give a clearer sense of household‑level welfare than headline GDP alone; FRED’s per‑capita series is useful here Real gross domestic product per capita | FRED.

• Policy tightening by central banks, even as some inflation softens, keeps a tightrope of trade‑offs in play: higher rates tamp inflation but raise the risk of slower investment and weaker demand.

Why the past warnings matter now

I have repeatedly flagged — over several years — that headline GDP could obscure distributional and sustainability issues, and that geopolitical trade shocks would echo through investment, supply chains and confidence. I said then what I say now: we must not mistake headline growth for healthy, inclusive progress.

Hearing the same warnings echoed by institutions now is not cause for complacency but for urgency. I had brought up these thoughts years ago, proposed complementary indicators and structural reforms, and seeing them vindicated today deepens my conviction that we should revisit those earlier proposals with a renewed sense of purpose.

Where my mind settles on policy and purpose

• Short‑term policy must remain nimble: central banks and fiscal authorities should guard price stability without crushing the nascent pockets of demand that keep employment and incomes steady. The IMF and OECD scenarios captured in official briefings help frame those trade‑offs [IMF World Economic Outlook update; OECD Economic Outlook summarized in Commons Library](IMF World Economic Outlook, OECD Economic Outlook).

• Medium‑term work requires structural reforms to lift potential growth: skills and labour market reforms, investment in productivity‑enhancing infrastructure, and competition‑friendly regulation. I had argued for many of these reforms years ago; that argument feels more relevant today than ever.

• Measure what matters: broaden the dashboard beyond GDP. Real GDP per capita, price deflators, regional GVA, and wellbeing indicators should all inform policy. The ONS and other agencies now routinely publish these complements, which makes better policy possible ONS GDP pages and datasets.

A final, reflective point

Data can delight and dismay in equal measure. The charts, tables and forecasts tell a story of resilience and fragility at once. My recurring thought — which I’ve voiced before and feel compelled to repeat now — is this: I raised these issues years ago and proposed remedies; the present moment vindicates that vigilance and urges action. That validation is not a moment for vanity, but for accelerated effort.

We are navigating a complex economic terrain in 2025: uneven growth, persistent risks from trade and inflation, and widening regional disparities. The answer is neither a single policy nor a single metric. It is a sustained, multi‑pronged effort: better measurement, targeted reform, prudent macro policy, and above all a willingness to act on precautions once dismissed as hindsight.

---

Regards,
Hemen Parekh