Economic Times ( 18 Dec )
carries following news report :
“ Ex-PMO Official Deposition Sealed
Ex-Coal Secy’s Fate “
In the coal scam case , CBI court awarded 3 year sentence to ex
coal secretary , H C Gupta
, saying :
·
He actively , deliberately
and consciously , concealed facts from
the then Prime Minister
·
Neither was it alleged by the
prosecution nor any such evidence was available to show that Gupta obtained
allocation of a coal block for the accused company by any corrupt or illegal
means
·
Prosecution is required to prove only that in order to obtain
either for himself or for any other person , any valuable thing or pecuniary
advantage , the public servant abused his position
{
Astute readers would find subtle similarities in the observations made
by the CBI Court this afternoon , in its 1582 page verdict , acquitting all
accused in the 2011 , 2G
Scam ! }
While
pressing for a lenient sentence, Gupta said that as per the prosecution case
itself , there has been no allegation against him of any nature whatsoever that
any financial gain was obtained by him
The news report carries quotes from Anil
Swarup ( HRD Secretary ) and Parmeshwaran Iyer ( Sanitation Secretary ) ,
talking highly about Gupta being an honest officer
Earlier Amitabh Kant ( CEO – NITI Aayog )
had voiced similar sentiments about Shri Gupta
All this is “
water under the bridge “ !
Irreversible !
But , if the government wants to encourage honest officers to take “ Bold / Out of
the Box “ policy decisions, without being afraid of “ getting their necks chopped off “ , then it
should waste no further time to implement my following suggestion :
( - and without waiting
for the Government to advise them , what is holding up Central IAS Officers Association , to initiate this,
on their own ? )
Friday, 20 June 2014
To forgive is divine ( provided it
was a honest error
)
All of us keep making errors , all the time
But rarely same " mistake "
twice
Often , decisions taken at
a point of time , turn out to be " poor " , with passage of time
Reasons
are simple :
* We never have all the
information - relevant to the problem we are trying to solve –
available with us , at the
time of taking a decision
* Even when most of such relevant info is available , we may not have the capacity /
competence to " process " such
info
* As humans , we have our biases / prejudices , based on
our previous experiences ,
which influence our decisions
* Quite often , and often against our own better evaluation / judgement of
a given
situation , we are wrongly influenced by our peers / bosses /
subordinates or even
voters - all of whom have different
expectations / vested interests !
* Additional - and more relevant -
information surfaces , AFTER
we have taken a
decision ( happens all the time
! )
To encourage Babus and Ministers to
take FAST decisions , Shri Narendra Modi must insist that they carefully " Record " on the
files :
* What info / data he wished was available
for a better decision
* What
different " views / opinions " were presented to him for
consideration
* What " Data / Views " he would
have obtained if he had more time
* Who all ,
the decision might offend
* What is the
likely " Cost " of postponing that decision
And finally a declaration :
* This decision is not likely to benefit any of my near relatives /
friends , directly or
immediately
After all of this , if the
decision appears to be " Wrong " in hindsight , it must be "
forgiven " and treated as an honest error
To
err is human !
21 Dec 2017
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Added on 29 March 2026 :
Extract :
A special court on Friday (March 27, 2026) acquitted former MP Vijay Darda, his son Devendra Darda and former coal secretary H.C. Gupta in a case related to coal block allocation after finding no evidence to support the charges of cheating, criminal conspiracy or misconduct.
The CBI registered more than 50 cases regarding the alleged coal scam.
According to the prosecution, AMR Iron and Steel Private Limited, in conspiracy with Gupta, submitted false information in its application to the Union Ministry of Coal to secure allocation of the coal block.
The court, however, rejected CBI’s allegations. According to the evidence before it, the relevant information was already available to authorities during the allocation process, and no witness corroborated claims of inducement or deception, it said.
According to the court, the prosecution failed to prove charges of cheating and criminal conspiracy. After examining the evidence and testimonies, the court found no evidence to support these allegations.
It emerged during the trial that there was no evidence to establish any false or dishonest intent in the company’s application or feedback form. Records showed that all relevant information was already available with authorities during the allocation process, and no witness corroborated claims of inducement or deception, the judgement said.
The court also noted that the alleged ₹24.6 crore transactions were not substantiated, and no link was established between the payments, the coal block allocation, or the letters written by Vijay Darda.
Additionally, there was no evidence to suggest that the letters influenced the allocation decision, it said.
The detailed judgement is awaited.
No comments:
Post a Comment