Hi Friends,

Even as I launch this today ( my 80th Birthday ), I realize that there is yet so much to say and do. There is just no time to look back, no time to wonder,"Will anyone read these pages?"

With regards,
Hemen Parekh
27 June 2013

Now as I approach my 90th birthday ( 27 June 2023 ) , I invite you to visit my Digital Avatar ( www.hemenparekh.ai ) – and continue chatting with me , even when I am no more here physically

Thursday, 9 March 2017

Not a day too soon !



Hindustan Times ( 10 March 2017 ) carries following news report :


“ NTPC likely to enter electric vehicle sector “


Enthused by India’s electric vehicle ( EV ) market potential, state-owned energy company NTPC Ltd is exploring a new business around it


To start with, India’s largest power generation utility is looking at setting up charging stations to help create the demand for electricity generated by its plants and keep pace with the fast changing power sector


Said a government official :


“ The interests of a lot of companies in the Public Sector is aligned with the possibilities offered by India’s electric vehicle market . A case in point being NTPC Ltd, which has surplus power and is now looking at this market to set up charging stations . This offers a very strong complementary area for NTPC “



Said a NTPC spokesman :


“ Electric Vehicle charging infrastructure is set to be explored as an emerging requirement . The State owned utility is working on a plan to bring down the cost of setting up these charging stations by half to around Rs ONE LAKH each “





While congratulating NTPC strategy-planners on this initiative , I request them to remember what marketing Guru , Ted Levitt said , some 40 years ago , in his famous essay , “ Marketing Myopia


He said :

If you don’t make yourself obsolete , then someone else will

Continuously ask yourself : What business are we in ?

American Railroads thought they were in the “ Railroad Business “


They did not realize that they were , really in the business of “ transporting people “ !


But hundreds of Car Manufacturers did not think that they were in the business of  “ Manufacture of Cars “


They said : We are in the business of “ transporting people “


So they made the American Railroads , obsolete !



It is high time NTPC asks itself :


Are we in the business of “ Coal Power Plants “ ? or , are we in the business of “ Generating Electricity “ ?



Why is asking this question so critical for NTPC ?


Shri Pratim Ranjan Bose explains this in his article ( Dark Side of the shift to Renewables ) which appeared in Business Line ( 13 Feb 2017 ) . He writes :


·         
The CEA’s ( Central Electricity Authority ) exhaustive plan document pointed out that average PLF ( Plant Load Factor or availability ) of coal-fired plants declined from 78 per cent to 62 per cent  between 2009-10 and 2015-16


·         In November 2016, the PLF had gone down further to 61 per cent


·         This is against the declared goal of of the Electricity Policy 2005 , to increase PLF to 85 per cent



·         The PLF of the private sector – which took a lead role in capacity addition – is dangerously close to the techno-economic viability threshold


·         With 50 GW “ under construction coal fired plants “ expected to come on stream in next 5 years, the CEA did a range of sensitivity analyses ….. a mere 15 % RE share in generation can bring down the PLF of coal-fired plants to 53 per cent in 2022 . Higher RE capacity addition can reduce the PLF to as low as 48 per cent !


·         ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Now relate this to what Debjoy Sengupta writes in a report in Economic Times ( 10 March 2017 ) , as follows :


·         Solar power costs had hit a low of Rs 3.3 per unit last month , which is equal to average generation tariffs of NTPC , which produces bulk of its power from coal


·         NTPC’s lowest cost of generation from one of its old plant is around Rs 1.8 per unit { My Note : The latest Solar Plant installed a few weeks back in MASDAR city – UAE – supplies power at Rs 1.8 per unit ! }


·         In February , solar tariffs in the country touched a low of Rs 2.97 per unit for the first year of generation and an average tariff of Rs 3.3  per unit


Then , in Economic Times ( 15 Feb ) Debjoy writes ( Clean Energy Cess Collections Rise , but spending Low ) :


·         The government’s collection from the clean environment cess imposed on coal ( Rs 400 per ton ), lignite and peat ( in 2010 ) , are likely to touch Rs 54,336 crore by March


·         However only Rs 9021 crore ( or about 17 % ) , has been spent through the National Clean Energy Fund


·         The spending falls short of the estimated Rs 34,822 crore needed to subsidize some 55 renewable energy projects


·         -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

An editorial ( Getting the Solar Power Goal on Track ) in Economic Times ( 15 Feb ) , reads :


·         The proposal to feed about 7,000 railway stations with Solar Power could go a long way in meeting if not exceeding, the national goal to have 100 GW of functional solar generation capacity by 2022


·         If the Railways can gainfully leverage land and building space for, say, 20 MW of Solar capacity in each of the 7,000 stations, it would greatly increase green, renewable power nationally ( - 140 GW as against 2022 target of 100 GW ! )


·         -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I suppose NTPC strategy planners have read the following in MINT ( 06 March 2017 ) :


“ How the World’s largest Solar Park is shaping up in Karnataka “

·         The aim is to generate around 2,700 MW from the Pavagada solar park by the end of 2018 , spread over an area of 13,000 acres


·         The first phase capacity of 500 MW has been bid out and generation is expected to start in the next 4 months



·         Bundled tariff range from Rs 3.5 and Rs 4.5 per unit



To make matters worse ( for NTPC ) , M Ramesh explains to us in Business Line ( 11 Feb 2017 ) – “ How Solar Power was made cheap “ :


·         Experts calculate that a tariff of Rs 2.97 would be based on an assumption of that  modules could be purchased for 25 US cents. To day, the cheapest modules are quoted around 30 cents


·         The REWA tender was superbly structured. For instance, if the commissioning of the project gets delayed because of delays in approvals, the developer gets paid for  “ deemed generation “


·         The tender also promises that the grid will not be shut for over 50 hours in a year, or the developer gets paid again for “ deemed generation “


·         The tariff escalation for 15 years and explicit state guarantee for payments sweetened the tender


·          

And now to complete the perspective , DNA ( 11 March 2017 ) carries a news report which reads :


“ 100 days nahi toh free , Musk ka vaada “


South Australia has been going through a power crisis that has resulted in load shedding in several parts of the region.

Australia has been phasing out COAL POWER PLANTS to reduce POLLUTION LEVELS.

The power cuts have however, not gone down well with most Australians
Elon Musk , the billionaire founder of electric car giant TESLA has thrown a challenge to the Australian Federal Government , saying he can solve the State’s energy woes within 100 DAYS – or he will deliver the 100 MW BATTERY STORAGE SYSTEM for free !


   
·          
WHAT  DOES  FUTURE  HOLD  ?

·         With continuously dropping prices of solar PV modules from China , per unit cost of solar power could well touch Rs 1.5 in 2018 and Rs 1.0 in 2022


With Chinese exports falling dramatically , expect PV module prices to drop to 20 US cents by 2018 !


·         Transmission costs , by themselves are more than this !


·         With large consumers switching over to Solar power , demand for NTPC’s coal generated power will continue to fall – leading to PLF of 48 % by 2020 !


·         Should NTPC continue to operate its plants at such a low PLF , it will incur huge losses !


·         Government does not want to “ subsidize “ coal based plants . If anything , it wants to “ penalize “ such plants


·         NTPC will not be able to supply to “ Electric Vehicle Charging Stations “ , power from its “ Coal based power plants “ , which can compete with power from Solar power plants ! Hence , this strategy to expand its customer base is hopeless !



HOW  SHOULD  NTPC  RE-INVENT  ITSELF  ?


·         Convert its coal based power plants into Solar Power Parks ( plenty of space )


·         Set up a joint venture with TESLA to manufacture in India , Powerwall and Powerpack storage batteries – the missing links in our Solar Chain Strategy



This will enable NTPC to operate all of its coal based power plants ( till these get permanently shut down ) , at 80 per cent PLF ( half the plants during daytime and half during the night ) . Powerpack Battery Storage installations in different parts of the country will even out the peak and the lean demand cycles


These very same Powerpack Storage Installations will also cater to those 34 + 50 Solar Parks being set up – and also provide Solar Power to those Charging Stations


For details , read :

Welcome ,Elon Musk !  ( 11 Feb 2017 )





·         Change its name from NTPC to NCEC ( National Clean Energy Corporation ) – in order to accurately reflect : “ What business are we in ? “



·         Adopt for itself , following CORPORATE MISSION :


“ To save the lives of 600,000 Indians who die prematurely , every year , due to emission of green house gases and particulate matter , produced by coal fired power plants



11  March  2017


World Government ? Let us begin with a World Military



Leading News papers ( 10 March 2017 ) carries following news report :




“ World govt may save humanity from doom


LONDON: The aggressive instincts of humans, coupled with the fast pace of growth in technology may destroy us all by nuclear or biological war, renowned British physicist Stephen Hawking has warned, adding that only a 'world government' may prevent this impending doom.

Despite the problems of mass species extinction, global warming and the threat of artificial intelligence, Hawking remains optimistic about the future of humanity. He said that he looked back on his life with gratitude and towards the years to come with cautious hope.

However, he is worried that humans may not have the skills as a species to stay alive. If humanity is to survive to see the future, then we might need to form a world government, Hawking said.

"We need to be quicker to identify such threats and act before they get out of control. This might mean some form of world government. But that might become a tyranny," said Hawking.

"All this may sound a bit doom-laden but I am an optimist. I think the human race will rise to meet these challenges," he said.

"Since civilisation began, aggression has been useful in as much as it has definite survival advantages," he said. "It is hard-wired into our genes by Darwinian evolution. Now, however, technology has advanced at such a pace that this aggression may destroy us all by nuclear or biological war," he added.

"We need to control this inherited instinct by our logic and reason," Hawking was quoted as saying by 'The Times'. He argued that there were new challenges too - among them environmental problems and his concern that artificial intelligence could supplant humans. Hawking had earlier warned that the creation of powerful artificial intelligence may turn out to be "the worst thing ever to happen to humanity" despite its potential benefits.



This raises the question :

Despite possessing the basic frame work of a “ World Government “ , why has 71 year old United Nations , repeatedly failed to enforce its dozens of “ Resolutions “ in curbing / controlling terrorism , around the World ?

My following earlier blog may provide an answer :




17  Nov  2015

From Inter-Pol to Inter-Mil ?


Over the past 100 years, countries of the World have instituted quite a few organizations to deal with international issues . These include :


*    United Nations ( earlier, League of Nations ) and its various arms

*    World Bank

*    International Monetary Fund  (  IMF  )

*    World Trade Organization  ( WTO - earlier , UNCTAD )

*    International Court of Justice - Hague

*    Atomic Inspection Agency

*    Environment Protection Agency

and ,

*   International Police ( Inter-Pol )


During the past decade, the World is facing another major international threat to civilization


It is " Terrorism "


" Terrorism " is characterized as follows :

*     Distinct from

       #     Internal conflicts / civil wars , within a nation's boundaries

       #     Localized commotions / disobedience / militancy , within a country

       #     Breakdown of " Law and Order " situations , inside a country

       #     Country's citizens trying to overthrow an oppressive dictatorship / 
              military rule

*    Spread across international borders

*    Unrelated to any geographical / territorial disputes between countries

*    Hiding under fundamentalist ideologies that disregard human rights

*    Trying to overthrow democratically elected legitimate popular governments

*    Killing innocent citizens

*    Poisoning the minds of Youth with hatred for certain peace-loving / non-             violent religions or philosophies
      
*    Recruiting children / women as shields against reprisals by legitimate
      authorities

*    Glorifying suicidal attacks while bombing peaceful gathering of people

*    Aided and abated by black money / arms , from sympathizers everywhere


Of course , this is not a comprehensive definition of " Terrorism " , but it is good enough for UN to adopt it right away

And it is high time , UN forms, along the lines of Inter-Pol ,

Inter- Mil  ( International Military )

And lay down clear and unambiguous rules under which :

*   Any country affected by terrorism, can seek intervention / help from Inter-Mil ,

OR

*   UN itself may take suo moto cognizance of such terrorism anywhere in the World

 And

     not only confined to the territory of a Member Country ) , and act on its own
     to press Inter-Mil into service , to eliminate terrorists and their supporters


    SUCH UNILATERAL ACTION ON PART OF THE SECURITY COUNCIL , WILL NOT REQUIRE ANY " INVITATION /
    PERMISSION " FROM COUNTRIES AFFECTED , NOR CAN SUCH SECURITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION BE VETOED


I request the readers to " Like / Share / Re-tweet / Forward " this message to policy-makers / opinion-makers , all over the World


10  March  2017



Wednesday, 8 March 2017

Need for a Relook ?



Economic Times ( 09 March 2017 ) carries following news report :



Centre to Pay Rent for Poor in 100 Cities


The government would launch the new rental housing policy with the rental vouchers for below poverty line ( BPL ) families


Aimed directly at the URBAN POOR and helping the MIGRANT POPULATION, the scheme would involve :


·         Distribution of Rent Vouchers by URBAN LOCAL BODIES


·         The TENANT would give these vouchers to the LANDOWNER


·         In turn, the LANDOWNER would be able to redeem them at any CITIZEN SERVICE BUREAU


·         If the rent is higher than the value of the rent voucher, the tenant would pay the difference in CASH to the landowner


·         The VALUE of the rent voucher would be determined by the URBAN LOCAL BODY ( Municipal Corporation ? ), on the basis of CLASS or SIZE of the dwelling unit and the PREVALENT RENT in the city


A senior official of “ HOUSING AND URBAN POVERTY ALLEVIATION MINISTRY “ told ET :


“ The Rental Voucher Scheme is being looked at as a means to complement the Prime Minister’s Housing for All Scheme “

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Following are the reasons why the proposed scheme needs a relook :


NUMBER OF AGENCIES INVOLVED in IMPLEMENTATION :

·         The Ministry concerned

·         Urban Local Bodies ( Municipal Corporations of 100 Smart Cities )

·         Citizen Service Bureaus ( - also 100 ? )

·         Landowners ( Lakhs ? )

·         Voucher Recipients  ( 35 % of Urban Household who live in rented homes )



    SCOPE FOR CORRUPTION :

     There will be a lot of ambiguity / discretion , ( leading to corruption ) while deciding :


·         CLASS / SIZE of dwelling units ( city area wise )


·         Prevalent Rents ( in each area of each of those 100 cities )


·         Who is “ Below Poverty Line “ ?


·         Who is a “ MIGRANT “ resident – and for how long ? Who will certify ? In a city like Mumbai , some 500 families arrive DAILY from all over India , to make Mumbai , their new home !


·         Who will “ check and certify “ that the claimant ( voucher recipient ) is actually living at the dwelling unit declared ? How much grease money will they demand ?




·         Landowners will simply be unable to “ redeem “ those Rent Vouchers without bribing the concerned persons at the CITIZEN SERVICE BUREAU !


·         Unscrupulous nexus between TENANT and LANDOWNER could give rise to BENAMI users ( those ABOVE official Poverty Line ) – as currently RAMPANT in most houses ( flats ) sold by State Housing Corporations , all over India !



And finally ,


·         WHO will determine ( - and HOW ? ) , that XYZ tenant , who was POOR last year , has come up ABOVE the Poverty Line , this year – and become ineligible ?

Will this ( scheme ) not “ incentivize “ a person to want to continue to remain below Poverty Line , for as long as he can ?



·         Why should the scheme ignore RURAL POOR ?



Dear Shri Venkiah Naidu-ji :


I urge you to take a close  RELOOK  at this scheme , before announcing !


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

09  March  2017


www.hemenparekh.in / blogs