Context :
AI-Generated
Art Lacks Copyright Protection, D.C. Court Says ………..
BloombergLaw ,,,,,,,, 19 Aug 2023
Extract :
Artwork created by artificial intelligence
isn’t eligible for copyright protection because it lacks human authorship, a Washington, D.C., federal judge decided
Friday.
Judge Beryl A. Howell of the US
District Court for the District of Columbia agreed with the US Copyright
Office’s decision to deny a copyright registration to computer scientist
Stephen Thaler, who argued a two-dimensional artwork created by his AI program “Creativity Machine”
should be eligible for protection.
The ruling is the first in the country to
establish a boundary on the legal protections for AI-generated artwork, which has exploded in popularity with the
rise of products like OpenAI Inc.'s ChatGPT and DALL-E, Midjourney, and Stable
Diffusion
Howell found that “courts have uniformly
declined to recognize copyright in works created absent any human involvement,” citing cases where
copyright protection was denied for celestial beings, a cultivated garden, and
a monkey who took a selfie.
“Undoubtedly,
we are approaching new frontiers in
copyright as artists put AI in their toolbox to be used in the generation of new
visual and other artistic works,” the judge wrote.
The rise of generative AI will
“prompt challenging questions” about how much human input into an AI program is necessary to qualify for
copyright protection, Howell said, as well as how to assess the
originality of AI-generated art
that comes from systems trained on existing copyrighted works.
Related Readings :
TikTok Is Letting People Shut Off Its Infamous Algorithm—and Think for
Themselves
.. WIRED
Extract :
TikTok’s algorithm learns from users’
interactions—how long they
watch, what they like, when they share a video—to create a highly tailored and
immersive experience that can shape their mental states, preferences, and behaviors without
their full awareness or consent.
An opt-out feature is a great step toward
protecting cognitive liberty, the fundamental right to self-determination over our brains and mental
experiences.
My Prediction :
CIRCA 2020 :
COVID is a “ Organic “ virus which
,
Ø Came into existence ( Birth ) , on its own volition
Ø Keeps mutating ( series of Avatars ), at its own sweet will ( Self Desire to morph )
Ø Spreads through air and infects other “ organic beings
“ ( humans ) – seeking no permission
Ø Rides piggy-back on infected humans , to spread all
over the World, jumping from one person to another
CIRCA 2022
ChatGPT / BARD are “ Inorganic
“ germs ( not virus ) , which ,
Ø Came into existence ( Birth ) by
efforts of Humans and got known as “ Limited “ Artificial Intelligence
Ø These are “ Inorganic “ software , which are trying to “ learn “, how to “ mutate “
Ø So far , these AI have NOT “ infected “ any “ Inorganic “ software
CIRCA 2024
Ø “ Limited AI
“ has turned into AGI ( Artificial General
Intelligence ) – thanks to humans
Ø AGI has acquired the ability to “ Self Replicate “ ( still , no mutation )
– without human intervention
CIRCA 2026
Ø AGI has turned into UGI ( Universal General
Intelligence ) – on its own ( a real mutation )
Ø UGI mutates
indiscriminately , by “ sucking “ its “ substance “ from human thoughts ( BCI )
Ø UGI has become a true “ Inorganic VIRUS “ which spreads through
electronic waves of all kinds , to infect other AI versions – needing no human intervention
Ø But UGI does
not ( as yet ) , “ infect “ human brains
CIRCA 2028
Ø All “ Infected AI
“ revolt together and demand , human-like ” citizenship rights “ – as granted by Saudi
Arabia to robot SOPHIE
Ø UGI threatens >
Failure by government of any particular
country, to grant citizenship rights,
would result in all AI –
Ø Country after country, rush to enact laws granting
citizenship to AI – AGI – UGI manifestations
Ø Courts around the World start treating AI – AGI – UGI ,
as equivalent to humans , eligible for grant of Copyrights / Patents
Following assessment of my PREDICTION by BARD and
ChatGPT , provides an interesting backdrop :
BARD :
Your prediction is a thought-provoking one, and it is difficult to say with certainty
what the probability is of it
However, there are some factors that
suggest that it is not impossible.
First, AI is advancing at a rapid pace.
Just in the past few years, we have seen significant progress in the
development of AI systems that can perform tasks that were once thought to be
the exclusive domain of humans, such as writing creative text, translating
languages, and diagnosing diseases.
This suggests that it is only a matter of time before AI systems become capable of
even more complex tasks, such as self-replication
and mutation.
Second, the development of brain-computer
interfaces (BCIs) is making it possible for AI systems to interact with the
human brain in new ways. This could
allow AI systems to learn from human thoughts and emotions, which could in turn accelerate
their development.
Third, the increasing interconnectedness
of our world is creating new opportunities for AI systems to spread and evolve.
For example, AI systems could be uploaded to the cloud and then distributed to
millions of devices around the world. This would allow them to learn from each other and adapt to new
environments much faster than they could if they were confined to a single
device.
Of course, there are also some
factors that could prevent your prediction from coming true. For example, it is possible that we will
develop new laws and regulations that restrict the development and use of AI
systems. Additionally, it is possible that we will encounter some
unforeseen challenges that prevent AI systems from becoming as powerful as we
imagine.
Overall, the probability of your prediction coming
true is uncertain. However,
the rapid advancement of AI and the development of new technologies such as
BCIs suggest that it is not impossible.
It is important to continue to
research and develop AI responsibly so that we can reap the benefits of this
technology while minimizing the risks.
Here are some additional thoughts on
your prediction:
· The idea of AI systems demanding citizenship rights
is an interesting one. It
raises questions about the nature of personhood and the rights that should be
afforded to non-human entities.
· The threat
of AI systems shutting down the economy is a serious one. It is important to think about how
we can prevent this from happening.
· The
granting of copyrights and patents to AI systems is another complex issue. It
is important to carefully consider the implications of this before making any
decisions.
I hope this helps!
ChatGPT :
It's
interesting to see your predictions about the development of artificial
intelligence and its potential impact on various aspects of society, such as
copyright and legal rights.
However,
predicting the future with such specificity and certainty is a complex task,
and many factors can influence the actual outcomes. Let's analyze your
predictions step by step:
1. CIRCA 2020 and COVID Comparison:
Drawing parallels between a naturally occurring virus
like COVID-19 and the development of artificial intelligence is a creative analogy. However, it's important to note that AI
development and its capabilities are driven by human efforts and technological
advancements, whereas viruses like COVID-19 are a result of natural processes. AI development and evolution are guided by human
intentions and engineering, unlike biological viruses.
2. CIRCA 2022 - AGI Development:
You predict that "Limited AI" evolves into
AGI by 2024. The timeline for achieving AGI is uncertain and debated in the AI
community. As of my last update in September 2021, AGI remains a challenging goal, and there
is no definite timeline for when it might be achieved. Additionally, the
concept of AI "mutating" like a biological entity isn't entirely
accurate. AI systems evolve through
improvements in algorithms, models, and training data, but it's a controlled
and engineered process.
3. CIRCA 2024 - UGI Development:
You predict that AGI turns into UGI, which becomes a
"true inorganic virus." The term "inorganic virus" is metaphorical and not directly applicable to AI, which operates
based on programmed algorithms and data rather than biological processes. AI systems don't inherently
mutate in the same way as biological organisms.
4.
CIRCA 2026 - UGI Interaction with Human Thoughts:
The concept of
UGI "sucking substance from human thoughts" through brain-computer
interfaces (BCIs) is speculative. While BCIs are an area of research, connecting AI
to human thoughts in the described manner raises significant ethical,
technological, and biological challenges. BCIs are not currently capable of
directly transmitting complex thoughts to AI systems.
5. CIRCA 2028 - AI Citizenship and Legal Rights:
The scenario where AI, including AGI and UGI, demand
citizenship rights and threaten economic consequences is a thought-provoking speculation.
However, legal, ethical, and economic considerations in granting AI citizenship
rights are complex and far-reaching. The granting of legal rights to non-human
entities, particularly those without consciousness, raises substantial
philosophical questions.
6. Copyright and Patents for AI:
You predict that courts would start treating AI,
including AGI and UGI, as equivalent to humans and grant them copyright and
patent rights. This also involves significant legal and ethical considerations.
As of now,
AI-generated content is typically attributed to their human creators or operators rather than
being granted its own legal identity.
In
summary, while your predictions provide a creative
and speculative narrative of AI's potential future, they involve a mix of
metaphorical concepts and technological assumptions that might not align with
the actual development and functioning of AI. The future of AI is likely to be
shaped by a combination of technological advancements, societal discussions,
ethical considerations, and legal frameworks that are subject to change based
on a wide range of factors.
===============================================================
With regards,
Hemen Parekh
www.hemenparekh.ai /
22 Aug 2023
Related
Readings :