I have seen the movie , “ Kramer vs
Kramer “ and the play “ Gandhi vs
Gandhi “
But I do not remember , either the themes or the
dialogues
But I wish I was able to retain a versatile / erudite “
Liar “ to plead my case in the Supreme Court in 1984 , when I lost a case to my
landlord for retaining possession of flat rented from him
That human Lawyer who I engaged, did a rather poor job
of arguing / presenting my case
If I run into a similar litigation in 2024 , I will not
have to worry
Instead of a “
Lawyer “ , I would retain a “ Liar “ [ - an Artificial
Intelligence legal luminary AVATAR ]
Here is the reason for my optimism :
Highlights :
·
IBM recently unveiled a
new artificial intelligence system that can craft lengthy, persuasive arguments during a debate.
·
At the show [ CES ],
it presented arguments
both for and against making gambling illegal. It later did the same for the idea
of developing autonomous cars.
·
Project
Debater does
little writing of its own — the AI system’s core strength comes from categorizing and analyzing the
arguments fed into it by
humans.
·
The algorithm scans short human-written
arguments on a potential debate
topic for specific keywords and language….
·
Then it groups those arguments by topic, determines
whether they’re for or against the proposal, and organizes a speech based on the arguments it analyzed.
=========================================================
Apparently , I was not too far off in envisioning the
arrival of “ Project Debater “ , when some 10 months ago , I
imagined it to deliver a judgement on Aadhar privacy issue , as described at ( - of course ,
drafted by me – a human ! ):
Nightmare
? [ 04 March
2018 ]
Any
immediate practical application ?
Of course , hiding in plain sight !
Over past few decades , dozens of lawyers have argued in various courts re
the Ayodhya
/ Ram Mandir case
By now , millions of words have been recorded in court
records – both for and against
If requested , IBM would be too happy to feed these millions
of “ words
/ phrases / sentences / paragraphs
“ into its Project
Debater , pitching TWO LIARS against each other !
Then upload those “LIAR ARGUMENTS“ on its web site . May be even a DRAFT judgement !
Won’t that be a hugely “ Face Saving Formula “ for all the parties concerned , who have repeatedly
proclaimed their intention to “ abide by the Supreme Court verdict “ ?
And for a bonus :
Party losing 2019 elections can always blame “ Artificial Intelligence “
!
=====================================================
12 Jan 2019
Rsvp :
hcp@RecruitGuru.com
No comments:
Post a Comment