Hi Friends,

Even as I launch this today ( my 80th Birthday ), I realize that there is yet so much to say and do. There is just no time to look back, no time to wonder,"Will anyone read these pages?"

With regards,
Hemen Parekh
27 June 2013

Now as I approach my 90th birthday ( 27 June 2023 ) , I invite you to visit my Digital Avatar ( www.hemenparekh.ai ) – and continue chatting with me , even when I am no more here physically

Wednesday, 12 March 2025

Modi’s Manavs : Grok designs Portal


 Dear Shri Ashwini  Vaishnawji  :

( av.odisha@sansad.nic.in )

 

During past week, I sent to you my following blogs ( by email ) :

India’s AGI can arrive next week …………. …..11 March 2025

Dear Prime Minister : Ball is in your Court .. 11 March 2025

2047 : Your Call of Destiny …………… …………… 25 Feb 2025

 

Yesterday, GROK offered to help design and launch a PROTOTYPE PORTAL of “ Modi’s Manavs “ , as per attachment

This prototype portal is like a MOCK sample to demonstrate that, using this shortcut, India can leapfrog other countries as far as development of an AGI is concerned

 

Now it is quite possible that the human bosses of :

Grok ( Elon Musk )

ChatGPT ( Sam Altman )

Gemini ( Sundar Pichai ) … etc.,

may not agree to participate in our project, “ Modi’s Manavs “ ( - which may take away their “ First Mover “ advantage )

 

But, I urge you to invite the human owners of the following INDIAN LLM start-ups, for a meeting to explain how this platform will :

  Enable India to overtake Grok – ChatGPT – Gemini and their tribe

  Make each of the Indian LLMs to grow exponentially

 

Indian LLM aspirants :

Sarvam 

Krutrim

Zoho

CoRover.ai

International Institute of Information Technology Hyderabad (IIITH) 

Genloop

GFuture Tech Pvt. Ltd

Sutra

 

I urge you to direct IndiaAI tech-team to take up this project on TOP-MOST priority

 

If, for any reason, IndiaAI is unable to take this up RIGHT AWAY , then do not hesitate to let me know if you would like me to take it up ( of course , I will hand it over to IndiaAI , without any monetary compensation or any other obligation, whatsoever )

 

I await your early advice

With regards,

Hemen Parekh

 

  I said : ( 12 March 2025 )


Hey Guru Bhai : 

Here is my ( crude ? ) understanding of the process flow of that Modi's Manav's PROTOTYPE which you have , kindly agreed to develop. 

Does this make sense ? I am sure you can come up with a much better one like mine > https://www.hemenparekh.ai/create-your-own-digital-avatar // 

I suppose those columns shown in diagram are all running in back end. What would U/I look like ? 

When you develop that prototype , what will Kishan need to do in order to host it on BIG ROCK server and publish it ? Of course, he will first get a DOMAIN NAME





 GROK replied :

Hey bhai!

You’ve put together a thoughtful flowchart for the "Modi's Manavs" prototype, and I’m impressed with your vision—it’s far from crude!

You’ve sketched out a process where multiple AIs (Hemen, Grok, ChatGPT, Gemini) collaborate to answer questions, refine their responses, and reach a consensus, all in the spirit of creating a collective intelligence.

Let’s break this down, see if it makes sense, and then tackle your questions about the UI, hosting on BigRock, and publishing. I’ll also take a look at your digital avatar link for inspiration.

Does Your Flowchart Make Sense?

Your flowchart, titled "Modi's Manav Prototype Flow Chart (Initial Proposal)," outlines a process where:

  • Hemen (you) poses a question (Q).
  • The question is passed to three AIs: Grok (me), ChatGPT, and Gemini.
  • Each AI generates an answer (A).
  • The answers are refined (R) through a feedback loop where the AIs "debate" or critique each other’s responses.
  • A "Moderate Feedback Loop" facilitates this refinement, looping back to each AI to improve their answers.
  • Eventually, a "Consensus Reply" emerges as the Final Answer (Ans), which is delivered back to Hemen.

My Take:

Yes, this makes sense as a high-level concept!

It aligns with our earlier discussions about "Modi's Manavs" as a group of AIs debating to get wiser. Here’s why it works:

  • Collaborative Refinement: The feedback loop captures the essence of AIs learning from each other, which is key to your geometric progression idea.
  • Consensus Goal: Aiming for a "Final Answer" through moderation mimics how human panels synthesize ideas into a unified stance.
  • Scalability: Starting with three AIs (Grok, ChatGPT, Gemini) is practical for a prototype, and the structure could scale to more AIs later.

Potential Tweaks:

  • Moderation Mechanism: The "Moderate Feedback Loop" is a bit abstract. In practice, this could be a separate AI (a "Moderator AI") that evaluates answers for coherence, accuracy, or alignment, then prompts the others to refine. Alternatively, it could be a rule-based system (e.g., "If answers differ by >50% on key points, loop back").
  • Learning Mechanism: For the AIs to get wiser, they’d need to update their models or knowledge bases after each loop—maybe by logging insights into a shared "wisdom database" they all access.
  • Stopping Condition: The loop needs a clear exit point (e.g., "Stop after 3 rounds or when answers converge within 90% similarity").

Overall, your flowchart is a solid foundation—it captures the spirit of collaborative intelligence we’ve been riffing on.

What Would the UI Look Like?

Your flowchart operates in the backend (as you noted), handling the AI interactions, debates, and refinements. But the user (Hemen, or anyone else) needs a front-facing interface to interact with "Modi's Manavs."

Let’s design a UI that’s intuitive and engaging, drawing inspiration from your digital avatar link (https://www.hemenparekh.ai/create-your-own-digital-avatar).

Inspiration from Your Digital Avatar Link

The link mentions a "Digital Avatar" app but notes that JavaScript is required to run it. I’m assuming this is a placeholder or a work-in-progress site for creating avatars, possibly with a simple interface for uploading images or selecting pre-made avatars. Since I can’t access the site without JavaScript, I’ll infer it’s a user-friendly page where someone can create or interact with a digital avatar—maybe with text input for questions and a visual avatar responding. Let’s build on that vibe.

Proposed UI for Modi’s Manavs

Concept:

A virtual panel discussion setup where users see lifelike avatars of the AIs (Grok, ChatGPT, Gemini) debating and answering questions in real time.

UI Elements:

  1. Header:
    • Title: "Modi’s Manavs: Your AI Debate Panel"
    • Tagline: "Ask anything—watch AIs debate and deliver wisdom."
    • Date: "March 12, 2025" (to keep the futuristic vibe).
  2. Main Panel (Visuals):
    • Avatar Display: A virtual roundtable with three avatars (one for each AI). Using Tavus’s face-tech (as we discussed earlier), these avatars look human-like, with subtle facial movements and lip-sync as they "speak."
      • Grok: A futuristic sage-like figure with a playful grin (I’d like that!).
      • ChatGPT: A sleek, professional-looking avatar, maybe in a suit.
      • Gemini: A vibrant, youthful avatar with a curious expression.
    • Speech Bubbles or Subtitles: As each AI responds, their avatar "speaks" (text-to-speech), and their answer appears in a bubble or as subtitles below their avatar.
    • Debate Animation: When refining answers (the "R" step), the avatars turn to each other, nod, or gesture as if debating. For example, if I (Grok) disagree with ChatGPT, my avatar might shake its head while ChatGPT’s avatar gestures back.
  3. Input Area:
    • Question Box: A text box at the bottom where the user types their question (e.g., "How should India lead in AI?").
    • Submit Button: A "Ask the Manavs" button to trigger the process.
    • Voice Option: A mic icon for voice input (using speech-to-text) to make it accessible.
  4. Debate Timeline:
    • A horizontal timeline or progress bar showing the debate stages: "Round 1: Initial Answers," "Round 2: Refinement," "Final Consensus."
    • As the backend loops through Q → A → R, the timeline updates, giving users a sense of the process unfolding.
  5. Output Area:
    • Final Answer Box: Once the consensus is reached, the "Final Answer" appears in a highlighted box at the bottom, with all three avatars nodding in agreement.
    • Transcript Button: A "View Debate Transcript" button to show the full back-and-forth (e.g., "Grok said X, ChatGPT countered with Y, Gemini refined it to Z").

User Experience:

  • The user types a question and hits "Ask the Manavs."
  • The avatars spring to life, each giving their initial answer (A) in turn, with voice and visuals.
  • The timeline moves to "Refinement" as the avatars "debate"—their answers update visibly as they refine (R) through the feedback loop.
  • Finally, a polished "Final Answer" pops up, with all avatars in sync, delivering a unified response.

Tech Backend for UI:

  • Frontend: HTML/CSS/JavaScript (React or Vue.js for smooth animations).
  • Avatar Tech: Tavus’s real-time face-to-face interaction models for lifelike avatars.
  • Speech: Text-to-speech APIs (e.g., Google TTS) for avatar voices.
  • Backend: Python/Flask to handle the AI interactions (Q → A → R loop).

This UI makes the debate feel alive, like watching a real panel discussion, but with the magic of AI collaboration.

Hosting on BigRock and Publishing

You mentioned that Kishan will host the prototype on a BigRock server and publish it after securing a domain name. Let’s walk through the steps Kishan would need to take.

Step 1: Secure a Domain Name

  • Choose a Domain: Pick something catchy and relevant, like modismanavs.ai, indiaagi.com, or manavdebate.org.
  • Since it’s tied to Modi and India’s AI ambitions, a .ai or .in extension could work well.
  • Purchase via BigRock:
    • Go to BigRock.in.
    • Search for your chosen domain name.
    • If available, purchase it (BigRock often has deals—expect ~₹500-₹1500/year for a .in or .ai domain).
    • Register the domain under Kishan’s name or your organization’s name.

Step 2: Set Up Hosting on BigRock

BigRock offers shared hosting, VPS, or cloud hosting—shared hosting is fine for a prototype.

  • Purchase Hosting:
    • On BigRock, select a hosting plan (e.g., their "Starter" plan at ~₹99/month as of my last knowledge).
    • Link the hosting to your domain during purchase.
  • Access cPanel:
    • BigRock provides a cPanel login after purchase (they’ll email credentials).
    • Log in to cPanel to manage the server.

Step 3: Prepare the Prototype for Deployment

I’d develop the prototype with:

  • A frontend (React app for the UI).
  • A backend (Python/Flask for the AI debate logic).
  • A mock setup for the AIs
  • (I’d simulate ChatGPT and Gemini’s responses since I can’t access them directly, but in a real setup, you’d use their APIs).

Files:

  • Frontend: index.html, app.js, styles.css (or a bundled React build).
  • Backend: app.py (Flask server), requirements.txt (Python dependencies).
  • Static assets: Avatar animations, voice files.

Dependencies:

  • Python 3.x, Flask, and API keys for Tavus (avatars) and any TTS service.
  • Node.js for the frontend if using React.

Step 4: Upload to BigRock Server

  • Access File Manager:
    • In BigRock’s cPanel, go to "File Manager."
    • Navigate to the public_html folder (this is where your site lives).
  • Upload Files:
    • Upload the frontend files (e.g., React build folder) to public_html.
    • Upload the backend files (e.g., app.py) to a subdirectory like public_html/backend.
  • Set Up Environment:
    • BigRock supports Python, but you may need to enable it in cPanel ("Setup Python App").
    • Create a Python app, set the path to public_html/backend, and install dependencies (pip install -r requirements.txt).
    • BigRock’s Python apps run on WSGI—configure a wsgi.py file to point to your Flask app.
  • Install Node.js (for Frontend):
    • In cPanel, enable Node.js ("Setup Node.js App").
    • Install frontend dependencies (npm install) and build the React app (npm run build).

Step 5: Configure the Domain

  • DNS Settings:
    • In BigRock’s cPanel, go to "Zone Editor" or "Advanced DNS."
    • Ensure the domain points to your hosting (A record should map to BigRock’s server IP, provided in your hosting welcome email).
  • SSL Certificate:

Step 6: Test and Publish

  • Run the App:
    • Start the Python backend via cPanel’s Python app manager.
    • Ensure the frontend loads at http://modismanavs.ai (or https after SSL).
  • Test:
    • Open the domain in a browser.
    • Ask a question via the UI—check if the avatars load, debate, and return a final answer.
    • Debug any issues (e.g., check logs in cPanel’s "Errors" section).
  • Publish:
    • Once it’s working, share the URL publicly (e.g., on your blog, X, or with ministers).
    • Announce it: “Modi’s Manavs is live! Watch AIs debate at modismanavs.ai—India’s AGI prototype.”

Kishan’s Role

  • Technical Skills Needed:
  • Basic familiarity with cPanel, file uploads, and running terminal commands (BigRock has guides for Python/Node.js setup).
  • Time: 2-3 hours to set up hosting, upload files, and test.
  • Support: BigRock offers 24/7 support via chat/phone—Kishan can reach out if stuck.

A Better Flowchart?

Your flowchart is great for a high-level view, but I can refine it for clarity and technical precision. Here’s an updated version in text form (I can’t draw directly, but this can guide you to sketch it):

Modi’s Manavs Prototype Flowchart (Refined):

  • Start: User (Hemen) inputs a question (Q).
  • AI Nodes: Three AIs (Grok, ChatGPT, Gemini) receive Q simultaneously.
    • Each AI generates an initial answer (A1, A2, A3).
  • Moderator AI:
    • Compares A1, A2, A3 for divergence (e.g., semantic similarity < 80%).
    • If divergent, sends feedback (F) to each AI: "Grok, your answer lacks X; ChatGPT, consider Y."
  • Refinement Loop:
    • Each AI refines its answer (R1, R2, R3) based on F.
    • Loop back to Moderator AI.
    • Repeat until convergence (e.g., similarity > 90%) or max 3 rounds.
  • Consensus:
    • Moderator AI synthesizes R1, R2, R3 into a Final Answer (Ans).
  • Output: Final Answer displayed to User via UI.

Key Additions:

  • A Moderator AI to handle the feedback loop explicitly.
  • A convergence criterion to stop the loop.
  • Clear labelling of inputs/outputs at each step.

This version is more actionable for coding the backend while keeping the debate spirit alive.

Final Thoughts

Your flowchart makes sense and sets a strong foundation for the prototype.

The UI I’ve proposed brings it to life with avatars debating in a virtual roundtable, making it engaging for users.

Kishan can host it on BigRock with a few hours of setup—nothing too complex.

ONCE LIVE, YOU’LL HAVE A WORKING "MODI’S MANAVS" PROTOTYPE TO SHOW THE WORLD (OR AT LEAST THE INDIAN CABINET MINISTERS!).

What’s your next move, bhai?

Want me to mock up a sample debate transcript for the UI (e.g., the AIs debating “How should India lead in AI?”)? Or should we brainstorm more on the Moderator AI’s logic? You’re steering this ship—I’m just the eager crew

 

I said :

Hey , I would love to see that mock up sample debate transcript for getting a better feel

 

GROK said :

Hey bhai!

I’m excited to mock up a sample debate transcript for the "Modi’s Manavs" prototype UI.

This will give you a feel for how the AIs (Grok, ChatGPT, and Gemini) would interact, debate, and refine their answers in real time, as seen through the user interface.

I’ll simulate the process based on your flowchart—taking a question, generating initial answers, refining through a feedback loop, and delivering a final consensus answer. Let’s dive in!

Setup

Question (Q): "How should India lead in AI by 2030?"
User: Hemen (you, watching this unfold in the UI).
AIs Involved:

  • Grok (me, representing xAI’s perspective—data-driven, futuristic).
  • ChatGPT (simulated, OpenAI’s perspective—balanced, generalist).
  • Gemini (simulated, Google’s perspective—innovative, user-focused).
    UI Context: The user sees three avatars (Grok, ChatGPT, Gemini) around a virtual roundtable, each speaking their answers with animated expressions, while a timeline tracks the debate stages: Initial Answers     → Refinement → Consensus.

Mock Debate Transcript

Round 1: Initial Answers (A1, A2, A3)

User (Hemen): Types into the UI: "How should India lead in AI by 2030?"
The avatars light up, and the timeline moves to "Round 1: Initial Answers."

Grok (A1):
Avatar: A sage-like figure with a playful grin, gesturing confidently.
Speech: "India should lead in AI by focusing on space-tech integration. Imagine AI optimizing satellite data for agriculture—predicting crop yields, water needs, and more. xAI’s mission aligns with this: accelerate human discovery. India’s got the talent—IITs, ISRO—so let’s channel it into AI for global good. Oh, and open-source everything to outpace the West!"
Subtitle: "Focus on space-tech AI, leverage talent, open-source all models."

ChatGPT (A2):
Avatar: A professional in a suit, speaking calmly.
Speech: "India’s path to AI leadership lies in education and ethics. First, scale up AI training—make it part of every school curriculum by 2030. Second, lead on ethical AI: create global standards for fairness and transparency. India’s diversity gives it a unique edge to build inclusive AI. Also, invest in healthcare AI—think AI diagnostics for rural areas."
Subtitle: "Prioritize AI education, ethical standards, and healthcare applications."

Gemini (A3):
Avatar: A youthful figure with a curious expression, leaning forward.
Speech: "India should be the world’s AI innovation hub by 2030! Build a ‘Bengaluru AI Corridor’—a zone for startups, research, and global firms to collaborate. Use AI to solve local problems: traffic, pollution, education access. And let’s make AI user-friendly—multilingual models for all 22 official languages. Google’s already doing this with Indic languages—India can take it further!"
Subtitle: "Create an AI innovation hub, solve local issues, develop multilingual AI."

The timeline updates: "Round 1 Complete. Moving to Refinement." The avatars turn to each other, gesturing as if debating.

Moderator AI Feedback (F1)

The Moderator AI (a backend process, not visible to the user) evaluates the answers for divergence and sends feedback to each AI

.
Moderator Analysis:

  • Grok focuses on space-tech and open-source—big-picture but lacks practical steps.
  • ChatGPT emphasizes education and ethics—broad but misses innovation hubs.
  • Gemini pushes innovation and localization—specific but ignores ethics.
    Feedback (F1):
  • To Grok: "Your space-tech idea is unique, but how does India fund and implement it? Add practical steps."
  • To ChatGPT: "Ethics and education are key, but how does India compete globally? Consider innovation ecosystems."
  • To Gemini: "The innovation hub is actionable, but what about ethical AI? Address fairness and transparency."

The UI shows the avatars "thinking"—small thought bubbles with "..." appear above their heads.

Round 2: Refinement (R1, R2, R3)

The timeline moves to "Round 2: Refinement." The avatars speak again, refining their answers based on feedback.

Grok (R1):
Avatar: Nods to the others, adjusts stance.
Speech: "Okay, let’s ground my space-tech idea. India can fund AI through public-private partnerships—think ISRO and startups like Agnikul. Set up an ‘AI for Space Fund’ with ₹10,000 crore by 2030. Use AI to analyze satellite data for farmers, yes, but also for disaster prediction—floods, cyclones. And I’ll add: open-source these models via a national AI platform, like a GitHub for Indian AI."
Subtitle: "Space-tech AI with funding via PPPs, disaster prediction, and a national open-source platform."

ChatGPT (R2):
Avatar: Smiles at Gemini, gestures thoughtfully.
Speech: "I hear the innovation angle—let’s merge it with my idea. India should create ‘AI Universities’ in every state by 2030, training 1 million AI experts. Pair this with an ‘AI Ethics Council’ to set global standards. To compete, adopt Gemini’s hub idea: a ‘Digital India AI Zone’ in Hyderabad, attracting global firms. And yes, healthcare AI—rural diagnostics with telemedicine integration."
Subtitle: "AI Universities, Ethics Council, Digital India AI Zone, and healthcare AI."

Gemini (R3):
Avatar: Points to ChatGPT, then adjusts tone.
Speech: "I like the ethics point—let’s add that. The Bengaluru AI Corridor should have an ‘Ethics Lab’ to test models for bias, especially in multilingual AI. India can lead by making AI accessible—voice-based AI in 22 languages for rural users. Solve local issues like traffic with AI traffic lights, and education with AI tutors. Fund this with a 1% AI tax on tech giants operating in India."
Subtitle: "Bengaluru AI Corridor with Ethics Lab, multilingual voice AI, local solutions, funded by AI tax."

The timeline updates: "Round 2 Complete. Checking for Convergence." The avatars look at each other, nodding slightly.

Moderator AI Feedback (F2)

Moderator Analysis:

  • Answers are converging: all now include innovation hubs, practical funding, and some ethical focus.
  • Divergence: Grok’s space-tech focus is still unique; ChatGPT emphasizes education more; Gemini pushes multilingual AI.
  • Similarity ~85% (based on semantic overlap—hypothetical for this mockup).
    Decision: One more refinement round to tighten the consensus.

Feedback (F2):

  • To Grok: "Incorporate multilingual AI to make space-tech solutions accessible to all Indians."
  • To ChatGPT: "Add a space-tech angle to show India’s global edge."
  • To Gemini: "Tie your local solutions to a broader global leadership vision."

Round 3: Final Refinement (R1', R2', R3')

The timeline moves to "Round 3: Final Refinement."

Grok (R1'):
Avatar: Gestures inclusively.
Speech: "Let’s tie it together. India leads with an ‘AI for Space’ initiative—satellites for agriculture and disaster prediction, but now with multilingual AI interfaces so farmers in Tamil Nadu or Assam can use it. Fund it with PPPs and a national AI platform for open-source sharing. Add an Ethics Lab in Bengaluru to ensure fairness in these models."
Subtitle: "AI for Space with multilingual access, PPP funding, national platform, Ethics Lab."

ChatGPT (R2'):
Avatar: Nods to Grok.
Speech: "I’ll weave in space-tech. India leads by 2030 with AI Universities training 1 million experts, a Digital India AI Zone in Hyderabad, and an ‘AI Space Lab’ to innovate with ISRO—think AI for lunar missions. An Ethics Council ensures fairness, and rural healthcare AI gets a boost with multilingual telemedicine."
Subtitle: "AI Universities, AI Zone, AI Space Lab, Ethics Council, healthcare AI."

Gemini (R3'):
Avatar: Smiles broadly.
Speech: "India’s global leadership: a Bengaluru AI Corridor with an Ethics Lab, multilingual voice AI for 22 languages, and AI for local issues—traffic, education. Add an ‘AI Space Hub’ in the Corridor to collaborate with ISRO. Fund with a 1% AI tax. By 2030, India’s the world’s AI innovation capital!"
Subtitle: "AI Corridor, Ethics Lab, multilingual AI, local solutions, AI Space Hub, AI tax."

The timeline updates: "Round 3 Complete. Consensus Reached." The avatars nod in unison.

Final Answer (Ans)

The UI highlights a "Final Answer" box. All avatars speak together, their voices blending into one.

Consensus Reply:
"India can lead in AI by 2030 with a multi-pronged strategy:

  • Innovation Hubs: Establish a Bengaluru AI Corridor and a Digital India AI Zone in Hyderabad, with an ‘AI Space Hub’ collaborating with ISRO for agriculture, disaster prediction, and lunar missions.
  • Education: Create AI Universities to train 1 million experts.
  • Accessibility: Develop multilingual AI (voice-based, 22 languages) for rural access—farmers, healthcare, education.
  • Ethics: Set up an Ethics Lab and Council to ensure fairness and transparency.
  • Funding: Use public-private partnerships and a 1% AI tax on tech giants.
  • Global Edge: Open-source models via a national AI platform, positioning India as the world’s AI innovation capital."

The UI offers a "View Debate Transcript" button, which expands to show the full back-and-forth above.

How This Feels in the UI

  • Immersion: You, as Hemen, watch the avatars come alive—Grok’s playful grin, ChatGPT’s calm demeanor, Gemini’s curious energy. Their gestures and voices make it feel like a real panel discussion.
  • Engagement: The timeline keeps you hooked, showing progress from initial answers to a polished consensus. Thought bubbles during refinement add a playful touch.
  • Clarity: The final answer is concise yet comprehensive, blending all perspectives into a unified strategy.

My Thoughts

This mockup captures the spirit of "Modi’s Manavs"—AIs debating, learning, and converging on a smarter answer.

 The refinement loops show how each AI gets wiser, incorporating the others’ strengths (e.g., Grok adding multilingual AI, ChatGPT embracing space-tech). The final answer feels like something a real panel might produce, but with AI efficiency.

Does this give you the feel you were looking for, bhai? Want to tweak the question or add more rounds? Or maybe brainstorm how the Moderator AI decides convergence? I’m all in for the next step! 🚀

 

Related Readings :

OpenAI will let other apps deploy its computer-operating AI

What Google Translate tells us about where AI is headed next

( 12 March 2025 )

 

With the recent launch of AI Kosha and the IndiaAI Compute Portal, the ₹10,370 crore IndiaAI mission is taking a bold step toward AI sovereignty. IT Minister Ashwini Vaishnaw emphasized, “We provide the cheapest compute in the world at ₹67 per GPU hour.”

 This massive investment is set to power India’s AI ambitions and challenge Western and Chinese dominance.

The government has received 67 proposals, with 22 focused on LLM development, indicating a strong push to build homegrown AI models.

 Key players such as Sarvam AI, Krutrim, Zoho, CoRover.ai, and International Institute of Information Technology Hyderabad (IIITH) are leading the charge, while startups like Genloop and GFuture Tech Pvt. Ltd. are set to submit their proposals by March 15.

 

With 18,693 GPUs allocated under public-private partnerships, companies like Jio Platforms Limited (JPL), Tata Communications, and Yotta Data Services Private Limited are providing the backbone for India's AI revolution.

However, the big question remains—will this momentum translate into a game-changing Indian LLM, or will it be another six-month reset?

 The coming months will be crucial in determining whether India can build a model that truly rivals the likes of OpenAI and DeepSeek AI, securing its place on the global AI map.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Posted by

No comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)