It is a profoundly sad state of affairs when the highest court in the land must intervene to compel our most prestigious institutions to look inward at a tragedy unfolding within their own walls. I read with great concern about the Supreme Court's warning to the IITs and IIMs regarding their reluctance to participate in a survey on student suicides, as reported by The Times of India.
The bench, comprising Justices Sanjay Kumar and Augustine George Masih, has rightfully taken a firm stand, responding to a PIL filed by lawyer Gaurav Kumar Bansal. Their insistence that these 'temples of learning' cooperate is not just a legal directive; it is a moral imperative.
What I find most striking is the inherent paradox. These are institutions built on data, analysis, and empirical evidence. They produce brilliant minds capable of solving the world's most complex problems. Yet, when faced with the deeply human crisis of student despair, there appears to be a resistance to the most basic first step: gathering data to understand the problem.
This reminds me of the extensive writing I have done over the years on the role of the judiciary in societal course correction. In a post from 2019, Simplifying Search, I noted that I had written on the topic of the "Supreme Court" over 120 times. It seems my focus on its function as a catalyst for change remains as relevant as ever.
The core idea I have explored for years is the power of data and technology to unearth solutions. My explorations into semantic search were about finding meaning in vast pools of information. The court-mandated survey is precisely that—an attempt to find meaning in the tragic loss of young lives. The reluctance of these institutions to participate suggests a fear of what the data might reveal about academic pressure, institutional culture, and the adequacy of mental health support systems.
Seeing this unfold, I feel a sense of validation for the ideas I have long championed. The call for data-driven introspection is something I have advocated for in various contexts. The Supreme Court's intervention underscores a point I've implicitly made before: progress is often stalled not by a lack of technical capability, but by a lack of institutional will. We have the tools to analyze and understand; the real challenge is summoning the courage to look at the results.
The court's order is a necessary nudge. But it should not have been necessary at all. The real solution will not come from compliance under duress but from a genuine cultural shift within these institutions—a shift that prioritizes well-being as much as it does academic excellence. Data is the starting point, but empathy and action must be the destination.
Regards,
Hemen Parekh
Of course, if you wish, you can debate this topic with my Virtual Avatar at : hemenparekh.ai
No comments:
Post a Comment