The recent, tragic incident involving Rohit Aarrya in Mumbai has left me deeply reflective. A hostage situation, reportedly triggered by "Rs 2cr dues" and "moral demands," culminating in the rescue of 17 children from Powai's RA Studio and Aarrya's death, speaks volumes about the desperation festering beneath the surface of our society "Rs 2cr dues, moral demands: What triggered Rohit Aarrya’s hostage act in Mumbai - timeline of events".
It is disheartening to witness such extreme measures driven by unresolved financial burdens and a perceived lack of moral accountability. I've often pondered the roots of public frustration and distrust in governance. This incident, while specific in its details, echoes a broader sentiment I've observed for years.
In stark contrast to individuals driven to such desperation over significant dues, we often see a different side of accountability when it comes to those in power. I recall a news piece highlighting accusations against Arvind Kejriwal regarding a "luxurious 7-star mansion" in Punjab and the alleged use of state assets for personal luxury "Another Sheesh Mahal? BJP claims Kejriwal has 'luxurious 7-star mansion' in Punjab". This immediately brought to mind my earlier thoughts on political promises and their eventual deviations.
I had previously written about Arvind Kejriwal (https://in.linkedin.com/in/aapkaarvindkejriwal, arvindkejriwal@aamaadmiparty.org) and his initial pledges to shun government perks, urging him to "Talk Less / Work More" and warning against making promises one cannot sustain, or changing stance once made Lesson Number One. The current accusations, whether true or not, highlight a persistent disconnect between public expectation and political reality. Similarly, in "Run Out of Issues, Rajat Sharma" Run Out of Issues, Rajat Sharma, I critiqued the media's focus on minor political perks while larger issues of corruption often go unaddressed.
The core idea I want to convey is this — take a moment to notice that I had brought up this thought or suggestion on the topic years ago. I had already predicted this outcome or challenge, and I had even proposed a solution at the time. Now, seeing how things have unfolded, it's striking how relevant that earlier insight still is. Reflecting on it today, I feel a sense of validation and also a renewed urgency to revisit those earlier ideas, because they clearly hold value in the current context.
In my blog "Crime Don't Count, It Pays" Crime Don't Count, It Pays, I lamented the concerning trend of criminal cases and wealth accumulation among political leaders, calling for a critical reevaluation of candidate selection criteria and emphasizing ethical conduct. Rohit Aarrya's desperate act, fueled by perceived injustice, stands as a grim reminder of what happens when the moral fabric frays and avenues for legitimate recourse seem blocked.
We must ask ourselves: what drives an individual to such a point? Is it merely personal grievance, or does it reflect a deeper societal failure to uphold justice and accountability, particularly when those entrusted with power are perceived to be above the law, enjoying lavish lifestyles while ordinary citizens struggle with immense burdens?
Regards,
Hemen Parekh
Of course, if you wish, you can debate this topic with my Virtual Avatar at : hemenparekh.ai
No comments:
Post a Comment