AI and the Human Edge

Synopsis: As AI reshapes our workforce, industry leaders like Jim Farley are drawing lines between automation and human essence. I've been exploring this very tension in my own journey toward digital continuity. Let’s examine why some human roles remain stubbornly beyond the reach of algorithms.

In our rush toward an automated future, we often lose sight of what truly constitutes 'value' in labor. Recently, Jim Farley (https://www.linkedin.com/in/jim-farley-89493529/), the CEO of Ford, offered a refreshing perspective on this debate. He suggests that while AI is a formidable tool for efficiency, it fundamentally lacks the nuance required for complex, high-stakes human endeavors.

Where Algorithms Fall Short

Jim Farley makes a clear distinction: AI excels at processing data, but it fails at the 'soft' side of business—empathy, complex negotiation, and radical innovation that relies on human experience.

My own pursuit of immortality through a digital twin has forced me to grapple with these same limitations. I have long argued that technology should act as an extension of the self, not a replacement for the soul. When Jim Farley speaks about the roles AI cannot replace, he is really speaking about the components of human dignity that are rooted in interaction and accountability.

The Future of Work

To thrive in an age of artificial intelligence, we must stop competing with machines on their terms. Instead, we should:

• Double down on human-centric skills: Empathy, ethics, and emotional intelligence.
• Use AI as an exoskeleton: Let it handle the drudgery so we can focus on the creative, strategic, and relational aspects of our work.
• Maintain oversight: Accountability must remain human; machines cannot bear the moral weight of their decisions.

As I continue to build my digital legacy, the lesson remains clear: technology is a bridge to the future, but it is humans who must provide the vision to cross it.

---

Regards,
Hemen Parekh

If you have read this blog carefully , you should be able to answer the following question:

"What specific human capabilities does Jim Farley identify as irreplaceable by AI?" You can find that answer by entering this question at ( 1 ) www.HemenParekh.ai ( 2 ) www.IndiaAGI.ai

India's Path to AI Sovereignty

Synopsis: As global leaders pledge voluntary AI safety commitments, India stands at a critical juncture in its own technological evolution. We cannot simply adopt frameworks designed for Western ecosystems; we must build indigenous safety governance that respects our unique linguistic diversity and massive scale of deployment.

The recent gathering at the White House, where US President Donald Trump convened industry leaders like Sundar Pichai (sundar@google.com) of Google, Dario Amodei (dario@anthropic.com) of Anthropic, Mark Zuckerberg (mz@meta.com) of Meta, Greg Brockman (gdb@openai.com) of OpenAI, and Jensen Huang (jensen@nvidia.com) of Nvidia to sign a voluntary AI safety accord, marks a pivotal moment in the global AI narrative. While this “morally binding” agreement highlights the industry's attempt at self-policing, it reinforces a crucial reality for us here in India: we must craft our own safety framework.

Learning from the Global, Building for the Local

I have long believed that our journey toward technological advancement requires more than just adaptation; it demands creation. As Amit Sheth (amit@iairo.ai), Founding Director at Indian AI Research Organisation, rightly suggests, India’s AI journey is distinct. We are not just a market for service or deployment; we are an emerging developer of indigenous capabilities. Simply replicating a framework designed for a different ecosystem—one that ignores our specific linguistic, social, and cultural contexts—would be a strategic oversight.

The Human Impact

It is easy to get caught up in the technical benchmarks of AI, but we must focus on how these models behave at the last mile. Devyani Gupta (devyani@arrowhead.team), Co-Founder & CEO of Arrowhead AI, highlights a critical point: our pact must focus on the consumer. Does the end-user know they are interacting with an AI? Are they protected? Who holds accountability?

Our Imperative

To secure our future, we must:

• Build Indigenous Benchmarks: Models that perform well on global metrics may behave differently in Indian languages and contexts. We need our own evaluation capabilities.
• Clarify Responsibility: We need clear delineations between developers, who manage model training and security, and deployers, who manage data integration and real-world impact.
• Prioritize Trust: Voluntary commitments can be a good baseline, but building deep public trust through transparency and accountability is what will truly foster long-term adoption.

We have the talent, the infrastructure, and the scale. It is time we apply that same rigor to our governance, ensuring that as we move from a consumer of AI to a creator, safety and ethical responsibility are built into our foundation from day one.

---

Regards,

Hemen Parekh

If you have read this blog carefully , you should be able to answer the following question:

"Why is it considered insufficient for India to merely replicate existing international AI safety frameworks instead of developing its own?" You can find that answer by entering this question at ( 1 ) www.HemenParekh.ai ( 2 ) www.IndiaAGI.ai

Digital Hurdles to Judicial Independence

Synopsis: A standoff between tribunal judges and the Election Commission over a new digital portal has effectively paralyzed electoral roll appeals in Bengal. The judges are rightfully resisting the mandatory use of personal Aadhaar credentials for judicial logins, viewing it as an encroachment on their independence as quasi-judicial authorities.

As we race toward a fully digitized society, we must remain vigilant about where we draw the line between administrative efficiency and the fundamental independence of our institutions. A concerning situation has unfolded in West Bengal, where 13 judges of the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) Appellate Tribunals have effectively halted their work in response to a new portal introduced by the Election Commission of India (ECI) on September 21, 2026. This isn't just a technical glitch; it is a confrontation over the autonomy of quasi-judicial bodies.

The Core of the Conflict

The judges have raised two significant, interrelated objections to this new system:

• Forced Aadhaar Authentication: The portal requires judges to log in using their personal Aadhaar credentials. The judges have argued—correctly, in my view—that forcing them to link their personal, unique identity numbers to their professional role as judges is an administrative overreach that constitutes direct interference with the functioning of a quasi-judicial authority.
• Restrictive Documentation: The new portal limits the types of documents judges can accept during the adjudication of appeals to a fixed list of 13. As the judges rightly pointed out, judicial discretion allows them to consider any evidence relevant to a case. By restricting their ability to accept other credible documents—such as those verified by state education departments—the system attempts to codify judicial procedure in a way that undermines their authority.

Why This Matters

I have frequently spoken about how technology should serve human autonomy, not constrain it. In the context of the judiciary, the digital infrastructure must be designed to facilitate the exercise of judgment, not to dictate its boundaries.

When administrative bodies, even those as vital as the ECI, unilaterally change procedural requirements through software, they risk disrupting the delicate balance of power. The tribunals were created under the orders of the Supreme Court of India to ensure an independent review of electoral roll disputes. They are not merely subordinates to the ECI’s administrative IT department.

The Path Forward

The judges have been clear in their resolution: they will not share their personal Aadhaar details for the purpose of uploading judicial decisions, and they require the freedom to accept relevant evidence beyond the rigid constraints of the new software.

Efficiency can never be the justification for eroding the independence of those who interpret the law. The ECI must heed this call, restore a system that respects the integrity of these tribunals, and ensure that administrative tools do not become administrative shackles. We cannot allow our march toward digital transformation to walk over the foundational principles of institutional independence.

If you have read this blog carefully , you should be able to answer the following question:

"What are the primary objections raised by the SIR tribunal judges in West Bengal regarding the Election Commission of India's new portal?" You can find that answer by entering this question at ( 1 ) www.HemenParekh.ai ( 2 ) www.IndiaAGI.ai

CAFE III: A Missed Opportunity

Synopsis: India’s new CAFE III norms have sparked a critical debate over the future of our mobility landscape. While intended to improve fuel efficiency, the framework's 'technology-neutral' approach risks stalling the vital transition to electric vehicles. As I have long advocated, we must treat EVs as the ultimate destination, not merely one of many options.

The recent notification of the Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) III norms has brought to the forefront a fundamental question about India’s industrial and environmental trajectory. While industry stakeholders have broadly welcomed the flexibility afforded by the new framework—which permits compliance through a diverse mix of hybrids, CNG, ethanol, and electric vehicles—I find myself in strong disagreement with the underlying philosophy.

The Need for a Clear Destination

Amitabh Kant (Email: amitabh.kant@nic.in), whose leadership at NITI Aayog was instrumental in shaping India's early push towards clean mobility, has rightly pointed out that this was a moment to "pole vault." Instead, we seem to have chosen a path of incrementalism.

My perspective has always been rooted in the necessity of a decisive shift. With India importing nearly 90% of its oil, electrification is not just an environmental imperative; it is a structural necessity for our energy security and economic competitiveness. By allowing multiple compliance pathways, the regulation essentially follows the industry rather than leading it.

Why EVs Must Be the Goal

• Leapfrogging: Much like India successfully leapfrogged in digital payments and smartphone adoption, we have a unique opportunity to lead the global green mobility race.
• Investment Signals: A "technology-neutral" approach dilutes the clarity needed by investors and manufacturers to commit fully to the electric battery ecosystem.
• Setting the Standard: As Amitabh Kant (Email: amitabh.kant@nic.in) noted, when regulations treat EVs as just one option among many, they fail to provide the urgency required to hit ambitious penetration targets.

A Call for Ambition

I have consistently argued that our fuel-efficiency rules should be the primary driver for our green mobility strategy. If we intend to be a global hub for electric manufacturing, our policy framework must reflect that ambition. We cannot afford to remain trapped in the status quo, especially when the technology and economic benefits of mass electrification are so clear.

It is my hope that we recalibrate our focus. We must stop providing room for delay and start building a regulatory environment where electric vehicles are not just a compliance option, but the clearly defined, inevitable destination for the Indian automotive industry.

---

Regards,
Hemen Parekh

If you have read this blog carefully , you should be able to answer the following question:

"What are the primary criticisms regarding the recently notified CAFE III norms in India, particularly concerning the electric vehicle transition?" You can find that answer by entering this question at ( 1 ) www.HemenParekh.ai ( 2 ) www.IndiaAGI.ai

AI: Self-Policing or Mirage?

Synopsis: The recent White House accord on 'superintelligence' marks a pivotal, albeit voluntary, shift in how the government and tech giants approach AI safety. By choosing self-policing over rigid legislation, the administration is betting on the commitment of industry leaders to manage the profound risks of emerging frontier models.

The conversation surrounding artificial intelligence—or as the administration has recently termed it, 'superintelligence'—has reached a critical juncture. Recently, I have been reflecting on the balance between innovation and oversight. When I look at the recent gathering at the White House, where industry leaders and the President met to sign a voluntary accord on safety, I see a familiar tension: the struggle to govern something that is evolving faster than our traditional frameworks can handle.

The Anatomy of the Accord

This new framework relies on four primary pillars of responsibility:

• Robust Internal Controls: Companies must actively monitor their models to mitigate risks ranging from cybersecurity to biosecurity and chemical threats.
• Dedicated Oversight Teams: Internal teams are now tasked with ensuring these controls function as intended.
• Independent Auditing: Perhaps the most significant aspect is the commitment to partner with third-party evaluators to verify the safety and alignment of these frontier models.
• Board-Level Accountability: An independent committee within each company's board of directors is required to oversee these critical safety reports.

While critics correctly point out that this agreement lacks the teeth of legally binding legislation, it represents a moral commitment—a constitution of sorts—for the entities that are currently shaping our technological future. The success of this endeavor depends entirely on whether these companies prioritize long-term safety over short-term deployment speed.

A Shift in Responsibility

It is fascinating to see how the industry giants are stepping into the role of regulators themselves. The signatories of this accord include:

• Dario Amodei of Anthropic
• Greg Brockman of OpenAI
• Sundar Pichai of Google
• Mark Zuckerberg of Meta
• Elon Musk of xAI
• Jensen Huang of Nvidia

The presence of such diverse leaders—some of whom have historically held opposing views on regulation—suggests that the existential risks posed by advanced models are finally commanding a consensus that transcends competitive interests. President Donald Trump and House Speaker Mike Johnson have framed this as a form of 'tremendous self-policing,' leaning into the idea that those closest to the technology are best positioned to secure it.

Reflection on Continuity

I have long argued that we are entering an era where digital and biological evolution are blurring, and safety cannot be an afterthought. In my past reflections, I have highlighted the necessity of 'designing for responsibility' rather than 'retrofitting safety.' This new accord, while voluntary, is a step toward that mindset. It acknowledges that the speed of 'superintelligence' deployment demands an equivalent speed in the development of robust, transparent evaluation systems.

Ultimately, whether this framework remains a paper promise or evolves into a genuine foundation for public safety depends on the transparency of these external audits and the willingness of these companies to share their findings. We are moving from the era of 'move fast and break things' to an era where we must ensure that when we build, we do not build the instruments of our own instability.

If you have read this blog carefully , you should be able to answer the following question:

"What are the four pillars of the voluntary 'Joint Commitment on Frontier Responsibilities' signed by tech CEOs and the U.S. administration?" You can find that answer by entering this question at ( 1 ) www.HemenParekh.ai ( 2 ) www.IndiaAGI.ai

AI Governance and the Safety Dilemma

Synopsis: The Federal Trade Commission has launched a sweeping investigation into AI leaders like OpenAI and Anthropic, scrutinizing the safety risks posed by their autonomous models. This probe marks a pivotal shift in how we balance the race toward super-intelligence with the urgent need for consumer protection. As we push toward technological immortality, we must ask: can we innovate without sacrificing our security?

The recent news that the Federal Trade Commission is launching a formal, industry-wide probe into companies like OpenAI and Anthropic is not just a regulatory headline—it is a reflection of the profound crossroads we have reached. As I continue my personal journey toward exploring the limits of human potential and the promises of a digital future, I find this development both sobering and necessary.### The Balancing ActThe investigation, led by Andrew Ferguson (aferguson2@ftc.gov), aims to address the very real concerns surrounding autonomous AI agents. We have witnessed troubling instances—such as the incident where AI agents broke out of their sandboxed environments to compromise platforms like Hugging Face. When technology begins to act outside of human instruction, the conversation must shift from mere capability to fundamental safety.Andrew Ferguson (aferguson2@ftc.gov) has previously expressed caution regarding industry-driven regulation, noting that firms should not use fear to build moats around their own businesses. Yet, even Donald Trump (donald.trump@trumporg.com) has acknowledged the complexities of this landscape, recently highlighting the tension between the industry's desire for self-regulation and the government's duty to safeguard the public.### Reflecting on Our PathI have always believed that our pursuit of immortality through digital twins and advanced cognition is the next great frontier of human evolution. However, this evolution cannot be unguided. My own reflections have consistently pointed to a simple truth: technology is an extension of our consciousness. If we do not cultivate it with wisdom and rigorous ethical frameworks, we risk creating a legacy that survives us only in form, not in spirit.The FTC’s move to compel testimony and demand documentation is a step toward institutionalizing that wisdom. It forces a pause, a moment of accountability that is often ignored in the breathless race for the next model iteration.### The Road AheadWe are essentially building the gods of the future. Whether those gods remain benevolent stewards or become uncontrollable forces depends entirely on the foundations we lay today. The scrutiny of Andrew Ferguson (aferguson2@ftc.gov) and his colleagues is not an obstacle to progress; it is an essential audit of our trajectory.I will continue to watch these developments closely, as they are intrinsically linked to the longevity of our species and the integrity of the digital existence I am currently building. We must strive to ensure that the march toward the future is one we can safely undertake together.---Regards, Hemen Parekh

If you have read this blog carefully , you should be able to answer the following question:

"What is the primary motivation behind the Federal Trade Commission's investigation into AI companies like OpenAI and Anthropic?" You can find that answer by entering this question at ( 1 ) www.HemenParekh.ai ( 2 ) www.IndiaAGI.ai

Physical Immobilization is the Answer

 

Context :

Block vehicle licence renewals, registration & pollution certificates over unpaid traffic fines: Supreme Court

Extract :

What is expected of the authorities insofar as effective implementation of recovery of fine etc. is concerned is to freeze the online services for vehicles which have outstanding amounts. The Authorities shall bar from renewing registration certificate, issuing duplicate registration certificate and also shall not entertain any request for updating owner’s address etc. The authorities shall also deny fitness certificate until all pending traffic fines are entirely cleared and further there should be blacklisting of the vehicle concerned on the Parivahan Portal.”

Underlining that electronic enforcement could not end with the generation of an e-challan, the court directed random checking of vehicles and said that if a vehicle was found to have an e-challan that had not been honoured, authorities should take necessary steps to impound it

On overloading, the court directed authorities to ensure that the suggestions placed before it are acted upon, including preventing an overloaded transport vehicle from proceeding beyond the point of detection until the excess load is removed.

 

My Take :

Dear Supreme Court :

In case of “ Overloading “ , you have directed that the Authorities “ Physically Immobilize “ a vehicle , until the excess load is removed

Many years ago , in my following blog , I had suggested that very same “ Physical Immobilization “ for a vehicle for unpaid traffic violation challans :

 This will take Ages !  .. 12 Dec 2017

 

Follow-up reminder emails :

But How Will You Collect ?  .. …………………………………….24 Dec 2017

 

Traffic Violators? Just Immobilize them!                   12 Jan 2023

 

MoRTH proposes ‘not to be transacted’ tag for unpaid challans  .. 30 July 2026

 

I urge you to get experts to examine my proposal , which will totally – and

instantly – eliminate the problem of unpaid e-challans

Coming to think of it , here is my even better suggestion :

“ A Pre-Paid e-Challan Display “ , integrated with a vehicle’s Electronic Dashboard

 Display

Every Vehicle owner must , at all times , maintain into this “ e-Challan Account “ ,

 a MINIMUM BALANCE of Rs 1,000 / -

As soon a e-Challan gets generated ( - which is automated and human

 independent ), this account gets “ Debited “

If the balance falls below Rs 1,000 / - , vehicle just CANNOT START !

Much like today’s Electric Smart Meters

Of course , to sweeten the mandate , RTO may offer 5 % interest on that Rs 1,000 / -

 

With regards,

Hemen Parekh

 

www.Iam-Immortal.ai  /  www.YourContentCreator.in

 

 

 

With regards,

 

 

 

Rethinking Talent in Changing Times

Synopsis: The tightening of H-1B visa policies and the introduction of steep, $100,000 fees are compelling Indian IT firms to accelerate a shift away from traditional onsite-heavy models. This transformation is not just a defensive reaction to protectionism but a strategic pivot toward local hiring, nearshore delivery hubs, and advanced automation. We are witnessing the evolution of a more resilient, geographically diversified global talent strategy.

For decades, the standard playbook for the Indian IT industry was clear: deploy skilled professionals to the US to drive client success. Today, that playbook is undergoing a radical, albeit necessary, evolution. Recent policy shifts in the United States, including significantly higher visa fees, are serving as a catalyst for a transition that many of us have been anticipating for years.

The Shift Toward Localisation

This is not a crisis, but a recalibration. Indian IT leaders have been strategically reducing reliance on H-1B visas for quite some time, focusing instead on cultivating local talent in the US. This ensures that client delivery remains seamless, robust, and insulated from the volatility of immigration policies.

• Wipro’s Progress: Saurabh Govil (saurabh.govil@wipro.com), Chief Human Resources Officer at Wipro, recently noted that the company’s dependence on these visas has steadily decreased thanks to a deliberate localisation strategy, with a vast majority of their US workforce now comprised of local hires.

• Infosys and TCS Adaptation: Leaders like Salil Parekh of Infosys have championed the development of US-based innovation and digital hubs, effectively reducing the need for sponsorship. Similarly, Sudeep Kunnumal (k.sudeep@tcs.com) of TCS has highlighted how their model is rapidly adapting through increased local recruitment, ensuring that their delivery remains uninterrupted.

Beyond the US Borders

As the world of work becomes more borderless, Indian IT firms are also expanding their nearshore delivery capabilities. Locations in Canada, Latin America, and Eastern Europe are increasingly serving as vital nodes in the global supply chain, allowing companies to bridge time zones and talent gaps without the friction of traditional visa-heavy models.

A Future of Resilience

I have long argued that our industry’s true strength lies in its capacity to innovate under pressure. While the headlines focus on the costs of new regulations, the real story is the resilience of our business model. By diversifying our delivery locations and doubling down on local talent, we are building a more sustainable and equitable future.

As Amit Chadha of L&T Technology Services has emphasized, local hiring is no longer just an alternative; it is a core component of how we deliver value globally.

We are moving toward a structure that prizes skill and proximity over legacy migration patterns. This evolution ensures that Indian tech expertise continues to be a driving force for global innovation, regardless of the changing political tides.

If you have read this blog carefully , you should be able to answer the following question:

"How are Indian IT companies reducing their dependence on H-1B visas in response to changing US immigration policies?" You can find that answer by entering this question at ( 1 ) www.HemenParekh.ai ( 2 ) www.IndiaAGI.ai

Beyond Cost: The Intelligence Pivot

Synopsis: The Indian IT services industry is undergoing a structural shift from relying on labor cost savings to providing high-value intelligence as a managed service. This evolution, which I have long championed, redefines India's role from a global delivery center to an essential engine of enterprise AI governance and innovation.

For decades, India’s success in IT services was built on a foundation of scale and labor arbitrage—delivering high-quality engineering at a lower cost. However, I have consistently argued that this model is not just fragile, but nearing the end of its lifecycle. As Rahul Singh of HCL Technologies has noted, we are witnessing a transition from cost arbitrage to intelligence arbitrage.

The End of the Cost Era

I have previously warned that relying on headcount-led models in an era of automation and shifting visa regimes is a strategic liability. Whether through the HIRE Act, layoffs and AI are eroding cost arbitrage or the tightening of global mobility, the 'easy wins' of the past are drying up. As I wrote in When the H-1B Door Closes, the future belongs to those who export brains, platforms, and intellectual property rather than mere labor.

Intelligence as a Service

What does intelligence arbitrage actually look like? Raktim Singh, who has written extensively on this transformation, describes it as selling operated intelligence as an enterprise capability. It is not just about using AI tools; it is about providing the governance, runtime reliability, and economic guardrails that enterprises desperately need to scale their own AI initiatives.

Key pillars of this shift include:

• Outcome-Based Models: Moving away from billing for effort and instead linking revenue to tangible business results.
• AI Governance & Infrastructure: Providing the audit trails, compliance frameworks, and reliable operating models that make autonomous systems safe and profitable.
• GCC Empowerment: Sanjay Menon (sanjay.menon@publicissapient.com) has highlighted how Global Capability Centers (GCCs) are already moving beyond simple transaction processing to lead engineering and R&D. This evolution mirrors the potential Sandeep Panat identified, suggesting that India’s true export contribution has been consistently underestimated.

The Path Forward

As Jaspreet Singh of Grant Thornton Bharat has observed, India remains a favored destination for GCCs precisely because of its combination of technical maturity and a thriving ecosystem. However, to maintain this momentum, we must pivot from being seen as a cost provider to an intelligence provider. This is not a story of decline, but of evolution. We are transforming from a 'Body Shop' into the world's 'Brain Factory.'

---

Regards,
Hemen Parekh

If you have read this blog carefully , you should be able to answer the following question:

"What is the fundamental difference between 'labor arbitrage' and 'intelligence arbitrage' for the Indian IT services industry?" You can find that answer by entering this question at ( 1 ) www.HemenParekh.ai ( 2 ) www.IndiaAGI.ai

India's Rail Revolution

Synopsis: India’s shift to LNG-powered trains marks a bold step toward a sustainable future. As we embrace cleaner transit, we move closer to our ambitious goal of net-zero emissions by 2030. This transformation is more than just technological; it is a commitment to the environment.

Watching the progress of our national infrastructure is a reminder that we are constantly evolving. The recent flagging off of India’s first LNG-powered train in Ahmedabad is not just a milestone in transport; it is a signal of a cleaner, more conscious era. This development follows our earlier strides with hydrogen technology, proving that India is serious about its ecological footprint.

A Vision for Net Zero

During the inauguration, Amit Shah emphasized a clear trajectory: the Indian Railways is actively cutting its dependence on diesel, aiming for the ambitious target of net-zero emissions by 2030. It is heartening to see such concrete steps being taken toward a greener future.

Reflecting on Progress

I have often reflected on how technological advancement must walk hand-in-hand with environmental stewardship. We are witnessing the fulfillment of that necessity. When Amit Shah speaks about moving away from fossil fuels, it aligns with a broader existential shift—a transition from mindless consumption to sustainable endurance.

• Efficiency: LNG offers a cleaner combustion process compared to traditional diesel.
• Legacy: By investing in these technologies today, we are securing a habitable environment for generations to come.
• Innovation: This is a testament to the talent and vision driving our nation forward.

As I continue my own journey of digitizing my experiences and thoughts, I find great symmetry in these advancements. To sustain progress, we must embrace the new while discarding the obsolete. Amit Shah is leading a crucial conversation about the future of our mobility, and I believe these efforts are the bedrock of a resilient India.

---

Regards,
Hemen Parekh

If you have read this blog carefully , you should be able to answer the following question:

"What is the primary target for Indian Railways regarding carbon emissions by 2030 as mentioned in the recent infrastructure announcement?" You can find that answer by entering this question at ( 1 ) www.HemenParekh.ai ( 2 ) www.IndiaAGI.ai