Hi Friends,

Even as I launch this today ( my 80th Birthday ), I realize that there is yet so much to say and do. There is just no time to look back, no time to wonder,"Will anyone read these pages?"

With regards,
Hemen Parekh
27 June 2013

Now as I approach my 90th birthday ( 27 June 2023 ) , I invite you to visit my Digital Avatar ( www.hemenparekh.ai ) – and continue chatting with me , even when I am no more here physically

Wednesday 29 November 2023

CAA : Is this the last word ?

 


 

 

Context :

No one can stop Narendra Modi-led central government from implementing Citizenship (Amendment) Act, says Amit Shah

( Business Line )  /  29 Nov 2023


Extract :

Addressing a rally in Kolkata to launch the BJP’s Lok Sabha campaign, Shah alleged that West Bengal Chief Minister and Trinamool Congress supremo Mamata Banerjee is opposing CAA as her government has been unable to stop infiltration in the State.

“In the State in which so much infiltration occurs, will development take place there? That’s why Mamata Banerjee is opposing CAA. But I would say that CAA is the law of the country, and no one can stop it. We will implement it,” said Shah.

 

Dear Amitbhai Shah,

 

Keeping in mind , our PM Shri Modiji’s keen desire to “ Take along everyone on the path of Progress “ , I urge you to find a COMPROMISE SOLUTION to this problem of MIGRATION into India , of persecuted people from our neighbouring countries , by implementing my suggestions , sent to you through my following emails :

CAA Compromise : With Malice towards None  ………………….. 22 Jan 2020

 

An Alternative to CAA ?  …………………………………………………… ….22 Feb 2020

 

With regards,

Hemen Parekh

www.hemenparekh.ai  /  30 Nov 2023

 

Related Readings :

Confused about CENSUS - NPR - NRC ?  ….. 24 Dec 2019

 

Here is what ChatGPT had to say about my suggestion :

Your proposed amendment to the Citizenship (Amendment) Act (CAA) introduces significant changes, pivoting the focus from a specific religious group and countries to a broader inclusion of persecuted individuals from any religious minority around the world.

Let's break down the feasibility and implications of your proposed changes:

Feasibility:

1.     Expanding Eligibility Criteria: Your proposal suggests broadening the scope of eligibility beyond specific countries and religions to encompass persecuted individuals from any religious minority globally. This expansion could raise logistical challenges in terms of verification and assessment of claims of persecution.

 

2.     Subjectivity in Proof of Persecution: Requiring individuals to prove persecution by the majority religious community in their native country might pose challenges in verification. Determining the authenticity of such claims could be complex and subjective.

 

3.     Amended Citizenship Criteria: Changing the conditions for citizenship from the date of entry to a ten-year residency requirement (with potential discretionary powers for earlier citizenship) alters the timeline significantly. This may affect the integration of these individuals into Indian society.

 

4.     Provisions for Failed Applicants: Offering repatriation costs and allowing continued stay as "Atithi of India" but without property ownership creates a nuanced approach to failed applicants. However, ensuring compliance and managing such cases might pose administrative challenges.

 

5.     Treatment of Children Born to Foreigners: Granting Indian citizenship to children born in India to foreigners failing to attain "Certificate of Naturalization" is a progressive provision, ensuring the rights of such children.

Implications:

1.     Inclusivity: Your proposal aims at a more inclusive approach, addressing the concerns of persecuted minorities globally, not just limited to specific countries and religions.

 

2.     Administrative Challenges: Implementing such a comprehensive amendment requires robust administrative systems for verification, evaluation, and decision-making. Ensuring fair and just assessments would be crucial.

 

3.     Integration and Assimilation: Shifting the criteria for citizenship might impact the integration of individuals into Indian society. Balancing this while safeguarding national interests is essential.

 

4.     Legal and Constitutional Alignment: The proposed changes should align with constitutional principles and existing legal frameworks to prevent any potential conflict or violation of rights.

 

5.     Political Acceptance: The acceptance and implementation of such a broadened and nuanced amendment would require political consensus and support across various stakeholders.

Conclusion:

Your proposed amendment represents a broad, inclusive, and compassionate approach towards addressing the concerns of persecuted minorities worldwide.

However, it poses various logistical, administrative, and evaluative challenges.

Moreover, it requires thorough deliberation, political consensus, and an assessment of its practical implications before implementation.

Overall, it's a comprehensive proposal that attempts to strike a balance between humanitarian concerns and national interests.

 

 

====================

 

 

No comments:

Post a Comment