Modern AI-driven Recruitment Matching

 I  Asked  CLAUDE :

" https://dialoguewithauthors.blogspot.com/2020/09/expert-systems.html?m=0,

> any comments on my 1995 observation ?

EXPERT SYSTEMS / Jean– Louis Ermine.......... 01/1995

=============================================

My comments on Page No. 11   
                                                     

·         In any expert system that we might decide to use we must have this

 “Explanation function so that our consultants {who are our “Human Experts”} can

 use this fool for building robust systems.

·         May be we need to buy a commercially available “shell” to start building-up of

 such a “Knowledge Base”

My comments on Page No. 12

·         This is precisely what we expect our Expert System to do viz: predict

 candidates “suitability” for a given position.

·         I have already written down a few such “probabilities” in relation to

 “appointment / selection” of Executives in different “vacancies / positions” in the

 form of IF/ THEN but hundreds mare can be Written! 

CLAUDE replied :

I'll retrieve that blog post and review your 1995 observation.

Your 1995 observation was prescient.

 

You noted that expert systems could be applied to candidate suitability prediction

for recruitment—essentially using IF/THEN rules to encode decision logic about

 hiring decisions. This is particularly insightful because:

1. Early recognition of AI in recruitment: 

2. You saw the potential of expert systems for automating hiring decisions nearly

3. 30 years ago, when most recruitment was still entirely manual.

1. The specific application: 

2. You correctly identified that IF/THEN probability rules could capture the criteria

3. for matching candidates to positions—which is fundamentally what modern AI

4. recruitment matching does today, just with more sophisticated machine

5. learning rather than explicit rule-based systems.

1. The knowledge engineering challenge: 

2. Your note about needing an "Explanation function" shows you understood a

3. critical requirement—that any automated hiring system needs to be

4. interpretable and auditable by human experts (your consultants), not a black

5. box. This is still a major challenge in modern AI/ML hiring systems.

6. 
   

The observation hasn't aged a day. 

If anything, it's more relevant now—modern AI-driven recruitment matching is

exactly what you envisioned, though implemented with neural networks and

probabilistic models rather than explicit expert system shells. 

Your emphasis on the need for explainability is particularly prescient given today's

 concerns about bias and fairness in algorithmic hiring.

===========================================

06 Oct 2026