Hi Friends,

Even as I launch this today ( my 80th Birthday ), I realize that there is yet so much to say and do. There is just no time to look back, no time to wonder,"Will anyone read these pages?"

With regards,
Hemen Parekh
27 June 2013

Now as I approach my 90th birthday ( 27 June 2023 ) , I invite you to visit my Digital Avatar ( www.hemenparekh.ai ) – and continue chatting with me , even when I am no more here physically

Saturday, 20 February 2021

Kisan Sabha gets Constructive

 


 

Context :

AIKS floats model bill on crop support price    /   Business Line  /  20 Feb 2021

Extract :

Maintaining that a law to ensure Minimum Support Price at 50 per cent above cost of production (C2+50 per cent) is possible, the All India Kisan Sabha has come up with a model Bill to ensure fair and remunerative price for farm produce.

The AIKS hopes to get the Bill into Parliament as a private member’s Bill during the second part of the budget session

The Bill suggests,

Ø  creation of social cooperatives of workers and peasants,

Ø  which will supply agricultural products based on the quality standards ,

Ø  to the “ Primary Agricultural Self Help Groups

Ø  at MSP which is not less than C2 + 50 per cent.

 

It also recommends

Ø  A scheme to share certain fixed percentage of the surplus income earned by marketing the value-added products processed out of the primary agricultural products as additional price to the farmers.

Ø  It will be calculated according to the proportion of the quantity of products supplied to the social cooperatives and additional wages to the workers involved in the production network.

Self Help Groups

 

Self Help Groups can be formed with the approval and under the direction of the respective ‘Block Agricultural Social Co-operative Processing and Marketing Centre’ comprising of not less than twenty and not more than forty farmers and agriculture workers residing in the designated local bodies and engaged in farming.

The model Bill also proposes establishment of Price Stabilisation Fund (PSF) with the contribution of member farmers and others and the support of various schemes of the Centre and State Governments, interest free loans from the financial institutions with government guarantee and share from the surplus income of the social cooperatives.

“The PSF can develop as self-reliant fund from the share of surplus created out of the income from the processed, value added consumer products and extend assistance for developing crop insurance and compensation schemes to all member farmers,” the Bill said. It says procurement of agricultural products at rates lower than MSP should be treated as an offence.

Existing formula

 

“A system of authority to monitor and fix Minimum Support Price to all crops from time to time shall be ensured,” the Bill said.

Releasing the draft Bill, AIKS leaders Hannan Mollah and Ashok Dhawle said,

Ø  the existing rate of MSP based on A2+FL calculation (actual paid out cost plus imputed value of family labour) is not remunerative and

Ø  according to reports only six per cent of the farm produce based on the estimate of Gross Value Added has been procured by the governments by providing this meager MSP.

 

 “Hence huge majority of the farmers are forced to sell far below support price, making MSP only notional for the vast majority,” they said.

Mollah and Dhawle added that

Ø  the benefit of surplus created out of value addition of farm produce is amassed by the corporate companies.

They cited the example of Basmati rice and said ,

Ø  while farmers get ₹18 to ₹ 30 per kilo from the intermediaries for Basmati paddy, branded Basmati is sold at about ₹ 208 per kilo.

Ø  “This sort of loot and exploitation by the corporate sector and their intermediaries in the market is one of the main reasons for the widespread indebtedness of the peasant households and the resultant massive peasant suicides.

Ø  Every hour two farmers are committing suicide in India and 2,468 farmers per day are forced to give up agriculture,” they said.

===================================================

In my following earlier e-mail , I had suggested a somewhat similar provision :

Selling Farm Laws before selling Farm Crops …………………………….[ 24 Sept 2020 ]

 

Extact :

Dear Shri Tomarji 

nstomaroffice@gmail.com / ns.tomar@sansad.nic.in ],

I am sure those farmer organizations would send their delegates to meet you. When they do, I request you to consider telling them following :

Ø   As it is, farm income is already exempt from Income Tax. 

 To enable rapid adoption of CONTRACT FARMING, we will exempt the “Profit “ that a Company will make

  by “ Value Added through Processing “,of farm produce purchased by entering into CONTRACT

  FARMING 

 This provision will be for 5 years and will encourage thousands of Companies to enter into CONTRACT

 FARMING  agreements with farmers.

This will expand the market and bring in COMPETITION among these Corporate Buyers, leading to higher prices for the farmers

 

Ø  On the existing Govt portal ( e-NAM ), we will introduce a section called CONTRACT FARMING,

         where the farmers desirous of entering into contract farming agreements,

         will submit their full details

             #  Name / Farm Size / Location of farm / main crops / past yields per

                  acre / no of workers / family members engaged / existing

                  loan  liabilities / water availability etc )

                       

                 

Ø  Companies on look-out for CONTRACT FARMING can search this database ( of course , after due registration with full details of the Company ) and shortlist / select potential farmers and send them their “ Purchase Proposal “ ( by filling in an Online Standard Form ).

Ø  Central Government would have full access to these contracts entered Online  between the parties and ensure that no contract is entered into below the MSP for the concerned crop

 

Ø   No one else can see these contracts but the parties concerned would have a provision to EDIT these

 

Ø  This will enable the Govt to know the INPUT COST for the “ Contracting Company “ , and link it with the “ Profit made through Processing Value addition “, in order to grant tax exemption described earlier

          ==================================================

Dear Shri Tomarji,


For past 3 months, Kisan Unions were merely criticizing the FARM LAWS – and demanding repeal, without suggesting WHAT SPECIFIC ALTERNATE clauses they wanted introduced in these laws


Now All India Kisan Sabha ( AIKS ) has gone, more than a step forward and decided to introduce a entirely NEW BILL ( - to override, the existing ones )


That puts the ball in your court. This proposed bill opens up a new door for a dialogue in the spirit of “Give & Take “


Now, it is up to you to introduce AMENDMENTS – sharply worded, specific amendments – and refer the bill to the SELECT COMMITTEE.


In my earlier mail, I had proposed :


Ø  Incentivizing the FOOD PROCESSORS ( Companies making “ VALUE ADDITION by PROCESSING “ ) by tax-exempting their “ AMOUNT of PROFIT “ solely made through processing of Agro-crops obtained through CONTRACT FARMING only ( - and not through processing of agro-crops freely purchased in Mandies )

My idea was to increase many fold, value-addition of agri-crops by  “ incentivizing “ food-processors



As against this , AIKS wants that ,


Ø  share certain fixed percentage of the surplus income earned by marketing the value-added products processed out of the primary agricultural products as additional price to the farmers


Ø   the benefit of surplus created out of value addition of farm produce must not be amassed by the corporate companies.


Ø  Instead of solely “ incentivizing “ the corporate ( as suggested by me ) , through sharing of “ Surplus Income Earned “ , we should  “ motivate “ the farmers to come forward in a big way , to cooperate / collaborate with the FOOD PROCESSORS


If , as suggested by AIKS , an iron-clad / foolproof  method ( of sharing of “ SURPLUS INCOME through FOOD PROCESSING “ with the farmers ) can be put in place, I believe, it will find much better acceptance among farmers ( as compared to my suggestion , which may have a simpler operating mechanism , but may smack of crony-capitalism )



Dear Shri Tomarji ,

I urge you to approach AIKS proposal with an OPEN MIND


With regards,

Hemen Parekh  /  hcp@RecruitGuru.com  /   21 Feb 2021

===================================================

CC : All India Kisan Sangarsh Coordination Committee ( AIKSCC ) – Members

===================================================

Akhil Gogoi

Krishak Mukti Sangram Samiti (KMSS)

secretarykmss@gmail.com

Dr Ashish Mittal

All India Kisan Mazdoor Sabha (AIKMS)

aikms.cec@gmail.com

Atul Kumar Anjaan

All India Kisan Sabha (AIKS)

atulanjaan@gmail.com

Avik Saha

Jai Kisan Andolan (JKA)

avik@saharay.com

Dr Darshan Pal

Bhartiya Kisan Union (BKU Dakaunda)

darshanpal1@gmail.com

Hannan Mollah

All India Kisan Sabha (AIKS Canning Street)

mollah.hannan@gmail.com

Kavitha Kuruganti

Alliance for Sustainable & Holistic Agriculture (ASHA)

kavitakuruganti@gmail.com

Kiran Vissa

Rythu Swarajya Vedika (RSV)

kiranvissa@gmail.com

K. Chandrasekhar

Karnataka Rajya Raitha Sangha (KRRS)

kodihallichandrashekar@gmail.com

Medha Patkar

National Alliance for People’s Movements (NAPM)

medha.narmada@gmail.com

P. Ayyakkanu

National-South India River Interlinking Agriculturists Association

Pratibha Shinde

Lok Sangharsh Morcha (LSM)

loksamanwaypratisthan@gmail.com

Raja Ram Singh

All India Kisan Mahasabha (AIKM)

rajaramsingh18@gmail.com

Raju Shetti

Swabhimani Shetkari Sanghtana (SSS)

rajushetti@gmail.com

Satyawan

All India Kisan Khet Mazdoor Sangathan (AIKKMS)

kisansangathan@gmail.com

Dr Sunilam

Kisan Sangharsh Samiti

samajwadisunilam@gmail.com

Tajinder Virk

Tarai Kisan Sangathan

tajindersamajwadi@gmail.com

VM Singh

Rashtriya Kisan Mazdoor Sangathan (RKMS)

vmsingh@vmsingh.com

Yogendra Yadav

Swaraj Abhiyan

yogendra.yadav@gmail.com

 

 

Friday, 19 February 2021

Better Late than Never ?

 


 

Context :

Electric vehicles usage should be made mandatory for all govt officials: Gadkari  /  ET /  20 Feb 2021

Extract :

Ø  Transport Minister Nitin Gadkari on Friday made a case for making it mandatory to use electric vehicles for all officials in government ministries and department. He also suggested that the government should give subsidy to buy electric cooking appliances instead of giving support for buying cooking gas to households.

Ø  Addressing at the launch Go Electric campaign, Gadkari said, " Why don't we provide subsidy on electric cooking appliances. We already provide subsidy on cooking gas. “

Ø  He was of the view that electricity cooking is clean and will also reduce import dependence for gas.

Gadkari suggested that use of electric vehicles should be made mandatory for all government officials.

Ø  He, further, urged Power Minister R K Singh to make is mandatory to use electric vehicles for officials in his department saying he will do so for his departments.

He said that use of 10,000 electric vehicles in Delhi can alone save Rs 30 crore per month.

=================================================

Dear Shri Nitinbhai,

 

No doubt you are aware that state-owned EESL had placed an order for 10,000 Electric Cars on TATA and M&M, some 3 years back . In turn, EESL had planned to sell these cars to various Govt departments


These cars ( costing Approx Rs 12 lakh each ) were to be delivered within ONE year. Within a few months, ( after delivery of a few cars ), a lot of controversy arose ( in respect of poor performance ) and the order was cancelled . Then, about an year back, EESL placed a small order for a Foreign EV costing Rs 22 lakh . No news about that


Last week, I saw a Youtube video showing TATA Sanand plant rolling off TATA TIGOR EV ( small order for 150 cars  / selling for Rs 10.6 lakhs ? ) for delivery to EESL


May be EESL guys are saying :  Better LATE then NEVER


But over the past 3 years, I have sent following e-mails ( to EESL ), urging it to say : 

Better LEASE than BUY


( Refer : EESL has plans to replace the government’s 5,00,000 conventional internal combustion engine (ICE) cars with electric variants  )

 

 Question :

How much time (and perseverance) does it take to get across your point to the Authorities ?


Answer :

In this case, 36 months , starting with my first E Mail ( suggesting “ Wet Lease “ ) , on 16 Aug 2017


I hope Shri Gadkariji succeeds in convincing EESL about WET LEASE saving thousands of crores every year

 

Here are links to all the E Mails ( sent to Cabinet ministers / State CMs / NITI Aayog / EESL / BMC etc ) :


2017 ( 3 )

EESL : Lease cars , do not Buy ! ………………………………………[ 16 Aug 2017 ]

Waiting to be proved wrong ! …………………………………………….[ 30 Sept 2017 ]

To Buy or not to Buy ?                                                   [ 11  Oct  2017  ]

 2018 ( 15 )

Logical to Lease …………………………………………………………………..[ 06 March 2018 ]

Scam ? #EESL #NDA #BJP #MNRE ……………………………………[ 08 March 2018 ]

Buy or Lease ? ………………………………………………………………………[ 03 April 2018 ]

Do  they  have  an  option ?                                             [ 14 April 2018 ]

#EV #ElectricVehicles #FAME ………………………………………………[ 09 May 2018 ]

#EV #ElectricVehicles #EESL #WetLease…………………………….[ 13 May 2018 ]

Connecting the News………………………………………………………………[ 18 June 2018 ]

#EESL #EV #ElectricCars ………………………………………………………[ 27 June 2018 ]

 EESL : Grab this chance !................................................[ 01 Aug 2018 ]

 EESL : Put it off indefinitely !                                              [ 19 Aug 2018 ]

 EESL : Getting Away from Straitjacket ?                              [ 26 Aug 2018 ]

 If China can , so can We                                                     [ 27 Aug 2018 ]

 Cars on Subscription ? Convenience Redefined                      [ 10 Sept 2018 ]

 EESL : It is your move now !                                               [ 12  Oct  2018 ]

 Thank You , Shri Jaitleyji,                                                    [ 25 Dec 2018 ]

 2019 ( 2 )

Thank You , Shri Bagde  …………………………………………………………….[ 27 Feb 2019 ]

E- Bus : without ETA [ Expected Time of Arrival ] ?                 [ 04  Apr  2019 ]

 2020 ( 1 )

BEST poised to get BETTER ? …………………………………………………….[ 24 Aug 2020 ]

===================================================


Dear Shri Gadkariji,


Your logic for subsidizing purchase of ELECTRIC COOKING APPLIANCES, is impeccable !


Here too, my ( so far unsuccessful ) efforts to persuade the Govt Policy Makers, start with the following e–mails :


Solar  Chula  ?  Some  Unanswered  Questions ………………… [ 03 Nov 2017 ]

Solar Chulha : Where can I buy ? ………………………………………..[ 16 July 2018 ]

 Dear Shri Goyalji : How about a Solar Cooker ?  ………………… [ 26 Aug 2020 ]

===================================================


Time to " Talk the Walk "…………………………………………………………[ 19 Sept 2020 ]



Extract :

 

Dear Shri R K Singhji

Just came across :


https://lnkd.in/e6xiYeZ

where you said :


" Electricity is future of India / most of its infrastructure will be powered by electricity, including cooking completely on electricity, giving poor strata of society a cheaper medium of cooking.. a POWER FOUNDATION is being set up under the Ministry for the purpose. large scale use of electric cooking will make the economy self-reliant "



Pl consider following suggestion
: 

Dear Shri Goyalji : How about a Solar Cooker ?  ……[ 26 Aug 2020 ]

 


How can Govt help to accelerate a RAPID ADOPTION of Solar Cookers ?

By providing a DBT of 75 % of the Sale Price of a Solar Cooker (meeting specific performance criteria and having obtained a prior ISI certificate), into the Jan Dhan A/C of the buyer ( subject to max of Rs 7,500 )

This subsidy would be available to a HOUSE-HOLD(and not to each person in the family ), and can be availed only ONCE per family


Subsidy would be available for only DIRECT PURCHASE from govt approved Authorized Dealers – and not from Re-Sellers

===================================================

 Not in one day : What about 3 years ? …………………………………[ 25 Oct 2020 ]

 

Extract :

Let us focus on just one cause of air pollution – specifically INDOOR ( household ) air pollution caused by cooking , using wood / cow-dung cakes etc


Above report says this has considerably come down due to implementation of :

Pradhan Mantri Ujwala Yojana Household LPG “ programme


At what ( recurring ) cost ?


Take a look :

No DBT on subsidised LPG for 3 months due to favourable oil market   /  July 28 , 2020


Extract :

Ø  Under the direct benefit transfer scheme (DBT), the government provides subsidy on 12 cylinders a household uses in a year. While consumers buy cooking gas at market rates, the calculated subsidy amount is transferred directly into their accounts.

    The government has allocated Rs 40,915 crore as petroleum subsidy for FY21, a 6 per cent increase from Rs 38,569 crore allocated for the last fiscal

 

Ø  Out of this the allocation for LPG subsidy has been increased to Rs 37,256.21 crore for current year.


    Now take a look at the following figures :


Ø  Total No of Households in India……………………….   27 Crore ( 270 million )

Ø  Poor Households covered by Ujwalla Scheme…     8 Crore  (  80 million )


Ø  Increase in LPG Consumption ( 2014 > 2019 )..  56 %


Ø  Import of LPG ( in Aug 2020 )………………………………  1.24 million tons

Ø  LNG import in 2019-20…………33,680 (MMSCM) ( $9.5 billion= Rs 70024 crore )

=====================================================

MY TAKE :


Ø  Allocation of Rs 37,256 crore for LPG subsidy ( for cooking ), is an ANNUAL RECURRING expense


Ø  If household cooking was to be based on use of a SOLAR CHULHA ( Stove ), then no need for LPG !


Ø  Some 3 years ago, IIT-B won a competition for design of a Solar Cooking Stove


Ø  Govt had specified its max “ Sale Price” at Rs 10,000 /- per Stove [ $ 135 ]


Ø  For Rs 37,256 Crore , govt can buy and distribute ( FREE ), some 3.7 cr ( 37 million ) solar stoves


Ø  Within about 2 years, Govt can handover a SOLAR STOVE to all households covered by Ujwalla Scheme


Ø  Of course , since food gets cooked even when there is NO SUNSHINE , each Solar Stove would require Tesla’s  POWERWALL type of Storage device


in which PM Shri Modi had shown keen interest during his visit to TESLA factory in 2015 )


Ø  If my suggestion gets implementedcountry would save annually , foreign exchange worth Rs 37,256 Cr

=====================================================

With regards,

Hemen Parekh  /  hcp@RecruitGuru.com  /  20 Feb 2021

CC :

cmd@ongc.co.in 

min.png@nic.in /  d.pradhan@sansad.nic.in

registrar@nitkkr.ac.in

registrar@bmsce.ac.in

 sudesh@iitb.ac.in

jay.venkateswaran@gmail.com

 ncnsolar@gmail.com

chetanss@iitb.ac.in