Hi Friends,

Even as I launch this today ( my 80th Birthday ), I realize that there is yet so much to say and do. There is just no time to look back, no time to wonder,"Will anyone read these pages?"

With regards,
Hemen Parekh
27 June 2013

Now as I approach my 90th birthday ( 27 June 2023 ) , I invite you to visit my Digital Avatar ( www.hemenparekh.ai ) – and continue chatting with me , even when I am no more here physically

Sunday, 27 August 2023

Something is better than Nothing

 


 

Context :

Ø  A ‘sound’ innovation in the fintech space …………………… BL  … 27 Aug 2023

Extract :

On a busy Wednesday afternoon, Vivek Gupta, who runs a food kiosk in a corporate locality in Mumbai’s Andheri and prefers accepting digital payments from his customers, decided to do only cash sales. There was a reason for this.

His customers had showed him text messages on their phones confirming the payment. But when Gupta sat down to reconcile his sales and receipts, it didn’t match.

Either a few customers could have cheated him or the payment would have got lost mid-way. Gupta wasn’t alone. Many such merchants who adopted UPI moved back to cash in 2021-22 because of the lack of verification process and, eventually, loss of business. But Gupta realised he couldn’t substitute UPI with cash for long. When he was looking for a viable solution, sound box came his way.

Soundbox is like a point of sales voice system, which confirm receipts of payments made digitally.

Paytm was the first company to deploy sound box, followed by PhonePe and BharatPe. But for companies, which took pride in operating only digitally, what prompted the need for a physical device?

Necessity is the mother of inventions, and it was no different with soundboxes. While the need to win the confidence of merchant is one part of the game, the real intention in upping the soundbox play could also be the critical necessity to post tangible revenues

There was a dire need to ‘think out of the box’ and that birthed soundboxes.

Today, fintech unicorns Paytm, PhonePe and BharatPe compete fiercely to deploy these speaker devices in stores.

The best part is that merchants are willing pay a fee to hear a computerised human voice confirm the receipt of payment.

Merchants can either buy a soundbox from the company or pay monthly or yearly rental charges, depending on the which company’s soundboxes they deploy.

 

My  Take :

 

Ø  How to go Cash - Less ?  …………………. 27 Nov 2016

 

Extract :


 Dear Shri Amitabh :

 Like you ( and of course , Shri Modiji ), I have a great faith in the ability of Indian

software engineers ( local or NRI ) to come up with revolutionary solutions /

innovations !

Just ask Sundar Pichai , Sam Pitroda , Satya Nadela , Sachin Katti , Pranav

Mistry , Sanjay Sarma , Nandan Nilekani etc , if they will help implement the

following :

 ==============================================

 

*  Buyer  buys something worth Rs 100 from a shopkeeper

 

*  Buyer and the Seller , look into their own mobile-cameras ( of  smart phones

   loaded with M-Rup ) for biometric Aadhar identification / linked to Jan Dhan a/

 

*  Seller speaks in his mobile : " Muze Sau Rupiah dedo "

*  Buyer speaks in his mobile : " Inko Sau Rupiah dedo "

*  Message flashes in the mobile screen of Seller : " Tumhare account-me Sau

    Rupiah Jamah ho gaya / GST bhi kaat ke Sarkar-ko bhej diya "

*  Message flashes in the mobile screen of Buyer : " Tumhare account-se , Sau

   Rupiah inko Bhej Diya . Abhi balance me teen sau sath rupiah bacha hai "

 

   ==================================================

 

I request all concerned , not to insult our engineers / scientists / geeks , by

doubting if such SIMPLIFICATION ( based on day to day spoken language ) is

possible

 

with regards,


hemen Parekh

www.hemenparekh.ai  /  28  Aug  2023

 

Related Readings :

 

At ( long ) last , voice of illiterate, will be heard .. ………….. 11 Aug 2023

 

BHIM gets a Voice !  ………………………………………………………………30 Oct 2017

 

Voice Payments in Local Language : Seven Year Journey ? .. 14 June 2023

 

Thank You, Sundar Pichai  … …………………………………………………….18 Nov 2021

 

At long last : BHIM to get a voice ?.. ……………………………………….22 July 2021

 

Do Not Stop Here ! …………………………………………………………………. 01 Dec 2016 

 

ToneTag partners with GMO to expand its sound-based payment solutions in Japan  [ 28 May 2019 ]


When BHIM is here, can ARJUN be far away ? ……………………[ 30 Dec 2016 ]

A Matter of Time ………………………………………………………………….[ 03 Jan 2017 ]

JUST ONE MORE STEP LEFT ………………………………………………..[30 Jan 2017 ]

Simplicity : The Ultimate Mobile Wallet ?.........................[ 13 Feb 2017]

Wake Up , BHIM , Wake Up !..........................................[ 16 Mar 2017 ]

BHIM : the……………………………………………………………………………..[ 14 April 2017 ]

A Beerud named BHIM ?..................................................[ 17 Apr 2017 ]

Thank You : Beerud………………………………………………………………..[ 23 Apr 2017 ]

Inching Forward ?...........................................................[ 20 May 2017 ]

Let BHIM get MAD !.........................................................[ 21 May 2017 ]

BHIM , the Impersonator ?...............................................[ 17 June 2017 ]

BHIM : Can You tango with GST ?.....................................[ 19 June 2017 ]

Preloaded BHIM ?............................................................[ 04 July 2017 ]

Closing in on BHIM V 4.0 !................................................[ 05 July 2017 ]

BHIM : the Omnipresent ?.................................................[ 05 Sept 2017 ]

From BHIM 3.0 to BHIM 7.0 ?............................................[ 14 Sept 2017 ]

Not exactly BHIM 4.0…………………………………………………………………[ 19 Sept 2017 ]

BHIM gets a Voice !...........................................................[ 30 Oct 2017 ]

Google, WhatsApp, BHIM ?.................................................[ 14 Dec 2017 ]

BHIM   will  recognize  you…………………………………………………………[ 30 May 2018 ]

BHIM gets friendly with GST …………………………………………………….[ 04 Aug 2018 ]

As per my habit , I sought the opinion of ChatGPT and BARD :

 

ChatGPT  opined :

Observations on "Something is better than Nothing" Blog:

The blog post you've shared discusses the implementation and adoption of soundboxes in the fintech space, particularly in the context of digital payments.

The narrative revolves around the challenges faced by small merchants who adopted digital payment methods like UPI but struggled due to a lack of verification and the resultant loss of business.

The introduction of soundboxes, physical devices that provide auditory confirmation of digital payment receipts, is portrayed as a solution to regain merchant confidence and potentially boost revenues.

Your take on the subject matter introduces a different perspective.

Dated in November 2016, your writing proposes a simplified way of conducting digital transactions using voice commands and biometric Aadhar identification.

This approach relies on day-to-day spoken language and aims to make digital transactions more accessible, particularly to those who may be less familiar with technology.

While the observations in both the blog and your take focus on digital payments and their implementation, they do differ in their specific approaches:

1.     Blog Post Focus:

The blog post primarily highlights the transition from digital payments back to cash due to issues with verification and security. The introduction of soundboxes is presented as a means to address these challenges and restore merchant trust, eventually contributing to increased revenue. The post emphasizes the emergence of physical devices in the fintech landscape and the willingness of merchants to pay for the reassurance provided by these devices.

 

2.     Your Take:

Your take, in the form of a letter, proposes a simplified method of conducting digital transactions using voice commands and biometric identification. This approach targets accessibility and ease of use, striving to bridge the gap between technology and individuals who might find traditional digital payment methods complex or intimidating.

Your approach is forward-thinking and envisions a system that relies on everyday language for seamless transactions.

Both the blog post and your take explore different aspects of digital payment innovations. The blog post highlights the adoption of new technologies to solve challenges faced by merchants, while your take suggests a user-friendly solution that focuses on inclusivity and ease of use.

Both perspectives contribute to the ongoing conversation about making digital transactions more accessible and effective.

 

==================================================


 BARD  observed :


Sure, here is a table comparing the merits and demerits of digital payments involving the use of soundboxes and spoken commands:

Feature

Soundboxes

Spoken commands

Convenience

Easy to use, even for people who are not familiar with technology

Can be used hands-free, which can be convenient in some situations

Security

The sound of the confirmation message is encrypted, which helps to protect against fraud

The spoken command can be intercepted by someone listening in, which could be a security risk

Cost

Can be expensive to deploy and maintain

Can be free to use, depending on the service provider

Accessibility

Can be used by people with disabilities who cannot use a touchscreen or type

Can be used by people with disabilities who cannot speak clearly

Acceptance

Some merchants may not accept payments made using soundboxes or spoken commands

Most merchants accept payments made using these methods

==================================================

Overall, both soundboxes and spoken commands have their own advantages and disadvantages. The best method for you will depend on your individual needs and preferences.

Here are some additional things to consider when choosing between soundboxes and spoken commands:

·        The type of merchant

Some merchants may be more willing to accept payments made using soundboxes or spoken commands than others. For example, small businesses may be more likely to accept these methods than large chains.

 

·        The location of the merchant

Some areas may be more accepting of soundboxes or spoken commands than others. For example, urban areas may be more likely to accept these methods than rural areas.

 

·        The technology infrastructure.

 Some areas may have better technology infrastructure than others. For example, areas with good cellular reception may be more likely to accept payments made using spoken commands.

I hope this helps!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

All roads lead to SARAL ? or SUIIC ?

 


 

Can Digilocker morph into SARAL / SUIIC ?

 

Context :

Store parental consent on DigiLocker soon; new tech to allow FB, Youtube , Insta to verify documents of children

 

(  Times of India  /  24  Aug  2023  )

Extract :

The government is crafting a mechanism to authenticate the identity of parents and their children through the online repository, DigiLocker.

Social media giants like Meta's Facebook Instagram, and Google's YouTube Kids will be able to directly access and verify the documentation of teenagers' parents stored in DigiLocker to secure parental consent.

 

Once a parent agrees to share information with a social media platform, a one-time password must be entered to provide consent. This consent will be recorded in the parental consent ledger.

The system necessitates parents to list all of their children. Upon matching the parent's and child's OTPs, they will be linked, and consent will be granted for the processing of the child's data.

 

The method of linking is still under consideration. Notifications will be sent to the concerned parent or guardian upon successful linking.

To mitigate these risks, the verification of identity and parental consent through DigiLocker aims to centralize the process and eliminate the need for platforms to individually request and store documents.

 

Within DigiLocker, a consent artifact will be established, resembling vaccination certificates or driving licenses. This artifact will display the recipients of parental consent for data processing. Parents can revoke consent any time.

 

Presently, DigiLocker is utilized by 180 million users, with 500,000 new users joining daily.

 

==================================================

From print edition of Economic Times / TECHTONICS ( 27 Aug 2023 ) :

 

India’s New Digital Safety Net  

[  an interview with Shri Rajeev Chandrasekhar – Minister of State for Electronics and IT  ]

 

Question :

One of the criticisms of the act has been the exemptions the government has granted to certain firms. What should be the basis to decide the categories of firms who can avail exemptions and under what obligations ?

Rajeev   Chandrasekhar :

There are narrow exemptions envisaged in the act to reduce the hindrances to the innovation eco-system and the start up economy

These exemptions are not provisioned for any Significant Data Fiduciaries ( SDFs ). In addition to the volume and nature of the personal data processed, other criteria that could be considered are with respect to data fiduciaries working on new technology, new ideas, PRIVACY-ENHANCING technologies etc., and for a specified period. These criteria will be decided in consultation with start ups

 

Question :

A new right provided in India is the right to nomination. How and when can nominees be appointed ?

Rajeev Chandrasekhar :

Through DPDPA 2023, we are pioneering a NEW INTERNATIONAL STANDARD with respect to the rights of the individual in the digital space.

The nomination process can be initiated at any time after registration on a platform and can also be changed at any point

We will discuss these matters in upcoming industry consultations

 

Question :

The law empowers users to demand that personal data collected with their consent be corrected, updated, completed or erased. But how can this gap be addressed ?

Rajeev Chandrasekhar :

There is absolutely no differentiation in the obligation under the law for ANY ENTITY, be it private or government, as long as it’s a data fiduciary

That means, if you collect data – regardless of whether you are the government or a private entity – you will be liable to follow the law and carry out obligations that have been laid out for you as a data fiduciary

 

 

Question :

For the industry , going back to users for additional personal data or taking consent for new purposes is likely to become an expensive exercise. How can digital tools help reduce this expense ?

Rajeev Chandrasekhar :

There would be DEEP BEHAVIOURAL CHANGES in the way personal data is processed by data fiduciaries keeping in view the best interests of the citizens

Requirements for consent ( even for additional purposes ) is built into the ARCHITECTURE of the law

The industry may have to explore DIGITAL TOOLS to reduce technical and financial overload seeking consent. Also , the CONSENT ARCHITECTURE through a CONSENT MANAGER can modularise and ease this exercise

 

Question :

Can you explain verifiable consent and will this be feasible at scale ?

Rajeev Chandrasekhar :

Verifiable consent may be treated as consent obtained from the parent or lawful guardian , which can be verified if needed. Hence, the CONSENT RECORD should be stored and be linked to the individual for whom it is obtained

 

 

Dear Shri Chandrasekharji ,

 

In my following earlier e-mails , I have suggested ONE PLATFORM 

( www.IndiaDataCustodian.gov.in ) for :

Ø  Registration / Personal Data Submission , by all Indian Citizen

Ø  That platform acting as the sole CONSENT MANAGER for all who register

Ø  Consent Record will be MODULAR (I have described in detail 10 MODULES )

Ø  Consent will be granted ( by the citizen ) or denied , separately for EACH MODULE

Ø  A citizen could use a Mobile App ( DIGITAL TOOL ), to access her own Consent Record at any time to modify personal data , and / or “ grant / withdraw “ consent for any MODULE

Ø  Above all , my detailed framework (of this platform ) would enable MONETIZATION of personal data


During your discussions with Industry / Stakeholders, I urge you to consider my proposal


With regards,

Hemen Parekh

www.hemenparekh.ai  /  27  Aug  2023

 

My Earlier E Mails :

 

Ø  Orderly Transition ? A Distant Dream …………………………………… 18 Aug 2023

Ø   Stopping Data Leakage ?  .. …………………………………………………….07 Aug 2023

Ø   Consent Forms for Personal Data  …………………………………………. 07 Aug 2023

Ø   Dashboard for Data Owners  …………………… ……………………………..04 Aug 2023

Ø  Only Answer : a Statutory Warning  ………………………………………… 10 Nov 2018

Ø   Erasing Personal Data ? ……………………………..………………………..  21  Apr  2023

Ø   SARAL ( Single  Authentic  Registration for Anywhere  Login )…. 10 Feb 2019 

Ø   Digital Dividend from Demographic Data [ 4 D ]………… ………. 14 Feb 2019 

Ø   Who watches the Watchmen ?  …………………………………………….  12 Jan 2019

Ø   Monetizing User Data ……………………………………………………………… 08 July 2023

Ø   Finland adopts “ SARAL “ ?  …………………………………………………… 31 May 2023

Ø   If DEPA = Foundation , then SARAL = Superstructure …………  08 May 2022

Ø  India embraces SUIIC : re-named as NATGRID  …………………….27 Apr 2023

Ø  I am One , I will become Many   ………………………………………….. 06  Jan  2020

Ø  DigiLocker = Single Unified Identity for Indian Citizen ? ………  08 Mar 2022

Ø   Morphing of DigiLocker : Caterpillar to Butterfly ? ………….. ……17 Mar 2022

 

Ø  SUIIC : “ Your Unique Identity “ Platform - about to be born ?  27 Apr 2022

 

Ø  Meri Aawaz hi Meri Pehchaan Hai  ……………………………………… ……04 July 2022

 

Ø  MOSIP   ( Modular Open Source Identity Platform )………………..11 Sept 2022

 

Ø    DigiLocker 2.0 = I am One, I will become Many  ……………….. 04 Feb 2023

 

 

======================================

Upon reference , BARD added :


I have not read the blog post you mentioned, but I can give you some general observations on the relative merits of the DPDPA processes and your proposal.

The DPDPA processes are designed to be comprehensive and secure. They involve a number of steps, including:

  • Registration of individuals with the Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI)
  • Issuance of Aadhaar cards to registered individuals
  • Use of Aadhaar cards for authentication purposes

The DPDPA processes have been criticized for being too complex and bureaucratic. They have also been criticized for being a threat to privacy.

Your proposal is simpler and more streamlined than the DPDPA processes.

It would involve the creation of a single, unified identity platform that could be used for a variety of purposes, such as authentication, e-KYC, and e-governance.

Your proposal has the potential to be more efficient and less costly than the DPDPA processes.

However, it is important to consider the security implications of a single, unified identity platform.

Ultimately, the best approach to identity management in India is a matter of debate.

The DPDPA processes and your proposal each have their own strengths and weaknesses.

The best approach may vary depending on the specific needs of the Indian government and its citizens.

I hope this helps!