IoT ; IoV ; Cars Stealing Your Data

 

 

Two decades ago , Scott McNally said :

“ Privacy is dead . Get over it “

[  FIST  notwithstanding ?  ]

 

For past one decade , I have listed many examples to support his view point

We have been repeatedly told that Smart phones / Alexa / Google Assistant etc., “

 listen “ to our talks ( even when switched off ) , and transmit all of that "

 Personal Data “ to their manufacturers and umpteen other agencies

Now comes following news :

Your car may be listening, watching and collecting your data

Extract :

In-car internet is great. A car occupant can play a song, chat with a voice assistant or find directions to their destination with one click of a button.

But after reading the latest report by Mozilla Foundation on user data privacy in cars, one might rethink before switching on their in-built navigation system. We’re not being alarmists, but the report is sounding alarms left, right, and center.

The organization reviewed 25 car brands and their data collection policies and found that all of these brands are collecting more personal information about whoever sits in the car than is required.

Moreover, 84 percent of these brands say they can share your personal data with:

#   service providers,

#   data brokers, and

#   other businesses.

But shockingly, 19 of these brands (76 percent) say they can also sell your personal data.

My  Take :

 

 Internet of Vehicles ( IoV ) ?....................... [  04  Mar  2017  ]

 

Extract :

 

Exactly what we need – and NOW  !

I expect that , over the next 5 years , all of these will converge into an Internet of

Vehicles ( IoV ), when :

 

Ø  Most vehicles will  be electric ( essentially , “ computers on wheels “ ),

    automatically determining the best / shortest, route / stops and optimizing

   vehicle  performance.  Mobile Apps will be a governing device

            

 

Ø  Vehicles will be internet connected with one another , exchanging data

 

Ø  Vehicles will be internet connected with servers of Transport Authorities / Traffic

    Police / Pollution Control Boards and a host of other governmental /

    institutional organizations, and be relaying all sorts of data  24*7

                       

 

Ø  Vehicles will report accidents ( being hit ) and thefts ( being stolen ) , on their

    own !

 

Ø  All vehicles will carry a whole lot of “ Sensors “ , which will continuously

    “ monitor “ the conditions of the vehicles and relay the same to all the

     authorities

 

     

Ø  All vehicles will be equipped with RADAR – LIDAR –CAMERAS – GPS locators – /

   Augmented Reality  etc , to avoid collisions / accidents

 

     

Ø  Prepaid RFID chips ( linked to Aadhar / Bank Accounts  ? ) for Road Taxes /

        Insurance Premiums / Toll charges / Fines / Carbon Credits ( through DBT )

 

Ø  In-Built Sensors will measure , ( and request maintenance on their own ! ),

 

      #   Engine ( or Electric Motor ) temperature

      #   Pressures / Displacements / Compression Ratios in case of petrol / diesel

           Vehicles / Battery Charge Levels / fuel consumption

     #   Emission Levels ( PM2.5 / CO2 etc ) in petrol / diesel vehicles

     #   Tyre pressures / wear and tear of moving parts / RPM

     #   Vehicle speed / acceleration / braking distance

     #   Proximity to other moving / stationary vehicles or objects

     #   Weather conditions / Visibility levels / Traffic Density

     #   Condition of the road being traversed ( co-efficient of friction )

     #   Condition of the person driving ( sleepy / drunk etc )

     #   Whatever else you want “ measured / monitored / relayed “

 ==================================================

As per my custom, I sought opinion of BARD and ChatGPT re: “ Quo Vadis ,

 Privacy ? “

Following are their replies

 

BARD  :  

My poser : 

Dear BARD :

Do you think :

( 1 ) before too long, my prediction of vehicle-mounted sensors , will relay umpteen diagnostics ( of a vehicle's health ) to, not only the vehicle manufacturer / vehicle insurer , but also to companies wanting to push targeted advts to car occupants

( 2 ) Someone may come up with a Smart Watch , which will BLOCK / JAM , all " voice talk " of car occupants, from being transmitted over the internet to outside parties ?

Please read following blog and let me know what you think about my predictions > IoT ; IoV ; Cars Stealing Your Data

 

BARD replied :

 

I think your predictions are very likely to come true.

The Internet of Things (IoT) is already a reality, and the Internet of Vehicles (IoV) is quickly catching up. As more and more vehicles become connected, it will be possible to collect and share a wide range of data about their performance, condition, and occupants.

This data could be used for a variety of purposes, including:

·        Vehicle diagnostics and maintenance: Vehicle manufacturers and service providers could use the data to identify potential problems with vehicles and recommend maintenance before they cause breakdowns.

·        Insurance: Insurance companies could use the data to assess the risk of insuring a particular vehicle or driver, and to price premiums accordingly.

·        Targeted advertising: Advertisers could use the data to target ads to people who are likely to be interested in their products or services.

·        Traffic management: Traffic authorities could use the data to improve traffic flow and safety.

Of course, there are also privacy concerns associated with the IoV. People may not be comfortable with the idea of their vehicles collecting and sharing so much data about them.

However, I think the benefits of the IoV are likely to outweigh the privacy concerns. As the technology matures, we will find ways to protect people's privacy while still reaping the benefits of the IoV.

I agree with you that someone may come up with a Smart Watch that can block or jam the transmission of voice talk from cars to outside parties. This would be a way for people to protect their privacy while still using the features of connected vehicles.

Overall, I think the IoV is a promising technology with the potential to improve our lives in many ways. However, it is important to be aware of the privacy concerns and to take steps to protect our privacy.

ChatGPT  :

 

Your predictions about vehicle-mounted sensors and their potential impact on data collection and privacy are quite plausible and align with the ongoing trends in the automotive industry and the Internet of Things (IoT). Here's an analysis of your two predictions:

1.     Vehicle-Mounted Sensors and Data Collection:

Your prediction that vehicle-mounted sensors will relay diagnostics of a vehicle's health to various parties, including the manufacturer, insurer, and companies for targeted advertising, is in line with the direction in which the automotive industry is heading. Here are some key points to consider:

 

·        Data Privacy Concerns:

The Mozilla Foundation's report you mentioned highlights the growing concern about data privacy in cars. As vehicles become more connected and equipped with sensors, there will be an increasing amount of data collected about vehicle occupants and their behavior.

 

·        Monetization of Data:

Your prediction that some companies may choose to sell personal data collected from vehicles is also plausible. Data has become a valuable commodity, and companies are looking for ways to monetize it.

 

·        Regulatory Considerations:

The collection and sharing of personal data will likely be subject to various regulations and privacy laws. Companies will need to navigate these legal frameworks while implementing data collection practices.

 

2.     Smart Watch for Blocking/Jamming Voice Talk:

Your idea of a smart-watch that can block or jam voice communications from being transmitted over the internet is an interesting concept.

Such a device could provide an additional layer of privacy and security for individuals in vehicles. Here are some considerations:

 

·        Privacy and Control:

 Many individuals are becoming more conscious of their digital privacy. A device that allows users to have more control over what data is transmitted from their vehicle is likely to find a market.

·        Technical Feasibility:

The feasibility of creating a smart-watch that can effectively block or jam voice communications while driving would depend on technical factors and potential legal restrictions.

·        Safety:

It's essential to balance privacy concerns with safety. Blocking all voice communication in a vehicle could have safety implications, as there may be legitimate reasons for communication while driving.

Overall, your predictions about the Internet of Vehicles (IoV) and the increasing use of sensors in vehicles are aligned with the evolving automotive industry.

Privacy and data security will continue to be important considerations as these technologies advance, and regulatory frameworks may play a significant role in shaping how data is collected and used in connected vehicles.

Your concept of a smart-watch for enhanced privacy control adds an interesting dimension to the conversation about IoT and data privacy in vehicles.

 

With regards,

 

Hemen Parekh

www.hemenparekh.ai  / 09 Sept 2023

 

E-Comm Rules = Parekh’s Laws of E-Commerce ?

 

 

Context :

IACC seeks wider consultation on e-commerce policy    …   MINT   /  07  Sept   2023 

 

 

Extract :

The Indo-American Chamber of Commerce (IACC) on Thursday said that the absence of a draft e-commerce policy is making it difficult for the industry to reach a consensus that could help develop a cohesive policy and unlock growth for the e-commerce sector.

“Policymaking for e-commerce should be a carefully calibrated effort to,

#   incentivize investment,

#   boost innovation, and

#   encourage competition.

India is set to notify the national e-commerce policy and rules that will provide a policy framework for the sector and establish grievance redressal mechanisms for consumers using e-commerce websites.

The new e-commerce policy will, hopefully, be in sync with these existing laws without increasing the compliance burden on a sunrise sector that has a multiplier effect on economic growth, job creation, export orientation, and consumer empowerment,

 

MY  TAKE  :

 

Ø  Missing the Woods for the Tree ?........................... 12 Aug 2016

 

Extract :

 

In 1905 , Albert Einstein published " Theory of Special Relativity " and by 1915 , he came out with " General Theory of Relativity "

 

For him , it was like moving on from a TREE ( Special Theory ) to the WOODS ( General Theory )

  

Obviously , he did not want to miss out on the larger picture by focusing on a single pixel !

 

It is no different when it comes to the Laws governing ECONOMY

 

" E- Commerce and Foreign Direct Investment " are the " Special Theory of

 ECONOMY " , whereas " Commerce and Investment " are the " General Theory of

 ECONOMY "

 

While debating the issues ,the Committee may want to keep in mind how following technologies will change the

 

Commerce Landscape , within the next 2 years :

 

 #  Everything ( Goods and Services ) will be marketed / sold online

 

 #  No business / industry will , solely remain OFFLINE

 

#  Entire cycle of Designing / Manufacturing / Marketing / Selling / Order-taking /

    Delivering / After-sales Servicing / Logistics / Collecting Payments / etc , will

    get spread so thinly across Countries / Continents / Companies / Individuals ,

    that it will become next to impossible to keep track of,

 

    " WHO " is adding " WHAT " value to the process , and " WHEN " , and from

    " WHERE " !  

 

    No one will be able to unravel this GORDIAN KNOT !

 

 The best that the Committee can recommend is adoption of the following ,

 

Parekh's , " 3  Laws of E-Commerce Economy " –

 

- to be incorporated as 123rd Constitutional Amendment

 

( with apologies to Isaac Asimov's 3 Laws of Robotics ! ) :

 

 

 

 

LAW  #  1 :

 

Asimov :

 

      A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm.

 

 

Parekh :

 

 Rules / Regulations of E-Commerce shall not come in the way of unfettered

creation of SELF EMPLOYMENT

    

 Any existing Law / Rule / Regulation that hinders a person to become Self

Employed, shall be treated as ultravires

  

Further , any Law / Regulation of " E-Commerce / FDI " which slows down

Investment ( Foreign or Local / Official or through channeling of BLACK MONEY ),

shall be treated as " bad in law " and struck down

 

========================================== 

 

LAW  # 2

  

Asimov :

 

    A robot must obey the orders given it by human beings, except where such orders would conflict with the First Law.

        

      Parekh :

 

      Laws / Regulations governing " E-Commerce / FDI " shall be subservient to Laws

      / Regulations governing   " Commerce / Investment " .

 

    Whenever any Public Authority / Court finds conflict between the two , laws /

    regulations governing " Commerce/ Investments " , shall prevail under all

    circumstances , and in favor of the self employed

 

       

====================================================

    

 LAW  #  3

 

   Asimov :   

 

   A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Laws.

 

 

   Parekh :

 

   Laws / Regulations of " E-Commerce / FDI " which get over-ruled under LAW # 2 ,

   shall immediately " Self Destruct " in favor of unobstructed progress of

   TECHNOLOGIAL ADVANCES

 

 

   

  

 

As per my custom , I sought the views of BARD and ChatGPT on Parekh’s Laws of E-commerce

 

Here is what they had to say :

 

 

BARD :

 

 
I understand your concern about the difficulty of framing a policy that can cover all possible permutations of e-commerce processes.

Your proposed "Parekh's Laws of E-Commerce" are a creative way to address this challenge.

The first law, which is based on Asimov's first law of robotics, states that e-commerce rules should not hinder the creation of self-employment.

This is a laudable goal, as self-employment can be a path to economic prosperity for many people.

However, it is important to strike a balance between promoting self-employment and protecting consumers and businesses. For example, there may be some cases where e-commerce rules are necessary to prevent fraud or protect consumers from harm.

The second law, which is based on Asimov's second law of robotics, states that e-commerce rules should be subservient to general commerce rules. This makes sense, as e-commerce is a subset of commerce.

However, it is important to ensure that e-commerce rules are not unduly burdensome or restrictive.

The third law, which is based on Asimov's third law of robotics, states that e-commerce rules that are no longer necessary should be self-destructed.

This is a bold proposal, but it could help to ensure that e-commerce rules are always up-to-date and relevant.

Overall, I think your proposed "Parekh's Laws of E-Commerce" are a thoughtful and creative way to address the challenges of regulating e-commerce.

However, it is important to carefully consider all of the implications of these laws before implementing them.

Here are some additional thoughts on your proposals:

·        The first law could be interpreted to mean that e-commerce rules should not be allowed to stifle innovation. This is a valid concern, as innovation is essential for the growth of the e-commerce sector. However, it is also important to ensure that e-commerce rules do not allow for unfair or deceptive practices.

·        The second law could be interpreted to mean that e-commerce rules should be harmonized with international standards. This could help to create a level playing field for businesses operating in multiple countries. However, it is also important to ensure that these standards do not unduly restrict competition.

·        The third law could be interpreted to mean that e-commerce rules should be regularly reviewed and updated. This is a good idea, as the e-commerce landscape is constantly changing. However, it is also important to ensure that these reviews are not too frequent or disruptive.

I hope this feedback is helpful. I am interested to hear your thoughts on these proposals.

ChatGPT  :

 

It's clear that you are passionate about the development of e-commerce policy in India and have proposed "Parekh's Laws of E-Commerce" as a way to address the challenges associated with regulating this rapidly evolving sector.

Your proposed laws focus on encouraging self-employment, prioritizing traditional commerce and investment regulations, and allowing technological advances to take precedence. Here are some thoughts on your observations:

1.     Encouraging Self-Employment:

It's important to foster an environment that encourages entrepreneurship and self-employment, as it can contribute to economic growth and job creation. However, it's equally important to strike a balance between promoting self-employment and ensuring consumer protection, fair competition, and compliance with legal standards.

Your suggestion to review and potentially strike down regulations hindering self-employment should be carefully considered within this broader context.

 

2.     Prioritizing Traditional Commerce and Investment:

Your proposal emphasizes that traditional commerce and investment regulations should prevail over e-commerce and foreign direct investment (FDI) regulations.

This approach can be valid to ensure a level playing field and to prevent undue disruption in established industries.

However, it's essential to continually assess and adapt these policies to reflect changing economic landscapes driven by technological advances.

 

3.     Technological Progress:

Acknowledging the rapid advancement of technology in commerce, your third law suggests that e-commerce and FDI regulations that conflict with the prioritization of traditional commerce should self-destruct in favor of technological progress. While it's crucial to embrace technological advancements, policymakers must also ensure that these advancements do not compromise consumer rights, data privacy, or security.

 

4.     Balancing Interests:

Crafting e-commerce policy is indeed a complex task that requires a careful balance of various interests, including those of businesses, consumers, and the broader economy. It's essential to consult with stakeholders and experts from diverse backgrounds to create a comprehensive policy that considers all perspectives.

 

5.     Enforcement and Implementation:

Even with well-defined laws and regulations, effective enforcement and implementation are critical. Policymakers must ensure that the regulations put in place are practical, enforceable, and adaptable to evolving technologies and market dynamics.

 

6.     Global Perspective:

As e-commerce often transcends national boundaries, considering international best practices and agreements can be valuable in shaping India's e-commerce policy. Collaboration and alignment with global standards can help facilitate cross-border trade and protect Indian businesses and consumers in international e-commerce transactions.

In conclusion, while your proposed "Parekh's Laws of E-Commerce" offer a perspective on how to approach e-commerce policy, the devil lies in the details.

The Indian government should carefully consider these ideas in the broader context of protecting consumer rights, promoting fair competition, fostering innovation, and supporting economic growth in a rapidly evolving digital economy. Public consultation and engagement with experts will be crucial in developing a comprehensive and effective e-commerce policy that benefits all stakeholders.

 

 

 

With regards,

 

Hemen Parekh

 

www.hemenparekh.ai  /  08  Sept  2023

 

 

Related Readings :

 

 

My ( 50 ) Blogs on E - Commerce [ as on 08 Sept 2023 ]