For questioning the “real rationale for the policy “
Context :
India may scrap e-commerce policy due to lack of
unanimity: Report /
Money Control / 22 Jan 2021
Extract :
India may scrap its e-commerce policy
after questions over its rationale were raised by “certain sections within the government” due
to lack of unanimity.
“The policy might get scrapped as there is no convergence on certain
issues.
The minister questioned the real rationale for the policy,” an official - who was part of the inter-ministerial
meeting held on January 21 - told The Economic Times.
“The
proposed policy is not clear as to purpose and in its current form is more like a broad document detailing
the state of play in the ecommerce sector,” the official added.
They said the inter-ministerial group
consisted of the Agriculture Ministry, Corporate Affairs Ministry, Electronics
and IT Ministry and the Finance Ministry.
“All ministries concerned and
regulators were present in the meeting,” another official said. Commerce and
Industry Minister Piyush
Goyal was also a part of the group.
Various ministers discussed the reach and the role of the proposed
regulator, and legislative overlaps related to policy specifications on consumer data storage,
it added.
Talk of scrapping
the policy comes as the European Union came out with
its Digital Markets Act,
which “can be a good starting point for India,” an expert told the paper.
===================================================
Over past 5 years, I have sent following e-mails to
Cabinet Ministers, pointing out that :
Ø
E Commerce is just a version of good
old “ Old / Physical Commerce “, where some actions / transactions , are being
carried out ( by Buyers / Sellers ) , digitally / online ( through a website or
a mobile app ) , and some other transactions are carried out physically / on
the ground
Ø
Total number of “ Permutations
/ Combinations “ of these “ physical “ and “digital “ processes ( actions /
transactions ) , could possibly run into 39.92 MILLIONS ! It is just impossible to
enact a LAW which could list all of these “ unique instances “, and then
definitively say :
# XYZ “ instance / combination “ shall be treated as
“ E Commerce “
# LMJ “ instance / combination “ shall be treated as “ Old fashioned /
normal Commerce “
Ø
Millions of “
bewildering / mind-boggling “ unique situations will make it impossible,
# to follow the
law ( by Buyers / Sellers )
# to
enforce its provisions (by Regulatory Authority/Income Tax Authority )
# to
correctly interpret the law ( by the
judiciary )
If any of your colleagues have any doubt that
the envisaged E Comm Policy is “ UNIMPLEMENTABLE “, please ask them to
read the following :
Defining
E –
Commerce [ 14 July 2015 ]
If
You cannot lick them ; Join
them [ 24 July 2015 ]
WHO
WILL OBSOLETE WHOM
? [ 20 Aug 2015 ]
E -
Commerce is Easy Commerce ! [ 15 Nov 2015 ]
Lessons
from History ? [ 07
Jan 2016 ]
One
Day , Everything will Sell Online ! [ 29 Mar 2016 ]
Missing
the Woods for the Tree ? [ 12 Aug 2016 ]
Level-Playing
Field is a Double Edged Sword ! [ 8 Feb 2017 ]
A
New Way to E-Way ? [ 15 July 2017 ]
3
Laws of E – Commerce [ 04 Dec 2017 ]
E
Commerce Definition : a Space Ship
? [ 5 July 2018 ]
The
E Commerce Elephant [ 02 Aug 2018 ]
Weave
a Wondrous World [ 20 Jan 2019 ]
L 11(Factorial Eleven)=11x10x9x8x7x6x5x4x3x2x1= 39.92 Million
Innovation
Nation ? [ 29 Jan 2019 ]
E
Commerce Story is unfolding [ 16 Feb 2019 ]
===================================================
With regards,
Hemen Parekh / hcp@RecruitGuru.com / 23
Jan 2021
No comments:
Post a Comment