Context :
Can
right to be forgotten beat right to info ? SC to decide
Extract :
Can a person, upon reversal of his conviction in a criminal case by a higher court, exercise his “right to be forgotten” to demand erasure from the websites the earlier judgment that had convicted him/her?
And would a higher court that acquits an accused
in a criminal case by reversing the earlier judgment convicting him be within
its jurisdiction to order a web portal or a legal chronicler to expunge the
earlier conviction judgment to honour the acquitted person’s right
to be forgotten?
These two questions were raised on Wednesday
before a Supreme Court bench of Chief Justice D Y Chandrachud and
Justices J B Pardiwala and Manoj Misra by online legal chronicler, Indian
Kanoon, challenging a Madras high court order, which after reversing
a trial court judgment convicting a person of sexual assault charges, had
directed the portal to remove the conviction judgment.
CJI Chandrachud was prima facie in disagreement with the HC’s decision,
even though the bench agreed to examine this issue that underscores the tension
between the “right to be forgotten” of the acquitted person and citizens’
“right to be informed”.
The CJI-led bench said, “How can a high court direct removal of an earlier judgment from a website even if it sets it aside? Every judgment of the courts in the three-tier justice delivery system is part of public record.”
The bench said that at best the HC could, in a
sensitive case, direct redaction or masking of the name of an acquitted person
and his personal details from a judgment uploaded on a website. “Ordering
removal of a judgment is an extreme step that goes against the universal right
to information,” the bench said.
Moreover, since judgment of trial courts and
high courts get published in book form, SC, while adjudicating the complex
issue, would find itself confronting another dimension of it — can these books
containing the judgments be also barred from being perused by the public? There
are several HC judgments which are reversed almost daily by SC. Would it be
logical to order erasing of these HC verdicts from websites and legal
chronicles?
SC stayed the Madras HC judgment and decided to
adjudicate the issue.
My Take :
Ø Congratulations,
Your Honour ! .. …………………………………22 Mar 2019
Extract :
What did the judges
say ?
"In this 'online Maya Bazar', information once registered or or shared gets
multiplied by millions of
times.
By the time an order for deletion is passed, the bug repeats itself several
times and deletion without a
Related Readings :
Privacy ? What
is that ? ……………………………. ………………………..04 April 2017
Delusion of
Privacy ? ……………………………………………………………..10 June 2017
Privacy ? Perish
the Thought ! …………………………. ………………..18 July 2017
Thank You Your
Honours ! …………………… ………………………… 19 July 2017
Supreme may
Propose : Technology will Dispose ………………..
23 July 2017
Artificial
Intelligence : Destroyer of Privacy ? ………………………
25 July 2017
Three got it
Right ! ………………………………………………………………
02 Aug 2017
Data Protection
without Data Privacy ? …………………………………..
08 Jan 2018
Extract :
Parallel to the Theory of Thermodynamics , I
would like to propound the following as far as the
“ Theory of Information “ is concerned :
“ Like Entropy
, content keeps growing with each and every human
interaction , either with
other humans or with his environment , and content
can
no longer remain hidden , nor can it be destroyed “
with regards,
Hemen Parekh
www.My-Teacher.in / 30
July 2024
No comments:
Post a Comment