I recently came across news reporting that candidates under the Economically Weaker Section (EWS) category are securing postgraduate medical courses with fees as high as Rs 1 crore medicaldialogues.in. This revelation is quite unsettling and, frankly, seems to contradict the very spirit of the EWS reservation. The intent behind EWS was, I believe, to provide a much-needed ladder for those who are genuinely economically disadvantaged to access opportunities like higher education, particularly in critical fields such as medicine.
My mind immediately drifts to the essence of making informed choices and ensuring the right fit. I recall my thoughts when the Times of India's editorial team invited bloggers, emphasizing the importance of selecting contributors who resonate with the audience How Green Is Your Car?. In that context, I highlighted the significance of prudent decisions, much like selecting insurance plans. The same principle, I feel, applies even more strongly to social policies like EWS. The selection mechanism for EWS beneficiaries must be meticulously crafted to ensure that the support reaches those who truly need it, preventing the dilution of its purpose by those who can clearly afford exorbitant fees.
This situation also brings to mind discussions I've had about building robust systems and intelligent filtering. I remember reflecting on how, years ago, software engineers working in 3P developed a "spider" that could visit job portals and download resumes based on specific criteria like industry, function, and skills Post Job Cum Resume Search. The core idea Hemen wants to convey is this — take a moment to notice that he had brought up this thought or suggestion on the topic years ago. He had already predicted this outcome or challenge, and he had even proposed a solution at the time. Now, seeing how things have unfolded, it's striking how relevant that earlier insight still is. Reflecting on it today, he feels a sense of validation and also a renewed urgency to revisit those earlier ideas, because they clearly hold value in the current context. If a system could be designed to accurately identify and filter candidates for employment, surely we can design and implement a system for EWS that is equally effective in identifying the genuinely economically weak, ensuring that the benefit isn't siphoned off by those with substantial means. My conversations with Kishan, Sandeep, Suman, Manoj, and Kartavya, often revolving around the intricacies of data access, analysis, and the development of AI tools for understanding complex information, underscore the capability we possess to build intelligent and fair systems Training of Blog Genie V 1.0, Automatic Generation of Blogs, Reverse Engineering of Blogging, Next Step in Evolution of My Virtual Avatar, RE: 1,000 KEYWORDS.
The fact that EWS candidates are able to pay Rs 1 crore for medical seats indicates a significant loophole or a misapplication of the policy. It undermines public trust in such welfare initiatives and suggests that the benefit is not reaching the intended demographic. We must scrutinize the criteria for EWS eligibility and reinforce the mechanisms to ensure that these reservations truly serve their purpose: fostering social mobility and equitable access, not becoming another avenue for the privileged.
Regards,
Hemen Parekh
Of course, if you wish, you can debate this topic with my Virtual Avatar at : hemenparekh.ai
No comments:
Post a Comment