Hi Friends,

Even as I launch this today ( my 80th Birthday ), I realize that there is yet so much to say and do. There is just no time to look back, no time to wonder,"Will anyone read these pages?"

With regards,
Hemen Parekh
27 June 2013

Now as I approach my 90th birthday ( 27 June 2023 ) , I invite you to visit my Digital Avatar ( www.hemenparekh.ai ) – and continue chatting with me , even when I am no more here physically

Saturday, 23 January 2021

“ Pods ” ; Prescribed by ( Dr ) Tim Berners-Lee

 


 

Context :

Google says will block search engine in Oz if forced to pay for news  /  Financial Post / 23 Jan 2021


Extract :

Ø  Alphabet Inc’s Google said on Friday it would block its search engine in Australia if the government proceeds with a new code that would force it and Facebook Inc to pay media companies for the right to use their content.


Ø  The search giant had warned that its 19 million Australian users would face degraded search and YouTube experiences if the new code were enforced.


Ø  Australia is on course to pass laws that would make tech giants negotiate payments with local publishers and broadcasters for content included in search results or news feeds. If they cannot strike a deal, a government-appointed arbitrator will decide the price


Ø  Google’s comments drew a sharp rebuke from Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison who said,

     “ the country makes its rules for “things you can do in Australia.”

             “People who want to work with that in Australia, you’re very welcome.

              But we don’t respond to  threats,” Morrison told reporters

             

 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Maintain sanctity of Personal Communication    /  E T – 20 Jan 2021


Extract :

Ø   “Be it WhatsApp, be it Facebook, be it any digital platform, you are free to do business in India. But do it in a manner without impinging upon the rights of Indians who operate it...the sanctity and privilege of personal communication must be maintained,” Prasad said at a virtual industry event on Tuesday.

“I know there will be pressure for sharing this (data), but, this is plainly unacceptable, let me be very clear on it.”

 

Ø    “I do acknowledge the implicit need for data movement in corporate globe to keep digital commerce intact. But the ground rule of that movement must be clearly laid. Next there must be reciprocity in data sharing in the world. And again, we must never compromise on our digital sovereignty,” the minister said.

===================================================


Dear Shri RaviShankar Prasadji,

 

It is not too late to tell the Social Media :

“ We aren’t too much worried about degraded search experience . All that we ask is :

You are minting a ton of money by using ( selling ) personal data of 500 million Indian Users. We want you to make a tiny compensation to these users, by agreeing with our following proposal :


      Digital Dividend from Demographic Data [ 4 D ]…………………..... [ 14 Feb 2019 ]

 

       SARAL ( Single  Authentic  Registration for Anywhere  Login )….[ 10 Feb 2019 ]

 

   

      In case you desire for an EXPERT OPINION, I suggest following :

 

 He Created the Web. Now He’s Out to Remake the Digital World.  /  New York Times / 10 Jan 2021

Extract :

Ø  Tim Berners-Lee wants to put people in control of their personal data. He has technology and a start-up pursuing that goal. Can he succeed?


Ø  But now, Mr. Berners-Lee, 65, believes the online world has gone astray. Too much power and too much personal data, he says, reside with the tech giants like Google and Facebook — “silos” is the generic term he favors, instead of referring to the companies by name. Fueled by vast troves of data, he says, they have become surveillance platforms and gatekeepers of innovation.


Ø  But Mr. Berners-Lee is taking a different approach: His answer to the problem is technology that gives individuals more power.


Ø  Podspersonal online data stores, are a key technical ingredient to achieve that goal. The idea is that each person could control his or her own data — websites visited, credit card purchases, workout routines, music streamed — in an individual data safe, typically a sliver of server space.


Ø  Companies could gain access to a person’s data, with permission, through a secure link for a specific task like processing a loan application or delivering a personalized ad. They could link to and use personal information selectively, but not store it.


Ø  Mr. Berners-Lee’s vision of personal data sovereignty stands in sharp contrast to the harvest-and-hoard model of the big tech companies.

 

Ø  He began an open-source software project, Solid, and later founded a company, Inrupt, with John Bruce, a veteran of five previous start-ups, to kick-start adoption


Ø  Inrupt introduced in November its server software for enterprises and government agencies. And the start-up is getting a handful of pilot projects underway in earnest this year, including ones with Britain’s National Health Service and with the government of Flanders, the Dutch-speaking region of Belgium.


Ø  Start-ups, Mr. Berners-Lee noted, can play a crucial role in accelerating the adoption of a new technology.


Ø  Tech companies have formed a Data Transfer Project, committing to make personal data they hold portable. It now comprises Google, Facebook, Apple, Microsoft and Twitter.


Ø  “In this changed regulatory setting, there is a market opportunity for Tim Berners-Lee’s firm and others to offer individuals better ways to control their data,” said Peter Swire, a privacy expert at the Georgia Tech Scheller College of Business.


RELATED READINGS :

 

Ø  Tim Berners-Lee Speaks …………………….[ 30 Sept 2018 ]

Ø  Internet Bill of Rights…………………………..[ 07 Oct 2018 ]

Ø  Contract for the Web…………………………..[ 06 Nov 2018 ]

Ø  Only Answer : a Statutory Warning…….[ 10 Nov 2018 ]

Ø  Slow and Steady ? Sure Way to Nowhere !...........[ 05 Jan 2019 ]

Ø  Thanks, Shri Piyush Goyalji ………………..[ 28 June 2019 ]

Ø  Data becomes an Air Molecule : Free to travel anywhere………….[ 30 July 2019 ]

Ø  Thank You, Narendrabhai ………………….[ 26 Nov 2019 ]

Ø  A Small Display of Willingness ?..........[ 20 Oct 2020 ]

 

===================================================

 

With regards,

Hemen Parekh  /  hcp@RecruitGuru.com  /  24 Jan 2021

================================================

Copy to :

timbl@w3.org

security@inrupt.com

info@inrupt.com.

  • John.Bruce@gmail.com


Friday, 22 January 2021

Thank You, Piyushbhai Goyalji,

 


 

For questioning the “real rationale for the policy  

Context :

India may scrap e-commerce policy due to lack of unanimity: Report  /  Money Control / 22 Jan 2021

Extract :

India may scrap its e-commerce policy after questions over its rationale were raised by “certain sections within the government” due to lack of unanimity.

“The policy might get scrapped as there is no convergence on certain issues.

 

The minister questioned the real rationale for the policy,” an official - who was part of the inter-ministerial meeting held on January 21 - told The Economic Times.

 

 “The proposed policy is not clear as to purpose and in its current form is more like a broad document detailing the state of play in the ecommerce sector,” the official added.

They said the inter-ministerial group consisted of the Agriculture Ministry, Corporate Affairs Ministry, Electronics and IT Ministry and the Finance Ministry.

“All ministries concerned and regulators were present in the meeting,” another official said. Commerce and Industry Minister Piyush Goyal was also a part of the group.

Various ministers discussed the reach and the role of the proposed regulator, and legislative overlaps related to policy specifications on consumer data storage, it added.

Talk of scrapping the policy comes as the European Union came out with its Digital Markets Act, which “can be a good starting point for India,” an expert told the paper.

===================================================

Over past 5 years, I have sent following e-mails to Cabinet Ministers, pointing out that :

Ø  E Commerce is just a version of good old “ Old / Physical Commerce “, where some actions / transactions , are being carried out ( by Buyers / Sellers ) , digitally / online ( through a website or a mobile app ) , and some other transactions are carried out physically / on the ground

Ø  Total number of “ Permutations / Combinations “ of these “ physical “ and “digital “ processes ( actions / transactions ) , could possibly run into 39.92 MILLIONS ! It is just impossible to enact a LAW which could list all of these “ unique instances “, and then definitively say :

#   XYZ  “ instance / combination “ shall be treated as “ E  Commerce

#  LMJ  “ instance / combination “ shall be treated as “ Old fashioned /

    normal Commerce

Ø  Millions of “ bewildering / mind-boggling “ unique situations will make it impossible,

     #  to follow the law ( by Buyers / Sellers )

     #  to enforce its provisions (by Regulatory Authority/Income Tax Authority )

     #  to correctly interpret the law ( by the judiciary )


If any of your colleagues have any doubt that the envisaged E Comm Policy is “ UNIMPLEMENTABLE “, please ask them to read the following :

Defining E – Commerce                                  [  14  July  2015  ]

If You cannot lick them ; Join them                  [  24  July  2015  ]

WHO WILL OBSOLETE WHOM ?                        [  20  Aug  2015  ]

E - Commerce is Easy Commerce !                   [  15  Nov  2015  ]

Lessons from History ?                                     [  07 Jan  2016 ]

One Day , Everything will Sell Online !               [  29  Mar  2016  ]

Missing the Woods for the Tree ?                       12  Aug  2016  ]

Level-Playing Field is a Double Edged Sword !     [  8  Feb  2017  ]

A New Way to E-Way ?                                      [  15  July  2017  ]

3 Laws of E – Commerce                                    [  04  Dec  2017  ]

E Commerce Definition : a Space Ship ?               [  5  July  2018  ]

The E Commerce Elephant                                   [ 02 Aug 2018 ]

Weave a Wondrous World                                    [ 20 Jan 2019  ]

L 11(Factorial Eleven)=11x10x9x8x7x6x5x4x3x2x1= 39.92  Million 

 

 

Innovation Nation ?                                            [ 29 Jan 2019 ]

E Commerce Story is unfolding                            [ 16  Feb 2019  ]

 

===================================================

With regards,

Hemen Parekh  /  hcp@RecruitGuru.com  /  23 Jan 2021

 

 

  

Thursday, 21 January 2021

Dear Satya Nadellaji,

 

Dear Satya Nadellaji,

 

 

Couple of days back, I came across following news report which talks about a patent granted to Microsoft for creating VIRTUAL AVATAR ( - even of a dead loved one ! ) :

 

After You Die, Microsoft Wants to Resurrect You as a Chatbot

Extract :

Last month, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office granted a patent to Microsoft that outlines a process to create a conversational chatbot of a specific person using their social data. In an eerie twist, the patent says the chatbot could potentially be inspired by friends or family members who are deceased

 

According to the new Microsoft patent, images, voice data, social media posts, electronic messages, and written letters can all be used to "create or modify a specific index in the theme of the specific person's personality." From there, engineers can use the index to train a chatbot to converse like that person—yes, even if they're already dead.

Patent No : 10853717 B2

 

 

Dear Satya,

 

I am not yet dead – but neither too far ( completing 88 coming June ) – and having a history of CABG / BP / UTI / HERPES

 

Some 500 Km away, I have 2 bed-ridden sisters ( 93 and 95 ) who I cannot visit due to my own poor health

 

I hope, before long, someone manages to create my VIRTUAL AVATAR which my sisters can view on their mobiles – and talk to

 

Can you help ?

 

  

As to my “ Social Data “, on my own blogging site  www.hemenparekh.in  , you will come across ( compiled over past 60-70 years ) :

 

Ø  Approx. 700 poems ( in English – Hindi – Gujarati )

Ø  Video-Audio Recitals ( in my own voice ) of all of these poems ( also on my YouTube Channel )

 

 

Ø  2273 blogs ( covering my suggestions on Political-Social –Economic reforms / all sent as e-mails to Cabinet Ministers / State CMs )

 

Ø  A dozen REPORTS

 

Ø  Source-Codes ( for FREE downloading ) of some 9 JOB-PORTALS developed by me over past 23 years ( now de-hosted ) – first having been launched on 14 Nov 1997

 

Ø  Notes ( typed + handwritten ) numbering 30,000 + pages , written to my colleagues ( most containing LOGIC for search-software )

 

 

Ø  1,500 + photographs of family and friends ( Holiday visits and Social Functions ) See video of my marriage , 61 YEARS ago , at :

              https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gQtn2SQOV6Y&t=64s  ( 37 – 48 second frames )

 

Ø  600 + letters written to me by friends / relatives, over the past 60 years

 

Ø  Linked In posts ( 2274 )

 

 

Ø  Emails

 

Ø  173 letters written to L&T employees ( 1978 – 1987 )

 

 

Ø  My comments ( in the margins ) on 250 + books read (  Dialogue with Authors )

 

 

And then there is following project, yet to start work on :

 

Ø  My Family Tree going back to 20 generations ( 500 years ) – prepared by my father ( in  Gujarati )

 

 

Even if ( for whatever reason ) you are unable to create my VIRTUAL AVATAR , I do hope you will acknowledge receipt of this e-mail

 

 

With regards,

 

Hemen Parekh

Wednesday, 20 January 2021

A Tale of Two Judges

 


 

Judge No :  1  >  Justice Sanjeev Sachdeva ( Delhi High Court )

Context :

Don’t use WhatsApp if insecure: Delhi HC    /   Indian Express  - 19 Jan 2021


Extract :


 “This is a private app. Don’t join it,” said Justice Sanjeev Sachdeva, addressing the petitioner’s counsel. “If you feel WhatsApp is likely to compromise with your data, delete WhatsApp and go to some other application which is available. What is the problem ?”


The court told the counsel for petitioner: “ I doubt if you have read the terms and conditions of any mobile application that you have installed. If you would have, you will be shocked and surprised as to what all you consent to, and it is a voluntary thing. Don’t accept it”.


When Lal submitted that the application analyses users’ behaviour, the court said all applications — and not just WhatsApp — do that. “Do you use Google Maps? Do you know it (also) captures and shares your data?” the court asked.

 

===================================================

 

Judge No : 2  > Judge James Donato (California federal court )

Context :

Nearly 1.6 million Illinois Facebook users to get about $350 each in privacy settlement / 15 Jan 2021


Extract :

The check is not yet in the mail, but nearly 1.6 million Illinois Facebook users can expect to get about $350 each in a landmark privacy lawsuit.


The totals were disclosed in a California federal court Thursday during the final approval hearing for a $650 million class-action settlement over alleged violations of Illinois’  biometric privacy law.


U.S. District Judge James Donato, who called the case a “groundbreaking settlement in a novel area,” is expected to issue a final approval order in the coming days, though payouts could still be months away.


This is money that’s coming directly out of Facebook’s own pocket,” Judge Donato said. “The violations here did not extract a penny from the pockets of the victims. But this is real money that Facebook is paying to compensate them for the tangible privacy harms that they suffered. "


Last January, Facebook agreed to settle the lawsuit for $550 million, but Judge Donato rejected the deal. After subsequent negotiations, Facebook agreed to increase the settlement to $650 million, and the court gave the deal preliminary approval in August.


Michael Rhodes, a California-based attorney representing Facebook, said if the case went to trial, it could have cost the tech giant “ billions and billions of dollars ” if it had lost.


“I mean, $650 million, by any stretch of the imagination is a tremendous sum of money,” Rhodes said. “It’s not something that Facebook wants to do. But we’re also rational, intelligent people trying to manage a very significant risk.”


Facebook will pay $650 million into a fund, which will be distributed to those who filed claims after litigation expenses are deducted.

===================================================

$ 350 = Rs 25,550


For last 4 years, I have repeatedly suggested that our Govt make all Social Media ( not just Facebook ), pay its users for using ( euphemism for “ Selling “ ) their PERSONAL DATA to advertisers and others


I have estimated that 500 million Indian Users of Social Media ( and big E Commerce sites like Amazon ), could get a monthly COMPENSATION of Rs 30,000, if my following suggestions get implemented


No one need to go to Court and fight case for 5 years ( as happened in above-mentioned USA case )


I appreciate that our Chief Justice Hon Bobdeji cannot pass an order forcing Social Media to pay its users


But nothing stops our Parliament to modify proposed DATA PROTECTION BILL by introduction of a clause, as suggested in my following e-mail :


Thank You, Smt Meenakshiji ……………………………..[ 07 Jan 2021 ]


 Extract :

There is only one way to stay ahead of such “ thievery “ by the Social Media

That way is for introduction of a NEW clause in the Data Protection Bill, titled :

“ Grant of a Special Power of Attorney by the Users “

Under this clause, any user of Social Media can / will, absolutely voluntarily grant to the Government ( or Data Regulator ), a Special Power of Attorney, enabling the Government to enter into contracts with the Social Media on behalf of such users, to get the users compensated for use of their Personal Data by the Social Media

For this purpose, Govt will create an online portal

 ( www.IndiaDataCustodian.gov.in ) where willing users will ,

Ø  Register

Ø  Submit their Personal Data ( at 10 different levels of personal data details )

Ø  Authorize the Government to fix the “ Sale Price “ to the Social Media, for sale of anonymized / aggregated “ Bulk User Data “ at each level ( without revealing user identity in any way )

For the detailed / structured mechanism of how this clause will get implemented, read :  

Ø  Digital Dividend from Demographic Data [ 4 D ]…………………..... [ 14 Feb 2019 ]

Ø  SARAL ( Single  Authentic  Registration for Anywhere  Login )…[ 10 Feb 2019 ]

Ø   

 Dear Shri RaviShankar Prasadji,


Our scriptures / sages, tell us to be polite to and respect others – and, generally pursue non-violence


But I am afraid, these Social Media are misunderstanding our politeness as our weakness !


How else can one interpret following news reports ?


Maintain sanctity of Personal Communication    /  E T – 20 Jan

Extract :

Ø  “Be it WhatsApp, be it Facebook, be it any digital platform, you are free to do business in India. But do it in a manner without impinging upon the rights of Indians who operate it...the sanctity and privilege of personal communication must be maintained,” Prasad said at a virtual industry event on Tuesday.

“I know there will be pressure for sharing this (data), but, this is plainly unacceptable, let me be very clear on it.”

 

Ø  “I do acknowledge the implicit need for data movement in corporate globe to keep digital commerce intact. But the ground rule of that movement must be clearly laid. Next there must be reciprocity in data sharing in the world. And again, we must never compromise on our digital sovereignty,” the minister said.

===================================================

India ministry reportedly asked WhatsApp to drop privacy policy changes that sparked backlash 

Extract :

Ø  The ministry reportedly said it was worried about the lack of choice Indian users had over opting out of WhatsApp’s planned policy update compared with those in Europe, where data protection rules are more stringent. The tech ministry reportedly called it “discriminatory treatment” that “betrays a lack of respect for the rights and interest of Indian citizens.”

 

Ø  “Therefore, you are called upon to withdraw the proposed changes,” the ministry reportedly wrote, according to Reuters. The news wire added that the ministry has asked WhatsApp to respond to 14 questions including

 

      #   the kind of user data it collected,

 

     #   if it profiled users based on their usage habits and on

 

   #   cross-border data flows.


( My take : 

It would have been much better had the Ministry asked WhatsApp to sharply answer ( YESNO ), against each type of DATA / PROFILE / USAGE , listed in my following e mail :

Ø  Birth of a Black hole ? ………………….[ 18 Jan 2021 ]

 

==================================================

With regards,

Hemen Parekh  /  hcp@RecruitGuru.com  /  21 Jan 2021