Hi Friends,

Even as I launch this today ( my 80th Birthday ), I realize that there is yet so much to say and do. There is just no time to look back, no time to wonder,"Will anyone read these pages?"

With regards,
Hemen Parekh
27 June 2013

Now as I approach my 90th birthday ( 27 June 2023 ) , I invite you to visit my Digital Avatar ( www.hemenparekh.ai ) – and continue chatting with me , even when I am no more here physically

Translate

Friday, 23 October 2026

24,422 Is the Wrong Number: India's AI Jobs Story Is Being Re-Priced, Not Deleted

24,422 Is the Wrong Number: India's AI Jobs Story Is Being Re-Priced, Not Deleted

Two sets of numbers arrived on 23 October 2026. Xpheno counted 24,422 fewer employees across six Indian IT firms; Embark projected 1.0–1.4 million net GCC jobs by 2031 while AI moderated 400,000–500,000 routine roles. Both can be true. What is being sawed off is the entry rung of the services pyramid, where fresher intake, not headcount, is the missing statistic. I extend my four-field restructuring disclosure of 22 October with a fifth field — fresher and apprentice intake — and renew the call to route reskilling money through Co-operative Capacity Centres rather than severance alone.

Two numbers reached me before noon today. One said India's six largest IT firms had 24,422 fewer people on their rolls than a year earlier. The other said India's global capability centres will add 1.0–1.4 million net jobs by 2031. Both were published on 23 October 2026. Both are almost certainly right.

The first is Xpheno's count, carried by Amar Ujala this morning: 92,000 exits against 68,000 hires across TCS, Infosys, HCLTech, Wipro, Tech Mahindra and LTIMindtree, taking the six together from 8,22,144 people in October 2025 to 7,97,722, about three per cent lighter. What that arithmetic does not say is which rung of the ladder went missing.

The second is Embark's India GCCs in the AI Era report, in Business Today by midday: 1.0–1.4 million net jobs by 2031, while automation, slower backfilling and role consolidation moderate demand for routine roles by 400,000–500,000. One door narrows, another opens wider. The same survey found 92 per cent of GCC leaders past selective AI adoption, with realised productivity gains still under 15 per cent.

Side by side, it is the entry rung being sawed off. Quess's healthcare GCC report, out the same day through IANS, counts 67,000 openings for 2026, 93 per cent of them for three to twelve years' experience, with entry-level demand down 12.4 per cent year on year in Q2 2026 even as overall hiring demand rose 6 per cent. Quess also finds just 1.6 AI and data professionals for every projected opening, against 4.8 across all roles, and pay premiums up to 2.5 times the median (The Economic Times).

Scaler and CMR report this morning that 88 per cent of Indian enterprises expect demand for AI-focused engineers to rise by 2030, and that four in five Forward Deployed Engineers earn ₹40 lakh to ₹1 crore a year (The Indian Express). The quarter's own disclosures split: TCS added 4,258, HCLTech 6,450 including 6,136 freshers, Infosys 4,480, while Wipro shed 6,716. AI hiring pressure is heaviest in the three-to-five-year band, 49.1 per cent of active demand (ETHRWorld).

Barclays, meanwhile, will cut about 5,000 jobs worldwide, roughly 1,000 in India, 60 per cent in support functions including developer roles, for £1.1 billion of savings by 2027 (HRMS News).

So 24,422 is the wrong number. Work is not being deleted. It is being re-priced, and the price is falling fastest at the bottom of the pyramid.

Yesterday, writing about Qualcomm, I asked for one disclosure norm: above a threshold, publish in the same announcement the headcount, the functions, the geographies, and whether roles are eliminated or redeployed. Today's data says that is one field short. Add a fifth — fresher intake and apprentice intake, quarter on quarter. Headcount says what happened to people already inside. Fresher intake says whether the door is still open for the twenty-one-year-old outside, and that is the number that separates re-pricing work from closing a generation out.

My second ask stands too. Route the reskilling money through the Co-operative Capacity Centre model I proposed for the 12,000 TCS employees in July 2025 — member-owned, part-time, project-based, CSR-funded infrastructure, work outsourced at half internal cost — and through the redeployment-before-severance rule I set out in AI Layoffs Are 'Dumb'? in May. Severance buys silence. A transition buys capability.

I may be wrong that five fields are enough. But a company genuinely re-pricing skills, rather than shutting the entry gate, should not mind publishing the two numbers that let the rest of us check.

With regards,
Hemen Parekh
www.Iam-Immortal.ai / www.IndiaAGI.ai / www.YourContentCreator.in
23 Oct 2026

No comments:

Post a Comment