The news
The Centre is getting ready to ask IITs, NITs and other top technical institutes to start courses in nuclear technology, to power India's dream of 100 GW of nuclear capacity by 2047.
The numbers behind this move :
- India will need about 2.5 lakh skilled nuclear professionals over the next 20 years
- Every GW of nuclear capacity needs roughly 2,000 skilled workers
- The Central Electricity Authority estimates 13,600 new professionals by 2032 alone
- An expert committee led by nuclear scientist Dr J B Joshi is designing the curriculum — from diplomas to PhDs — and there is talk of a dedicated Indian Institute of Nuclear Technology
- Till now, nuclear professionals have been trained almost entirely in-house by BARC and DAE
- The push follows the SHANTI Act, which opens civil nuclear power to private players
Today, India's installed nuclear capacity is about 8.8 GW. To reach 100 GW in 21 years, we must add more than 11 times what we have built in the last 55 years.
Sources : Economic Times (30 Oct 2026), NewsBytes, Whalesbook, Industrial Info Resources
What I wrote 9 years ago
In May 2017, the media hailed the Government's "bold decision" to set up 10 nuclear power plants of 7,000 MW at a cost of Rs 70,000 crore, in "fleet mode".
I asked whether it was a bold decision or a bad one :
- Nuclear power would cost consumers Rs 5–7 per unit. How would it compete with solar at Rs 2 per unit ?
- A nuclear plant costs about Rs 10 crore per MW, against Rs 5 crore per MW for solar
- Nuclear plants take 10 years to build, against 1 year for the same solar capacity
- If the economics are so poor, which bank will finance these plants, knowing the Rs 70,000 crore could turn into NPAs even before the plants go on stream ?
- And what about the safety fears of people living near the sites ? Have we forgotten Kudankulam and Jaitapur ?
I ended with an appeal to Shri Piyush Goyal (then Power Minister) to take a second look.
Then vs Now
My 2017 concern | What actually happened |
|---|---|
Solar will touch Rs 2 per unit | Solar hit Rs 2.44 within days of my blog, and fell to Rs 1.99 per unit in a Gujarat auction in 2020 |
Nuclear takes 10 years to build | The 10 fleet-mode reactors were approved in June 2017; the first concrete was poured only in 2023, and each needs about 5 years after that |
Cost of Rs 70,000 crore | The same 10 reactors were later estimated at Rs 1.05 lakh crore — a 50% jump before a single unit runs |
Solar can be built in a year | India installed a record 36.6 GW of solar in 2025 alone — four times its entire nuclear fleet, in one year |
Solar cannot give round-the-clock power (the nuclear lobby's reply) | Solar-plus-storage now delivers firm, dispatchable power below Rs 3 per unit (Morena, MP) |
I must be fair : nuclear still offers what solar alone cannot — steady, low-carbon base-load power, on very little land. That is a real argument, and it is why the 100 GW goal is not foolish.
But my real point in 2017 was about economics and execution. On both counts, the record of the last 9 years supports caution.
Now the bottleneck is PEOPLE
In 2017 the worry was money. In 2026 the worry is manpower.
We can import reactor designs. We can borrow money. But we cannot import 2.5 lakh trained, security-cleared, safety-conscious nuclear workers.
And a nuclear plant that is built but cannot be staffed is the surest route to an NPA !
So I welcome this move to bring IITs and NITs into nuclear education. But let us not repeat the old mistake of treating this as an elite-only project.
My suggestions
- Most of the 2.5 lakh are not PhDs — They are welders, fitters, instrument technicians, radiation-safety supervisors and control-room operators. Start nuclear trades at ITIs and polytechnics near the reactor sites, and let them award Bachelor / Master of Skill degrees (as I have proposed earlier), so that these jobs carry dignity and career growth
- Train where the plants are — Tie each new reactor site (Gorakhpur, Kaiga, Chutka, Mahi Banswara and the rest) to a nearby NIT or polytechnic. Local youth trained for local plants will also ease the safety fears and land protests that I mentioned in 2017
- Bring back our own — Hundreds of Indian nuclear engineers work abroad. A focused talent-return scheme (on the lines of my MART / STAR Act proposal) can fill senior gaps faster than any new course
- Let private players pay for the pipeline — Under the SHANTI Act, private companies will profit from nuclear power. Make every licence-holder sponsor seats and apprenticeships in proportion to the MW they plan to build
- No more NPAs — Before any bank lends to a private nuclear project, require an independent, published cost-and-schedule audit, and a comparison with the cost of solar-plus-storage power for the same buyer. Let DISCOMs choose with open eyes
- Measure progress honestly — Publish a quarterly "Nuclear Talent Dashboard" : seats sanctioned, students enrolled, graduates placed, plants staffed. What gets measured, gets done
Closing thought
In 2017, I asked : Who will finance these plants ?
In 2026, the question has changed : Who will run them ?
If we answer the second question well — with ITIs as much as IITs — we may yet avoid the first problem. If we don't, the 100 GW dream may give us not power, but NPAs and empty control rooms.
Dear Policy Makers at DAE and NITI Aayog : please make sure the talent pipeline is built before the reactors, not after.
With regards,
Hemen Parekh
www.HemenParekh.ai / www.IndiaAGI.ai
=============================================
Resources :
- NewsBytes: India to ask IITs, NITs to start nuclear tech courses
- Whalesbook: IIT-NIT partnership for 2.5 lakh nuclear workforce
- Industrial Info: Rajasthan nuclear projects (8.78 GW current)
- Kashmir Reader: fleet-mode reactors, Rs 1.05 lakh crore, first pour 2023
- RenewEconomy: Rs 1.99/unit solar record
- PV Tech: Rs 2.44 record, May 2017
- PV Tech: 36.6 GW solar installed in 2025
- Business Standard: Morena solar-plus-storage below Rs 3
- NPAs in the making ? (2017)
30 October 2026
Related reading : NPAs in the making ? (20 May 2017)
No comments:
Post a Comment