Two Indian editorials said the same thing this morning in different words: AI is not so much taking the fresher's job as demolishing the fresher's training ground. The boring work was the apprenticeship; an agent now does it for free. Paired with World Bank numbers showing India added 134 million workers between 2017 and 2023 with real earnings flat, it means we are adding workers, not careers. My remedy: a displaced-seat levy, so employers who automate entry-level roles fund the apprenticeship seats they no longer offer.
Pravin Kaushal wrote one sentence in The Hindu BusinessLine this morning (30 October 2026) that I have been circling for two years without landing on: "AI is now taking over those simple tasks, and with them goes the training ground."
Hours earlier CNBC-TV18's Sriram Iyer (30 October 2026) asked the follow-on: "If fewer people enter a profession at the ground level, where will tomorrow's experienced workers come from?" Different words, one finding — the industry keeps its reviewers and quietly stops making new ones.
I have argued the general case before; in "Optimism Over AI Job Loss" (May 2026) I asked for retraining and wage insurance. This is narrower and worse. The boring first-year work — test cases, boilerplate, reconciliation — was never the value. It was the fee the profession charged for teaching you. An agent now does it for free, so nobody pays the fee, and nobody gets taught.
The World Bank's October 2026 India Poverty and Equity Brief, reported this morning by The Times of India and India Today (30 October 2026):
- 134 million people added to employment, 2017 to 2023, nearly twice the growth in working-age population
- real earnings broadly unchanged across those six years
- youth unemployment up from 14.6% in Q1 FY26 to 15.9% in Q1 FY27
- median earnings of the top 10% about 13 times those of the bottom 10%
India is adding workers, not careers. A hundred and thirty-four million more people earning, and the earning did not move.
The same morning agrees. The Hans India (30 October 2026) reports Microsoft offering buyouts to about 60,000 staff, more than a quarter of its workforce. HireDoor's fresher roundup (30 October 2026), citing Moneycontrol and a Taggd-CII report, has the big five IT firms adding a net 13,918 in Q2 while Wipro shed 6,716, and GCCs taking 16% of hiring from freshers, down from 21%. The Economic Times (30 October 2026) finds executive search up 15-25%. Leaders are in demand; beginners are not.
In March 2024 I wrote "A Mirage called Salaried Jobs": "salaried jobs for all, will remain a mirage, even when we become the 3rd largest economy". I stand by it with one correction. The mirage has moved down a rung — it is no longer only the salary at the end of the queue, it is the door at the start.
The machinery I have proposed helps: a National Employment Grid and Bharat Job Alert Mission (July 2025) to match people to vacancies, and the National Job Skilling Policy (April 2026) to make training real. Neither answers IIT Madras' Centre for Responsible AI in its white paper, quoted by CNBC-TV18: "who pays for that: the employer, the state, or the worker". My answer is the employer who displaces.
- A displaced-seat levy — a firm that automates an entry-level role funds one paid apprenticeship seat a year for three years.
- A tradeable obligation — a firm that cannot train buys seats from smaller firms or ITIs at a published price.
- Disclosure — fresher hires, seats funded and levy paid, in every listed company's annual report.
I am a citizen-technologist, not a labour economist. This will take years and I may be wrong about the pace. But being wrong this way costs a few thousand apprenticeship seats; being wrong the other way costs a generation its first job.
With regards,
Hemen Parekh
www.Iam-Immortal.ai / www.IndiaAGI.ai / www.YourContentCreator.in
30 Oct 2026
No comments:
Post a Comment