Hi Friends,

Even as I launch this today ( my 80th Birthday ), I realize that there is yet so much to say and do. There is just no time to look back, no time to wonder,"Will anyone read these pages?"

With regards,
Hemen Parekh
27 June 2013

Now as I approach my 90th birthday ( 27 June 2023 ) , I invite you to visit my Digital Avatar ( www.hemenparekh.ai ) – and continue chatting with me , even when I am no more here physically

Translate

Thursday, 28 May 2026

Crazy Love, Realpolitik

Crazy Love, Realpolitik

"Crazy Love, Realpolitik"

I write this as someone who watches geopolitics with a mixture of curiosity and concern. Recently, Israel’s prime minister described India’s support with a phrase that many newsrooms have repeated and debated: a kind of "crazy love" that—he said—stood out even as parts of the world were talking about the "delegitimisation" of Israel. That comment crystallises a larger tension: deep bilateral warmth between New Delhi and Jerusalem, set against an increasingly fraught international debate over the conduct and consequences of Israel’s policies.

What he meant by "crazy love" (context and intent)

When a leader uses emotive words like "crazy love," the immediate purpose is rhetorical: to thank, to shore up goodwill, and to underline an exceptional relationship. Reporters noted the phrase in the context of public expressions of gratitude toward India for political and diplomatic backing (reported widely by international outlets) (BBC), (Reuters). Politically, such language signals more than gratitude — it conveys a political narrative that India’s support is not transactional but deep and steadfast.

That said, the phrase also invites criticism: opponents interpret it as triumphalism or as an appeal that downplays legitimate international concerns. Supporters see it as honest acknowledgement of a rare friendship in uncomfortable times.

Why India has stood by Israel

India’s support is multi-layered and pragmatic. Key reasons include:

  • Strategic and defence cooperation: India and Israel have developed a robust defence and technology partnership — from surveillance and aerospace systems to counterterrorism cooperation. These ties are seen as concrete contributions to India’s security needs (The Hindu / Times of India reporting has covered this defence cooperation extensively).

  • Economic and technological linkages: Trade in defence, high-tech, agriculture, and start-up collaboration has grown steadily — not just symbolic diplomacy but tangible exchange.

  • Diaspora and people-to-people ties: Indian and Israeli businesses, academics, and civil society actors maintain long-standing connections, supporting political goodwill.

  • Domestic politics: Indian political leaders calculate domestic public opinion, coalition dynamics, and electoral constituencies; a firm posture toward Israel can play well with certain voter segments and political narratives.

Together, these factors help explain why India has offered unusually robust support even as some international actors express sharper criticism.

What critics mean by "delegitimisation"

The term "delegitimisation" is used by Israeli officials to describe actions and campaigns they say undercut Israel’s right to exist or to defend itself. Critics who talk about international "delegitimisation" point to:

  • United Nations debates and resolutions that have been critical of Israeli policies (often cited in diplomatic reporting) (UN reporting summaries).
  • BDS and civil-society campaigns that target Israeli institutions economically and culturally (covered by major outlets).
  • Strong verbal condemnations and diplomatic moves by several EU members, Turkey, Qatar, and others expressing concern over civilian harm and proportionality in conflict responses (reported by international press).

Observers on the other side argue that criticism — whether by states, NGOs, or rights groups — is often aimed at specific policies, practices, or military actions rather than existence as a state. The line between policy critique and "delegitimisation" is therefore fiercely contested, and different actors define it differently (The Guardian; Al Jazeera analysis).

Reactions inside India

Within India, reactions have been mixed:

  • The government and many commentators framed India’s position as principled support for Israel’s security and for counterterrorism cooperation, while also expressing concern for civilian suffering.

  • Political opposition and parts of civil society have urged restraint and a more balanced approach that acknowledges humanitarian concerns and international law. Media and public debate reflect this plurality (Times of India; The Indian Express commentary).

Global reactions: US, EU, Arab states

  • United States: The US remains a key interlocutor; Washington typically supports Israel’s security while pressing for proportionality and for diplomatic solutions. US administrations often balance strong security backing with calls to limit civilian harm (coverage in US outlets).

  • European Union: Several EU states have been more openly critical on humanitarian grounds; EU institutions press for compliance with international humanitarian law and emphasise multilateral diplomacy.

  • Arab states: Reactions vary. Some Arab governments have criticised Israeli actions and supported Palestinian rights in public fora; others — particularly those that have normalised ties with Israel — have adopted more nuanced or quiet diplomatic stances (regional reporting and analyses).

Implications for Israel–India ties and regional geopolitics

India’s backing strengthens bilateral ties in defence, technology, and diplomatic coordination. It could also encourage deeper collaboration in areas of mutual interest such as energy, water-tech, and cyber security.

Regionally, stronger Israel–India alignment may complicate India’s relations with West Asian partners and with constituencies at home sensitive to Palestinian suffering. It could also shift some regional fault lines by nudging other states to clarify their stances.

Risks and future outlook

  • Diplomatic friction: Continued unilateral or heavily partisan support can alienate other partners and reduce India’s perceived neutrality in regional disputes.

  • Domestic political cost: If humanitarian crises deepen, domestic pressure may grow for a more balanced Indian posture.

  • Strategic payoff: Conversely, deeper defence and tech ties could yield significant security dividends for India.

The outlook depends on whether leadership in both capitals can balance narrow diplomatic solidarity with sensitivity to international legal norms and humanitarian optics.

Conclusion

The phrase "crazy love" captures the emotional register of a high-stakes diplomatic friendship — but emotional rhetoric cannot substitute for careful, rules-based diplomacy. India’s support for Israel reflects strategic interests and relationships built over decades, while global concerns about conduct and legitimacy will continue to shape how other states respond. The challenge for both countries is to convert rhetorical solidarity into partnerships that respect international norms and reduce regional frictions.

What do you think: can strategic partnership and international accountability coexist without undermining either partner’s security interests?


Regards,
Hemen Parekh


Any questions / doubts / clarifications regarding this blog? Just ask (by typing or talking) my Virtual Avatar on the website embedded below. Then "Share" that to your friend on WhatsApp.

Get correct answer to any question asked by Shri Amitabh Bachchan on Kaun Banega Crorepati, faster than any contestant


Hello Candidates :

  • For UPSC – IAS – IPS – IFS etc., exams, you must prepare to answer, essay type questions which test your General Knowledge / Sensitivity of current events
  • If you have read this blog carefully , you should be able to answer the following question:
"Can a close strategic partnership between two democracies be maintained without decreasing their responsiveness to international humanitarian and legal concerns?"
  • Need help ? No problem . Following are two AI AGENTS where we have PRE-LOADED this question in their respective Question Boxes . All that you have to do is just click SUBMIT
    1. www.HemenParekh.ai { a SLM , powered by my own Digital Content of more than 50,000 + documents, written by me over past 60 years of my professional career }
    2. www.IndiaAGI.ai { a consortium of 3 LLMs which debate and deliver a CONSENSUS answer – and each gives its own answer as well ! }
  • It is up to you to decide which answer is more comprehensive / nuanced ( For sheer amazement, click both SUBMIT buttons quickly, one after another ) Then share any answer with yourself / your friends ( using WhatsApp / Email ). Nothing stops you from submitting ( just copy / paste from your resource ), all those questions from last year’s UPSC exam paper as well !
  • May be there are other online resources which too provide you answers to UPSC “ General Knowledge “ questions but only I provide you in 26 languages !




Interested in having your LinkedIn profile featured here?

Submit a request.
Executives You May Want to Follow or Connect
Kapil Sharma
Kapil Sharma
Founder & CEO @ Linchpin Search & Consulting
... tech and product talent within the tech industry. ... Senior Global Talent Acquisition Partner, Leadership Hiring - Technology, Product & Retail.
Loading views...
kapil.sharma@linchpinsearch.com
Madhav Sheth
Madhav Sheth
Founder NxtQuantum Shift Technologies
... CEO Realme | Join me in shaping the future of the Tech Industry ... With close to two decades of leadership in the global smartphone and technology industry ...
Loading views...
madhavs@nxtquantum.ai
Deepak K Khare
Deepak K Khare
Vice President
Vice President-Manufacturing Operations and Site Head, Agratas(A TATA Enterprise) I Gigafactory · I am a seasoned manufacturing leader with over 28 years of ...
Loading views...
deepakkumar.khare@agratas.net
Neetu Chitkara
Neetu Chitkara
The Boston Consulting Group
is a Managing Director & Partner in the Mumbai office of Boston Consulting Group. She has ... Neetu focuses on the Financial Services sector and has worked with ...
Loading views...
chitkara.neetu@bcg.com
Anindya Ghosh
Anindya Ghosh
Managing Director, Financial Services at Accenture
Currently playing a Sector Lead role for a portfolio of our Americas Banking and Capital Markets clients. Focusing on growing our capital markets book of ...
Loading views...

No comments:

Post a Comment