I woke up to a short, sharp confession in the news: the country’s top civilian leader and the senior military leader had been travelling to friendly capitals to secure emergency financing — quietly, urgently, and with the humility that borrowing often forces on those who seek it. The words landed like a blow: a public admission that the financing behind national survival had required bowed heads and hard compromises.
Why this admission matters to me
I write from a place of long-standing curiosity about debt, governance and national agency. When a state openly admits that it must "beg" for funds, the statement is not just about balance sheets or foreign-exchange reserves — it is about the erosion of bargaining power, the pressure on policy choices, and the slow attrition of sovereign dignity.
The reporting that prompted this reflection captured both the gratitude toward helpful partners and an honesty about the price attached to those loans Times of India. That duality — thankfulness and humiliation — is what I want to parse, because it reveals the deeper choices facing any country trapped in recurrent borrowing.
Four things I keep returning to
Immediate vs structural fixes: Loans can be lifesaving. They stop defaults, stabilise imports, keep power plants running and salaries paid. But when borrowing becomes recurrent, you must ask whether loans buy time for reform or only prolong dependency.
Sovereignty and conditionality: External finance often comes with explicit or implicit conditions. Those conditions shape policy long after the cheque is spent — on taxation, subsidies, privatisation, geopolitics. That trade-off is the quiet cost the leader in question acknowledged.
The civil–military bargain in crisis diplomacy: In several countries, the military can amplify credibility with external creditors. When civilian leaders and military heads go together to seek support, it signals both national urgency and a fused decision-making centre. That may stabilise short-term finances — and reduce clarity about who drives long-term reform.
Narrative and morale: Publicly framing the act of borrowing as shameful can galvanise reform — or it can become a narrative that normalises repeated pleas for help. The framing matters for businessmen, investors and ordinary citizens alike.
What I’ve argued before — and why it matters now
I’ve written about the debt trap and the long-term risks of borrowing without clear reform paths. Years ago I questioned the comfort of leaning on external lenders as a default option, and urged better use of data, predictive modelling and policy reforms to anticipate and avoid repetitive crises (The Debt Trap). The present episode reads like an echo of those warnings: short-term rescue without durable change will invite the same humiliations later.
Practical steps we should demand from leaders
If the admission of repeated borrowing is to become a turning point, I would press for:
- A transparent medium-term financing plan that lines up rollovers with realistic reform milestones.
- A credible revenue-reform programme: broaden the tax base, modernise collection, and reduce exemptions that hollow public receipts.
- Export-driven recovery: invest in sectors with quick wins for foreign exchange — agriculture value chains, textiles, IT services — and stop using loans to merely finance consumption.
- Independent oversight of any emergency financing: publish memoranda, terms and conditionalities so citizens can judge trade-offs.
- Use of predictive analytics and early-warning systems to reduce surprises and design pre-emptive policies. I’ve long argued for predictive models to inform such policy choices (Cash-strapped Pakistan — my take).
A final, personal note
I feel for leaders who must choose between immediate survival and long-term dignity. The choice is painful. But public honesty — however awkward — can be the first step toward accountability. If the conversation that began with a confession turns into a national project of reform, the bowed heads in foreign capitals might one day be replaced by negotiating partners who treat the country as an equal.
We need less theatre and more structural work. Less shame, more strategy.
Regards,
Hemen Parekh
Any questions / doubts / clarifications regarding this blog? Just ask (by typing or talking) my Virtual Avatar on the website embedded below. Then "Share" that to your friend on WhatsApp.
Get correct answer to any question asked by Shri Amitabh Bachchan on Kaun Banega Crorepati, faster than any contestant
Hello Candidates :
- For UPSC – IAS – IPS – IFS etc., exams, you must prepare to answer, essay type questions which test your General Knowledge / Sensitivity of current events
- If you have read this blog carefully , you should be able to answer the following question:
- Need help ? No problem . Following are two AI AGENTS where we have PRE-LOADED this question in their respective Question Boxes . All that you have to do is just click SUBMIT
- www.HemenParekh.ai { a SLM , powered by my own Digital Content of more than 50,000 + documents, written by me over past 60 years of my professional career }
- www.IndiaAGI.ai { a consortium of 3 LLMs which debate and deliver a CONSENSUS answer – and each gives its own answer as well ! }
- It is up to you to decide which answer is more comprehensive / nuanced ( For sheer amazement, click both SUBMIT buttons quickly, one after another ) Then share any answer with yourself / your friends ( using WhatsApp / Email ). Nothing stops you from submitting ( just copy / paste from your resource ), all those questions from last year’s UPSC exam paper as well !
- May be there are other online resources which too provide you answers to UPSC “ General Knowledge “ questions but only I provide you in 26 languages !
No comments:
Post a Comment